Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
We need to amend the RLA >

We need to amend the RLA

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

We need to amend the RLA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2023 | 04:07 PM
  #11  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 72
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Earthboundmsfit
Geeze people I know it’s APC but the amount of defeatism is staggering.

Also…..why was NOTHING done in 2009-2010 when the dems had a supermajority in the senate and the presidency? What a wasted window.

I’m not a partisan guy but I’m SMH.

Additionally I’m still not buying that a bill to amend it wouldn’t be successful. I mean look at our neighbors to the north and how Westjet got a deal because they were about to strike less than a year after their contract was amendable.

Now THATs what you call results.

We aren’t talking France here where they strike every hour on the hour, we are talking Canada whose cultural is most similar to the US compared to any other nation.
and now compare Canadian carriers to us legacies in terms of work rules pay qol etc
Reply
Old 06-02-2023 | 04:28 PM
  #12  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,618
Likes: 558
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Earthboundmsfit
Geeze people I know it’s APC but the amount of defeatism is staggering.

Also…..why was NOTHING done in 2009-2010 when the dems had a supermajority in the senate and the presidency? What a wasted window.
As a notable Dem famously summarized: It's the Economy, Stupid.

Nobody who hopes to be elected again can torpedo the economy.

Also... many of today's Dems are fairly lukewarm on the more successful unions, by their success their members are comfortable middle or upper-middle class. That makes them more enemy than friend.


Not defeatism, but reality: we will not be allowed to willy-nilly shut down a major economic enabler or even a significant part of it on a whim. Not even in a localized geographic area... that's a problem with the airline industry, it's not like FDX, Arby's, or Riteaid where their competition is homogeneous across the land. Any of the top six airlines would have a devastating effect on their concentration areas if shut down. The SWA meltdown was actually mitigated by the fact that they don't really dominate any major metro areas.


Originally Posted by SteamedHams
Additionally I’m still not buying that a bill to amend it wouldn’t be successful. I mean look at our neighbors to the north and how Westjet got a deal because they were about to strike less than a year after their contract was amendable.

Now THATs what you call results.

We aren’t talking France here where they strike every hour on the hour, we are talking Canada who’s cultural is most similar to the US compared to any other nation.

They get paid roughly half of what we do? But they make up for it because their taxes are double?
Reply
Old 06-02-2023 | 05:36 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,716
Likes: 39
Default

Originally Posted by Earthboundmsfit
I'm so sick and tired of being hamstrung by the overbearing RLA, like I'm sure many others are.

It's long past time that we use our collective horsepower to get a bill through congress and signed by the president that amends the RLA significantly.

It's likely next to impossible to eliminate it, but realistic amendments could absolutely be made.

For example, automatic chronological benchmarks after a certain time period after the amendable date. For example, release to self help after 18 months if no deal is made.

If that's too much to ask, since the purpose is to keep commerce moving, then how about an automatic 10-15% payment penalty compounded per year past the amendable date when the companies drag on.

I'm not buying the excuse that we don't have enough political horsepower either. Pilots have more power now than they have had in decades with such a massive shortage.

Additionally, I remember someone saying a while back that ALPA is too afraid to go there for fear of coming out with something worse in the end if the winds shift.

I'm calling baloney on that. It's ALREADY aint labor as it is, it CAN'T get much worse than its current form.

Lastly, IF.......and that's a big IF......age 67 looked like it was about to be passed, wouldn't it be smart to attach these RLA amendments to an age 67 bill to help it get passed?

Frustrated AF. Sorry, but we just shouldn't be just along for the status quo and sit back and do nothing.
I believe DL has a provision that forces mediation if there’s no agreement within 90 days of the amendable date? That’s a pretty nice provision that speeds up the process but there is downside if it forces mediation in an economically challenging environment. Maybe a DL pilot could explain that provision? Does it force mediation or can one side or the other opt in or out?

Last edited by fcoolaiddrinker; 06-02-2023 at 06:15 PM.
Reply
Old 06-02-2023 | 05:38 PM
  #14  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,448
Likes: 256
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
I know the process is frustrating but keep in mind status quo works both ways. Management can’t just start violating a contract come amenable date if there’s a down economy.
.
Worth repeating.
Reply
Old 06-02-2023 | 05:46 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,716
Likes: 39
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
Worth repeating.
Ok. Your not always in a hurry. In some scenarios statues quo is a good thing. Assuming limited or no bailouts with the way it was structured would you be rushing to the table?
Reply
Old 06-02-2023 | 09:20 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 7
Default

I don’t know all the ins and outs but to me, we’re in the RLA because we’re in an industry that is critical to the economy such that it’s important to keep it going. We also got paid during COVID because we’re in an industry that is important to the economy such that the government didn’t want to fully shut us down. You give some. You take some.

I know I’m glad to have continued to get a pay check. A really good pay check at that.

ALSO, as others have pointed out, NO ONE is going to be sympathetic to the poor pilot making 6 figures. Did you know that only about 18% of American individuals make over $100k. Do you think the other 82% gives a rats ass about our plite when we make more than they do and get more days off per month (they’ll ignore the nights gone number, you have to know that).
Reply
Old 06-03-2023 | 02:03 AM
  #17  
Grumpyaviator's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,030
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by highfarfast
I don’t know all the ins and outs but to me, we’re in the RLA because we’re in an industry that is critical to the economy such that it’s important to keep it going. We also got paid during COVID because we’re in an industry that is important to the economy such that the government didn’t want to fully shut us down. You give some. You take some.

I know I’m glad to have continued to get a pay check. A really good pay check at that.

ALSO, as others have pointed out, NO ONE is going to be sympathetic to the poor pilot making 6 figures. Did you know that only about 18% of American individuals make over $100k. Do you think the other 82% gives a rats ass about our plite when we make more than they do and get more days off per month (they’ll ignore the nights gone number, you have to know that).
They’re not sympathetic to us but when airlines pull out of podunkville because there’s not enough pilots, or prices skyrocket because airlines can’t meet demand they’ll expect airlines to pay whatever it takes to crew the airplanes and provide reliable reasonable service.

btw, PPP wasn’t about keeping just airlines afloat, it was about keeping the economy going and helping people buy groceries and pay rent.
Reply
Old 06-03-2023 | 03:27 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by Grumpyaviator
They’re not sympathetic to us but when airlines pull out of podunkville because there’s not enough pilots, or prices skyrocket because airlines can’t meet demand they’ll expect airlines to pay whatever it takes to crew the airplanes and provide reliable reasonable service.

btw, PPP wasn’t about keeping just airlines afloat, it was about keeping the economy going and helping people buy groceries and pay rent.
Overdue major airline contracts aren’t what’s making service to small cities disappear
Reply
Old 06-03-2023 | 05:01 AM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 367
Likes: 62
Default

Never going to happen. The self righteous Congress makes $173,000 a year. Absolutely no sympathy for a self righteous pilot making double that. Our difficulties hammering out contracts will always come down to resolve. Our leverage is dictated by whims of the industry. After 911 = no power. Pilot shortage = power. Deal with it.
Reply
Old 06-03-2023 | 05:41 AM
  #20  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,160
Likes: 219
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

So, is there anything in the RLA preventing the unions from at least asking for COLA after the contract becomes amendable?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lewbronski
Southwest
73
09-11-2022 07:01 AM
Chowdah
=> United Contract 2022
1
07-27-2022 07:52 PM
AlettaOcean
United
59
07-20-2022 12:43 PM
Lewbronski
Southwest
0
07-18-2022 08:43 PM
Beewatcher2
United
751
06-25-2022 11:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices