Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

LEPF DFR Lawsuit

Old 05-10-2026 | 05:13 AM
  #201  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 165
Default

Originally Posted by Bestglide
we also have more chemicals in our foods here in the U.S.
Poor quality and mass quantity. If only we could figure out why obesity and type 2 diabetes is at such a high rate in this country.🙄
Reply
Old 05-10-2026 | 01:43 PM
  #202  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 536
Likes: 140
Default

Another thing to consider is that pilots who were hired within the last decade haven’t had to pass an elaborate physical, only needing a Class 1 medical. As a result there are quite a few diseases one could have had as a new hire that may not bode well for longevity. It will be interesting to see how long the pilots of the future live, and until we get there, we really don’t know.

Longevity, as a metric, is important as it correlates with mental decline, so let’s look at how the US does in the latter. Not too well. We are in fact #8 in Alzheimer’s & Dementia deaths, with no “fly beyond 65” countries worse than us. See link:

https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/...ia/by-country/
Reply
Old 05-10-2026 | 04:39 PM
  #203  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by AF OneWire
Yes there is a statistical difference between the average life expectancy and an individuals life expectancy in middle age, due to infant mortality, accidents, etc. The fact that the average gender gap remains constant across nations, leads me to believe that the United States overall lower life expectancy (compared to some other industrialized nations) is due to our poor health. If you doubt this go to Walmart, then go to any store in Switzerland, Japan, Germany.

The US has the highest rate of obesity, highest caloric intake, highest sugar intake, and lowest level of physical activity.

I know you really want to fly until you die, but trying to argue that the US population (and thus pilots) are as healthily as the Japanese is disingenuous.
This whole argument is disingenuous, and it keeps coming up.

The US is *not* a homogeneous society, like Japan and Scandinavia which everyone contrasts us to.

US general population statistics is 100% garbage if applied to upper middle-class professionals, especially those who not only have the means but also actually have an incentive to be healthy to keep their jobs.

My premise is if .gov wants to deprive us of some of our liberty than do some science on the relevant demographic. It's OK if they take the time to do it right before potentially raising the age.
Reply
Old 05-10-2026 | 05:50 PM
  #204  
PineappleXpres's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 130
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
This whole argument is disingenuous, and it keeps coming up.

The US is *not* a homogeneous society, like Japan and Scandinavia which everyone contrasts us to.

US general population statistics is 100% garbage if applied to upper middle-class professionals, especially those who not only have the means but also actually have an incentive to be healthy to keep their jobs.

My premise is if .gov wants to deprive us of some of our liberty than do some science on the relevant demographic. It's OK if they take the time to do it right before potentially raising the age.
cog test is too risky for all of us. And I don’t want to fly with people who can’t handle new situations in their mid-late 60s. 65 is just fine.
Reply
Old 05-10-2026 | 06:47 PM
  #205  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by PineappleXpres
cog test is too risky for all of us. And I don’t want to fly with people who can’t handle new situations in their mid-late 60s. 65 is just fine.
I don't suggest opening the medical can of worms. Just a study based our current medical system and at what age it starts to come up short to some objective degree. Whatever that age is, most likely in the 65-68 range. Maybe even a hair lower.
Reply
Old 05-10-2026 | 08:01 PM
  #206  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 613
Likes: 142
Default

Originally Posted by PineappleXpres
cog test is too risky for all of us. And I don’t want to fly with people who can’t handle new situations in their mid-late 60s. 65 is just fine.
I have a family member in her 70’s who just had an annual medical. We have been concerned about her memory since she will tell you the same story 3x in one night, remind you numerous times of directions throughout the drive to places you’ve taken her dozens of times, and gets flustered very easily.
She passed her cog test with flying colors. She could be in a cockpit tomorrow if it wasn’t for this silly age restriction.
Reply
Old 05-10-2026 | 08:34 PM
  #207  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 763
Likes: 303
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I don't suggest opening the medical can of worms. Just a study based our current medical system and at what age it starts to come up short to some objective degree. Whatever that age is, most likely in the 65-68 range. Maybe even a hair lower.
What’s the point if you’re just gunna move it a year or two in either direction?
Reply
Old Yesterday | 12:31 PM
  #208  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 451
Likes: 94
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
This whole argument is disingenuous, and it keeps coming up.

The US is *not* a homogeneous society, like Japan and Scandinavia which everyone contrasts us to.

US general population statistics is 100% garbage if applied to upper middle-class professionals, especially those who not only have the means but also actually have an incentive to be healthy to keep their jobs.

My premise is if .gov wants to deprive us of some of our liberty than do some science on the relevant demographic. It's OK if they take the time to do it right before potentially raising the age.
You don’t have a “right” or “liberty” to fly an airplane.

We all considered the current restrictions good enough when we started. The current system is a good balance between the invasiveness of testing and a reasonable retirement age. Taking a cog test every year sounds absolutely terrible. Fail it because you didn’t get a good nights sleep and you’ll be in a months/years long struggle with the FAA medical bureaucracy.
Reply
Old Yesterday | 12:56 PM
  #209  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 45
Default

Originally Posted by 180ToAJ
I have a family member in her 70’s who just had an annual medical. We have been concerned about her memory since she will tell you the same story 3x in one night, remind you numerous times of directions throughout the drive to places you’ve taken her dozens of times, and gets flustered very easily.
She passed her cog test with flying colors. She could be in a cockpit tomorrow if it wasn’t for this silly age restriction.
Originally Posted by AF OneWire
You don’t have a “right” or “liberty” to fly an airplane.

We all considered the current restrictions good enough when we started. The current system is a good balance between the invasiveness of testing and a reasonable retirement age. Taking a cog test every year sounds absolutely terrible. Fail it because you didn’t get a good nights sleep and you’ll be in a months/years long struggle with the FAA medical bureaucracy.
Can 2 things be true at the same time.

I wouldn't want my family flying on an airplane with 180ToAJ's grandmother at the controls even though she passed the cog test, nor someone who couldn't pass due to "a good nights sleep". Have you seen a cog test? an example .... piece of paper with a circle drawn on it. Instructions say write the numbers in the circle like a clock face. My father wrote about eight numbers , 5 of which were in the northeast quadrant, a couple were outside the circle completely and he didn't even write about 4 numbers. Yet if you talked to him , he just seemed a little forgetful... akin to 180's grandmother. In looking looking at cog tests....it appears my dad took a mini cog. If one can't pass a mini cog you shouldn't be flying Period!

https://helpdementia.com/what-is-the...ccurate-is-it/

Reply
Old Yesterday | 01:21 PM
  #210  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 451
Likes: 94
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
Can 2 things be true at the same time.

I wouldn't want my family flying on an airplane with 180ToAJ's grandmother at the controls even though she passed the cog test, nor someone who couldn't pass due to "a good nights sleep". Have you seen a cog test? an example .... piece of paper with a circle drawn on it. Instructions say write the numbers in the circle like a clock face. My father wrote about eight numbers , 5 of which were in the northeast quadrant, a couple were outside the circle completely and he didn't even write about 4 numbers. Yet if you talked to him , he just seemed a little forgetful... akin to 180's grandmother. In looking looking at cog tests....it appears my dad took a mini cog. If one can't pass a mini cog you shouldn't be flying Period!

https://helpdementia.com/what-is-the...ccurate-is-it/
The FAA isn’t required to use that cog test. We would be opening up Pandora’s box to a cog test designed/approved by the FAA medical team.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kronan
FedEx
8
09-18-2020 06:39 PM
Fish on
Delta
10
07-16-2015 09:21 PM
cgull
United
55
08-19-2013 12:45 PM
CRJAV8OR
Major
36
03-27-2012 11:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices