Judge blocks B6/NK merger
#12
And my favorite bankruptcy schtick - if we don’t liquidate those pensions we will go out of business (signed off by a current supreme
court judge)
#13
Correct me if I’m wrong- but all those mergers were OMG - if we don’t merge , thousands of jobs will be lost and we may be bankrupt ( or already were in bankruptcy)
And my favorite bankruptcy schtick - if we don’t liquidate those pensions we will go out of business (signed off by a current supreme
court judge)
And my favorite bankruptcy schtick - if we don’t liquidate those pensions we will go out of business (signed off by a current supreme
court judge)
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,671
1) MadMax made the point that historically, the mergers were more about company survival (job PROTECTION) than what's best for the consumer. After all, they have to let the nation's number 1-6 largest airlines merge into the nation's 1-3 largest airlines. Has that proven good for the consumer?
NK seems to be in financial distress, that could potentially lead to job losses
2) It seems the judge here cited the Clayton Act, and ONLY been concerned with the consumer, and not at all with job protections. The nations 5-6 largeswt becoming 5, with a whopping 8% of market share when it's all over.
NK seems to be in financial distress, that could potentially lead to job losses
3) Administration that is supposedly "labor friendly" didn't allow a merger to go through.
NK seems to be in financial distress, that could potentially lead to job losses
See the irony?
NK seems to be in financial distress, that could potentially lead to job losses
2) It seems the judge here cited the Clayton Act, and ONLY been concerned with the consumer, and not at all with job protections. The nations 5-6 largeswt becoming 5, with a whopping 8% of market share when it's all over.
NK seems to be in financial distress, that could potentially lead to job losses
3) Administration that is supposedly "labor friendly" didn't allow a merger to go through.
NK seems to be in financial distress, that could potentially lead to job losses
See the irony?
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,000
1) MadMax made the point that historically, the mergers were more about company survival (job PROTECTION) than what's best for the consumer. After all, they have to let the nation's number 1-6 largest airlines merge into the nation's 1-3 largest airlines. Has that proven good for the consumer?
NK seems to be in financial distress, that could potentially lead to job losses
2) It seems the judge here cited the Clayton Act, and ONLY been concerned with the consumer, and not at all with job protections. The nations 5-6 largeswt becoming 5, with a whopping 8% of market share when it's all over.
NK seems to be in financial distress, that could potentially lead to job losses
3) Administration that is supposedly "labor friendly" didn't allow a merger to go through.
NK seems to be in financial distress, that could potentially lead to job losses
See the irony?
NK seems to be in financial distress, that could potentially lead to job losses
2) It seems the judge here cited the Clayton Act, and ONLY been concerned with the consumer, and not at all with job protections. The nations 5-6 largeswt becoming 5, with a whopping 8% of market share when it's all over.
NK seems to be in financial distress, that could potentially lead to job losses
3) Administration that is supposedly "labor friendly" didn't allow a merger to go through.
NK seems to be in financial distress, that could potentially lead to job losses
See the irony?
maybe some hope.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/exclu...110206763.html
#18
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 129
#20
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
newKnow
Mergers and Acquisitions
4
04-28-2008 07:08 PM