Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Fat pax want bigger seat and unlimited snacks >

Fat pax want bigger seat and unlimited snacks


Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Fat pax want bigger seat and unlimited snacks

Old 04-17-2023 | 04:22 AM
  #41  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 473
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
Four pages of posts based on a Fox News article about someone with a 5000 signature petition 🙄🙄🙄

Maybe we can do a few pages on stinky or ugly people next?
That’s the point I was trying to make earlier. All these smart airline pilots don’t realize they’re all of a sudden outraged and typing long diatribes on APC about a petition that doesn’t matter and isn’t news. They just take the rage/fear bait hook line and sinker. They’re addicted to it.
Reply
Old 04-17-2023 | 05:21 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,682
Likes: 167
Default

Originally Posted by Ice Bear
Just had to say, +1 for somebody finally acknowledging SEAT WIDTH OVER SEAT PITCH. 3x3 on a 737 or A320 is rough for an average-sized male, and it's not the legroom. Also, one armrest for two people is dastardly and unethical. Even with two Midwesterners both refusing it out of politeness, everybody loses. Ditch the pitch and make it 5-abreast.
The problem with reducing the seating capacity to accommodate bigger seats is that people would revolt over the necessary increase in ticket prices to maintain revenue. That $500 ticket now cost $600. The solution is much more affordable. People who pay for one seat should expect use of the entire space, those who take up more room should pay for it.
Reply
Old 04-17-2023 | 09:46 AM
  #43  
Line Holder
15 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 673
Likes: 12
From: B767 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by hindsight2020
Bit of a sidebar but, for context, in 1985 none of the main 4 offered seating narrower than 19 inches, and we were a heck of a lot thinner as a society back then. So the causation is not on fat people entitlement being the genesis of this.
I was a kid in 1985, not flying a lot then but I’d have sworn 727s and 737s at United had 6-across seating when I was a kid. So were the aisles a lot narrower, or am I remembering incorrectly, or is the article wrong? I don’t see any other possibilities here.
Reply
Old 04-17-2023 | 12:17 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Default

Oh surprise, another "news" article to stir up discord. From the original fear and hate, fake news channel nonetheless. But it sells because people buy it. And so much more entertaining and simple then reporting on Economic Policy.

This crap reporting would not have seen the light of day 30 years ago.
Reply
Old 04-17-2023 | 01:15 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,682
Likes: 167
Default

Originally Posted by FliesInSoup
Oh surprise, another "news" article to stir up discord. From the original fear and hate, fake news channel nonetheless. But it sells because people buy it. And so much more entertaining and simple then reporting on Economic Policy.

This crap reporting would not have seen the light of day 30 years ago.
Is MSNBC any different? Cable news networks are all biased and pander to their target audiences using the same playbook.
Reply
Old 04-17-2023 | 01:58 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
Is MSNBC any different? Cable news networks are all biased and pander to their target audiences using the same playbook.
I'm not defending any network, but there's only one that's going to trial for $1.6 billion for lying to their viewers. I'd call that an objective difference.
Reply
Old 04-17-2023 | 03:18 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 2,261
Likes: 423
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
Is MSNBC any different? Cable news networks are all biased and pander to their target audiences using the same playbook.
He didn’t say it was. So to whom are you addressing this issue? Are you stuck in the “they do it too” phase? It’s pretty obvious that all the major news organizations peddle fear for money……….unless you are stuck in the matrix.

Now specifically, it’s hilarious that one in particular is struggling with a 1.6 billion lawsuit that they knowingly lied to keep people watching, and yet here we are, links still going out like they have any validity…that’s very telling no?
It absolutely shrieks propaganda slave.


. Take the blue or red, and see how far down the hole you go, but for the love of god keep your extremism to yourself on the flightdeck……please
Reply
Old 04-17-2023 | 03:44 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,682
Likes: 167
Default

Originally Posted by Hubcapped
He didn’t say it was. So to whom are you addressing this issue? Are you stuck in the “they do it too” phase? It’s pretty obvious that all the major news organizations peddle fear for money……….unless you are stuck in the matrix.

Now specifically, it’s hilarious that one in particular is struggling with a 1.6 billion lawsuit that they knowingly lied to keep people watching, and yet here we are, links still going out like they have any validity…that’s very telling no?
It absolutely shrieks propaganda slave.


. Take the blue or red, and see how far down the hole you go, but for the love of god keep your extremism to yourself on the flightdeck……please
Who’s being extreme? All I said was that both sides are biased and play the same games. I actually find watching the news more amusing than anything. The same story gets completely different spins based what channel you’ve tuned in. Especially regarding politics, it’s kind of fun to watch a story on Fox News, MSNBC, and CNN to see how far they spin it.
Reply
Old 04-17-2023 | 03:51 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 2,261
Likes: 423
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
Who’s being extreme? All I said was that both sides are biased and play the same games. I actually find watching the news more amusing than anything. The same story gets completely different spins based what channel you’ve tuned in. Especially regarding politics, it’s kind of fun to watch a story on Fox News, MSNBC, and CNN to see how far they spin it.
My apologies, the extremism is attached to the OP. Anyone that posts either fox or cnn and believes it’s real/productive/genuine…….is an extremism imho. They’ve departed the middle ground
Reply
Old 04-17-2023 | 06:00 PM
  #50  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 192
Default

Originally Posted by Red Forman
Take your diatribe elsewhere.
Personally I think Burke brings a varied background, and though often lengthy, some knowledgeable posts.

For those posts that irritate me, from whomever, I sometimes respond....usually not, but accept their right to be (in my view) anywhere from a complete idiot to just ignorant.

many decades ago my wife provided me with a bit of insight that helped her, and I have adopted it with some occasional success.

She arrived in this country as a stateless refugee. In my parents time the term would have been DP.
She came from a country where you could be imprisoned for reading Orwell, or Solzhenitsyn, or Michnik etc. Imprisoned for even having such works in your possession, etc.

It drove her nuts, for some time, that in a country where you could read anything from Lenin to Hitler to Marx to Dostoevsky to Miłosz, people read Daniel Steele. Aargh!
She finally made peace of it with this:
"Being free means you are free to be as ignorant as you wish".

So, if we are free, then people are free to be as ignorant, as annoying, and as wrong as can be.
So...to both yourself and JBurke...carry on.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-02-2012 07:28 AM
APC225
United
14
05-29-2012 10:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices