Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Should you Max Out and Frontload 401K early? >

Should you Max Out and Frontload 401K early?

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Should you Max Out and Frontload 401K early?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2021, 10:27 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,103
Default

Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr View Post
My personal approach to this is to maximize money in tax advantaged accounts that will minimize my taxes in retirement on the assumption I will be in a high tax bracket in that phase of life.

In retirement I will have A plan and military pension benefits totaling roughly $140k/yr, B plan benefits that will have mandatory disbursement amounts, and maybe Social Security that’s been maxed out. In other words, my taxable income is likely to be above $200k/yr in retirement. In addition, I max out my Roth 401k, my wife and my Roth IRAs (back door), and our HSA. Our tax advantaged annual savings are approximately $75k between the Roth 401k, Roth IRA, HSA, and B plan. The advantage to the Roth accounts and the HSA is that tapping them will not add to my taxable income. The disadvantages have been discussed above. The exception being the HSA which is tax free going in and out, if used for qualified expenses.
solid plan. Rmd gets a little tricky as it uses life expectancy tables but your using those tables and dividing the total tradition Ira amount. Knowing that and if that’s still the case in 20 years my plan will be use cash the first few years of retirement and pull from the tradition and load up roths while in a low tax bracket. Lowering the rmd at 72. My mom just hit 73 and had to pull 4% as a gauge.
fcoolaiddrinker is online now  
Old 02-03-2021, 12:16 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2020
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr View Post
My personal approach to this is to maximize money in tax advantaged accounts that will minimize my taxes in retirement on the assumption I will be in a high tax bracket in that phase of life.

In retirement I will have A plan and military pension benefits totaling roughly $140k/yr, B plan benefits that will have mandatory disbursement amounts, and maybe Social Security that’s been maxed out. In other words, my taxable income is likely to be above $200k/yr in retirement. In addition, I max out my Roth 401k, my wife and my Roth IRAs (back door), and our HSA. Our tax advantaged annual savings are approximately $75k between the Roth 401k, Roth IRA, HSA, and B plan. The advantage to the Roth accounts and the HSA is that tapping them will not add to my taxable income. The disadvantages have been discussed above. The exception being the HSA which is tax free going in and out, if used for qualified expenses.
Contrary to the Fidelity commercial, I won’t be in the “retire and start a vineyard” category. I’ll likely be the geezer sitting there at McDonalds drinking coffee. It is what it is.
Forgotmywallet is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 12:38 PM
  #43  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 76
Default

Originally Posted by Aviator4life View Post
I'll be the elephant in the room and say front loading this year with Biden in charge probably won't pay off.
https://www.newsweek.com/us-jobs-inc...alysis-1566313

I’ll save you a click...you’re VERY wrong.
ScrappyCocoa is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 12:44 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 218
Default

Originally Posted by ScrappyCocoa View Post
https://www.newsweek.com/us-jobs-inc...alysis-1566313

I’ll save you a click...you’re VERY wrong.
Actually he's correct so far. S&P while doing well is lower than it was on Jan 20. Remains to be seen how it will react to new policies & capital gains+cooperation tax changes.
ELAC321 is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 01:11 PM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 76
Default

Originally Posted by ELAC321 View Post
Actually he's correct so far. S&P while doing well is lower than it was on Jan 20. Remains to be seen how it will react to new policies & capital gains+cooperation tax changes.
We both know he wasn’t referring to Biden’s first two weeks.
ScrappyCocoa is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 06:59 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 751
Default

Originally Posted by ScrappyCocoa View Post
We both know he wasn’t referring to Biden’s first two weeks.
I think we also know that in order for Biden to outpace Trump’s economic performance, he has his work cut out for him. Of course, I’d love for him to do this. Of course! Who doesn’t want the country to be financially killing it? The economy will always be a top three priority for me. But to do so:Do I think that Biden is the man for the job? Well, according to the past two weeks where we just snuff out $1.6B (XL Pipeline) from local economies for a symbolic gesture, I think it’s safe to say we’re not on the right track.
NotMrNiceGuy is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 07:39 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,103
Default

Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy View Post
I think we also know that in order for Biden to outpace Trump’s economic performance, he has his work cut out for him. Of course, I’d love for him to do this. Of course! Who doesn’t want the country to be financially killing it? The economy will always be a top three priority for me. But to do so:Do I think that Biden is the man for the job? Well, according to the past two weeks where we just snuff out $1.6B (XL Pipeline) from local economies for a symbolic gesture, I think it’s safe to say we’re not on the right track.
A 33% increase in the DJIA puts us around 40000. I’ll take that bet all day long. Anywhere between 3.5-5.5% unemployment is good. Below 3% is negative due to labor shortages stunting growth. 2.5%, that’s barely above inflation but nice to see. Pipeline is a whole different conversion. The lost economic value of that could be offset with private electric infrastructure. In short I would be surprised if the economy was worse in 4 years than it was Jan 20. We’ll see.
fcoolaiddrinker is online now  
Old 02-03-2021, 08:16 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 751
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker View Post
A 33% increase in the DJIA puts us around 40000. I’ll take that bet all day long. Anywhere between 3.5-5.5% unemployment is good. Below 3% is negative due to labor shortages stunting growth. 2.5%, that’s barely above inflation but nice to see. Pipeline is a whole different conversion. The lost economic value of that could be offset with private electric infrastructure. In short I would be surprised if the economy was worse in 4 years than it was Jan 20. We’ll see.
The DJIA on 11/7/2016 was 18,900. He left office on 1/20/2021 at 31,100. That’s up 64% cumulative. Not sure where you came up with 33%? Even if you took the market from Trump’s Inauguration Day at 20,100, it’s still a 54% increase. Either way, Biden needs to get to 47,750 by either metric to match Trump’s performance. Still want that bet?

As far as the rise in wages, that number may seem small, but was never reached from 2010-2017. The entire Obama economy. It was over 3% in 2018 and 2019.

The pipeline was not mentioned for the $1.6B loss for the economy. That’s peanuts overall. It’s the tone. The pipeline lowered emissions and provided jobs. So why cut it? Symbolism. In politics world, a pipeline means oil, which means dirty pollution. So the symbolic meaning is putting climate change over the economy. This is what will happen going forward and it will be to the detriment of the economy.
NotMrNiceGuy is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 08:45 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,103
Default

Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy View Post
The DJIA on 11/7/2016 was 18,900. He left office on 1/20/2021 at 31,100. That’s up 64% cumulative. Not sure where you came up with 33%? Even if you took the market from Trump’s Inauguration Day at 20,100, it’s still a 54% increase. Either way, Biden needs to get to 47,750 by either metric to match Trump’s performance. Still want that bet?

As far as the rise in wages, that number may seem small, but was never reached from 2010-2017. The entire Obama economy. It was over 3% in 2018 and 2019.

The pipeline was not mentioned for the $1.6B loss for the economy. That’s peanuts overall. It’s the tone. The pipeline lowered emissions and provided jobs. So why cut it? Symbolism. In politics world, a pipeline means oil, which means dirty pollution. So the symbolic meaning is putting climate change over the economy. This is what will happen going forward and it will be to the detriment of the economy.
Use nov 3-nov to nov 3 or Jan 20 to Jan 20. Most economists use Jan 20. The official number on Jan 20 2017 was 19,759.06. Was going with 20k and 30k but you got me. It’s nowhere near your 64%. 2.5% is small. Not exactly insurmountable. By the way what was unemployment on Jan 20? I’ll bet thats beat easily. Not really looking to get into another political discussion. Hoping we get out of this mess like everyone else. I’m not super thrilled with either side and hoping for middle ground ASAP.

Last edited by fcoolaiddrinker; 02-03-2021 at 08:59 PM.
fcoolaiddrinker is online now  
Old 02-04-2021, 05:37 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,395
Default

The ol' which president is better for the stock market game, huh?

Unfortunately, it's a nearly pointless game to play as there are too many variables outside of the Presidents control.

The good news is, the stock market gains on average every year regardless of who the president is. Just keep saving for retirement guys.

https://www.investors.com/etfs-and-funds/sectors/sp500-which-u-s-president-was-best-for-stocks-wasnt-trump/

Too long, didn't read: the stock market just keeps going up. Went up under Trump, Obama, and Clinton. Stop worrying, keep saving.

Last edited by Aero1900; 02-04-2021 at 05:52 AM.
Aero1900 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
labbats
Allegiant
243
06-25-2014 05:50 PM
shoelu
Major
24
12-21-2011 12:20 PM
tcaphou
Fractional
8
02-25-2008 11:38 AM
cloudkicker1981
Hiring News
27
10-22-2006 12:35 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-09-2005 09:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices