We need to amend the RLA
#41
delta tried to get this in our last contract. What I was told was the company balked and the mediator took the company’s side since that really isn’t a thing in other private sector industries. I’m not aware of any other non government employee who get a benefit like this.
#42
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
#43
https://www.laborandcollectivebargai...%20mid%2D1950s.
Yeah, and they cover 6% of the workers... Guess I should have said "not for the VAAAAAAST majority" instead of "not".
#44
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
https://www.laborandcollectivebargai...%20mid%2D1950s.
Yeah, and they cover 6% of the workers... Guess I should have said "not for the VAAAAAAST majority" instead of "not".
Yeah, and they cover 6% of the workers... Guess I should have said "not for the VAAAAAAST majority" instead of "not".
#45
#46
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
#48
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,618
Likes: 558
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Even the traditionally "pro labor" politicians don't want catastrophic economic disruption and public (voter) inconvenience, since they would be left holding the bag. Don't believe me? Google (Biden+railroad). Also you have to consider the "Railway" part of the RLA... changes could (would) have even more serious economic and supply chain consequences than just airlines. Assuming the changes end up pro labor to begin with, which is not assured.
I would suggest that anyone proposing RLA amendment needs to specify:
1) What changes they seek, and
2) How they propose to sell (or extort) politicians to get it done, and
3) How they will synchronize it all with the railroad people.
Railroad unions will be very leery, because not only do they need *their* interests accounted for, they don't want a bunch of pilots opening a big can of worms with a lot of possible but not very predictable outcomes... they'll need to feel comfortable that any such attempt would not fall on the wrong side of the fence. As should we.
#49
I asked this question and was told by a national ALPA guy (who I met at random) many years ago that neither the airlines nor our unions want to open up the RLA because it's a can of worms and nobody can predict how it might go down. A push to change it would cross multiple elections and likely a couple WH administrations... the tide could turn at the worst possible moment. His explanation has held up over time.
Even the traditionally "pro labor" politicians don't want catastrophic economic disruption and public (voter) inconvenience, since they would be left holding the bag. Don't believe me? Google (Biden+railroad). Also you have to consider the "Railway" part of the RLA... changes could (would) have even more serious economic and supply chain consequences than just airlines. Assuming the changes end up pro labor to begin with, which is not assured.
I would suggest that anyone proposing RLA amendment needs to specify:
1) What changes they seek, and
2) How they propose to sell (or extort) politicians to get it done, and
3) How they will synchronize it all with the railroad people.
Railroad unions will be very leery, because not only do they need *their* interests accounted for, they don't want a bunch of pilots opening a big can of worms with a lot of possible but not very predictable outcomes... they'll need to feel comfortable that any such attempt would not fall on the wrong side of the fence. As should we.
Even the traditionally "pro labor" politicians don't want catastrophic economic disruption and public (voter) inconvenience, since they would be left holding the bag. Don't believe me? Google (Biden+railroad). Also you have to consider the "Railway" part of the RLA... changes could (would) have even more serious economic and supply chain consequences than just airlines. Assuming the changes end up pro labor to begin with, which is not assured.
I would suggest that anyone proposing RLA amendment needs to specify:
1) What changes they seek, and
2) How they propose to sell (or extort) politicians to get it done, and
3) How they will synchronize it all with the railroad people.
Railroad unions will be very leery, because not only do they need *their* interests accounted for, they don't want a bunch of pilots opening a big can of worms with a lot of possible but not very predictable outcomes... they'll need to feel comfortable that any such attempt would not fall on the wrong side of the fence. As should we.
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: B737 FO
I would suggest that anyone proposing RLA amendment needs to specify:
3) How they will synchronize it all with the railroad people.
Railroad unions will be very leery, because not only do they need *their* interests accounted for, they don't want a bunch of pilots opening a big can of worms with a lot of possible but not very predictable outcomes... they'll need to feel comfortable that any such attempt would not fall on the wrong side of the fence. As should we.
(Yes, I should read some history on the RLA to understand better how/why the aviation industry was rolled into the RLA together with the railroads....)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



