Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
We need to amend the RLA >

We need to amend the RLA

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

We need to amend the RLA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2023 | 12:43 PM
  #41  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,160
Likes: 219
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
delta tried to get this in our last contract. What I was told was the company balked and the mediator took the company’s side since that really isn’t a thing in other private sector industries. I’m not aware of any other non government employee who get a benefit like this.
A CBA is not a thing in other private industries..... What I don't get is that ALPA, SWAPA & APA don't collectively make this a hard issue. It would definitely speed up negotiations.
Reply
Old 06-09-2023 | 01:48 PM
  #42  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
A CBA is not a thing in other private industries..... What I don't get is that ALPA, SWAPA & APA don't collectively make this a hard issue. It would definitely speed up negotiations.
there are a lot of CBAs in other industries.
Reply
Old 06-09-2023 | 02:03 PM
  #43  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,160
Likes: 219
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
there are a lot of CBAs in other industries.

https://www.laborandcollectivebargai...%20mid%2D1950s.

Yeah, and they cover 6% of the workers... Guess I should have said "not for the VAAAAAAST majority" instead of "not".
Reply
Old 06-09-2023 | 02:40 PM
  #44  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
https://www.laborandcollectivebargai...%20mid%2D1950s.

Yeah, and they cover 6% of the workers... Guess I should have said "not for the VAAAAAAST majority" instead of "not".
true, but of those that exist, none have infinite COL adjustment clauses.
Reply
Old 06-09-2023 | 05:38 PM
  #45  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,160
Likes: 219
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
true, but of those that exist, none have infinite COL adjustment clauses.
And I don't have a clue, but how normal is it for private sector CBAs to be amendable for 3+ years, because those workers can walk?
Reply
Old 06-10-2023 | 05:59 AM
  #46  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
And I don't have a clue, but how normal is it for private sector CBAs to be amendable for 3+ years, because those workers can walk?
probably not very common unless they’re fellow RLA workers.
Reply
Old 06-10-2023 | 07:57 AM
  #47  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,160
Likes: 219
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
probably not very common unless they’re fellow RLA workers.
Exactly filler
Reply
Old 06-10-2023 | 10:37 AM
  #48  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,618
Likes: 558
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
A CBA is not a thing in other private industries..... What I don't get is that ALPA, SWAPA & APA don't collectively make this a hard issue. It would definitely speed up negotiations.
I asked this question and was told by a national ALPA guy (who I met at random) many years ago that neither the airlines nor our unions want to open up the RLA because it's a can of worms and nobody can predict how it might go down. A push to change it would cross multiple elections and likely a couple WH administrations... the tide could turn at the worst possible moment. His explanation has held up over time.

Even the traditionally "pro labor" politicians don't want catastrophic economic disruption and public (voter) inconvenience, since they would be left holding the bag. Don't believe me? Google (Biden+railroad). Also you have to consider the "Railway" part of the RLA... changes could (would) have even more serious economic and supply chain consequences than just airlines. Assuming the changes end up pro labor to begin with, which is not assured.

I would suggest that anyone proposing RLA amendment needs to specify:

1) What changes they seek, and
2) How they propose to sell (or extort) politicians to get it done, and
3) How they will synchronize it all with the railroad people.

Railroad unions will be very leery, because not only do they need *their* interests accounted for, they don't want a bunch of pilots opening a big can of worms with a lot of possible but not very predictable outcomes... they'll need to feel comfortable that any such attempt would not fall on the wrong side of the fence. As should we.
Reply
Old 06-10-2023 | 11:53 AM
  #49  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,160
Likes: 219
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I asked this question and was told by a national ALPA guy (who I met at random) many years ago that neither the airlines nor our unions want to open up the RLA because it's a can of worms and nobody can predict how it might go down. A push to change it would cross multiple elections and likely a couple WH administrations... the tide could turn at the worst possible moment. His explanation has held up over time.

Even the traditionally "pro labor" politicians don't want catastrophic economic disruption and public (voter) inconvenience, since they would be left holding the bag. Don't believe me? Google (Biden+railroad). Also you have to consider the "Railway" part of the RLA... changes could (would) have even more serious economic and supply chain consequences than just airlines. Assuming the changes end up pro labor to begin with, which is not assured.

I would suggest that anyone proposing RLA amendment needs to specify:

1) What changes they seek, and
2) How they propose to sell (or extort) politicians to get it done, and
3) How they will synchronize it all with the railroad people.

Railroad unions will be very leery, because not only do they need *their* interests accounted for, they don't want a bunch of pilots opening a big can of worms with a lot of possible but not very predictable outcomes... they'll need to feel comfortable that any such attempt would not fall on the wrong side of the fence. As should we.
Totally agree. Mine was more a specific Q in regards to the COLA after amendable. And yeah, I can't believe the railroads got away with it, but I can......
Reply
Old 06-10-2023 | 12:01 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: B737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777

I would suggest that anyone proposing RLA amendment needs to specify:

3) How they will synchronize it all with the railroad people.

Railroad unions will be very leery, because not only do they need *their* interests accounted for, they don't want a bunch of pilots opening a big can of worms with a lot of possible but not very predictable outcomes... they'll need to feel comfortable that any such attempt would not fall on the wrong side of the fence. As should we.
Probably a naďve oversimplification, but: why not de-couple them altogether? The two industries are completely different business models and economics: why not split out the airways from the railways with an ALA ("Airways" Labor Act) totally separate from the RLA ("Railways" Labor Act)?

(Yes, I should read some history on the RLA to understand better how/why the aviation industry was rolled into the RLA together with the railroads....)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lewbronski
Southwest
73
09-11-2022 07:01 AM
Chowdah
=> United Contract 2022
1
07-27-2022 07:52 PM
AlettaOcean
United
59
07-20-2022 12:43 PM
Lewbronski
Southwest
0
07-18-2022 08:43 PM
Beewatcher2
United
751
06-25-2022 11:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices