![]() |
Originally Posted by Extenda
(Post 4023064)
a point: the stock market is irrelevant if you’re in the vast majority of Americans with zero equity in it.
but, yes, for people like us with a maxed out 401k every year we generally rise and fall with equities. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 4023060)
If you FAILED TO NOTICE the second photo which showed the Index 500 which demonstrates what an index of (duh) FIVE HUNDRED of the most prominent US companies including utilities and transportation and definitely DOES broadly represent the US economy and either didn’t understand that or didn’t notice it, I DO KNOW WHAT TO TELL YOU;
For the sake of your significant other and/or kids, let someone else, even if you have to pay a professional financial manager to do it, manage your 401k for you, so they aren’t having to support you in your old age. Thanks for the tip on financial advisors. I can assure you I'm not worried about my financial well being. Although I will agree with you heartily that 99 pct of people should not be making their own investment decisions. All of our investments outside of our investment real estate portfolio are managed by people who ain't me. |
Originally Posted by Extenda
(Post 4023064)
a point: the stock market is irrelevant if you’re in the vast majority of Americans with zero equity in it.
but, yes, for people like us with a maxed out 401k every year we generally rise and fall with equities. alt=""https://i.postimg.cc/dt5zX6Th/IMG-8009.jpg I simply posted two historical charts that demonstrated the economic impacts of the Iran war - the title of the thread - relative to two indexes that broadly reflect the economic consequences on most of our retirement accounts. Turbosina either couldn’t wait to play ‘gotcha’ to even look at the second photo or did look at it but didn’t understand it and proceeded to lecture me on the failings of the Dow, But in an era when it has never been easier to actually look up things like participation rates we ought to be careful about throwing around terms like “irrelevant”. Clearly those of us with more disposable income are significantly more invested in the stock market (probably Miata’s too) than those with less disposable income, Stock ownership by level of wealthWhile more than half of U.S. adults own stock, most don't own much. The wealthiest 1% hold 50% of stocks, worth $29 trillion, as of the fourth quarter of 2025, according to the Federal Reserve.If you expand to the top 10%, that group holds 87% of the stocks, valued at $44 trillion. In comparison, the rest of the country has seen stock ownership dwindle. The bottom 50% of Americans by net worth own only 1% of stocks, which is worth roughly $620 billion. |
Originally Posted by RippinClapBombs
(Post 4023036)
Well the assumption Iran’s largest buyer, China at 40%, had not prepared for such a scenario is laughable. They’ve spent the last decade focusing on energy independence by aggressively building oil storage and production capabilities. China “only has three months of oil reserves” is propaganda. Claiming 20% of the world’s oil supply flows through the Strait of Hormuz is technically propaganda—there’s plenty of available untapped supply. Iran was nothing more than sanctioned oil at a steep discount for the Chinese. This idea that the largest consumers of oil have not invested heavily in energy independence by sitting on untapped domestic oil supply is laughable as well.
Unlike in the US, the Chinese take a remarkably practical view of energy. They don't code gasoline as "conservative" and electric/ wind/ solar as "liberal" like we do. The last time I checked, energy sources don't have political allegiances, so precisely why we in the US have this distorted view is beyond me. |
Originally Posted by Turbosina
(Post 4023082)
I think most of this is absolutely right on. But China has also done a lot more than we have to get itself less dependent on oil. They've heavily subsidized electric, wind, and solar. I was just in PVG a few months back and Guangzhou before that...BYD (colossal Chinese electric car maker) has practically conquered the market with cars that put Teslas to shame. And in the countries where you can buy Chinese EVs, they have absolutely dominated. And they're really well made cars, too. I wish they were just cheap pieces of &&&& so I could feel better about US manufacturing capabilities, but Chinese automakers have advanced in leaps and bounds.
Unlike in the US, the Chinese take a remarkably practical view of energy. They don't code gasoline as "conservative" and electric/ wind/ solar as "liberal" like we do. The last time I checked, energy sources don't have political allegiances, so precisely why we in the US have this distorted view is beyond me. Also heavily invested in renewables. They're on track to have roughly 2x the available commercial electric power than the US by 2035 or so. Where cheap power is, manufacturing will follow. "AI" as well, if you buy the hype. |
Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
(Post 4023095)
China has been authorizing construction of 10+ large commercial nuclear reactors for years. Take 5-7 years to build. Unlike the US, they actually build them.
Also heavily invested in renewables. They're on track to have roughly 2x the available commercial electric power than the US by 2035 or so. Where cheap power is, manufacturing will follow. "AI" as well, if you buy the hype. |
Originally Posted by Turbosina
(Post 4023102)
Good point. I forgot nuclear. Another solution that would make us so much less dependent on whatever the latest Gulf conflict du jour is....
Georgia just built the first modern nuclear plant in 30 years. It can be done and I hope the government forces these AI companies to build them as a requirement for spamming dystopian data centers everywhere. |
Originally Posted by khergan
(Post 4023103)
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=57280
Georgia just built the first modern nuclear plant in 30 years. It can be done and I hope the government forces these AI companies to build them as a requirement for spamming dystopian data centers everywhere. |
Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
(Post 4023095)
China has been authorizing construction of 10+ large commercial nuclear reactors for years. Take 5-7 years to build. Unlike the US, they actually build them.
Also heavily invested in renewables. They're on track to have roughly 2x the available commercial electric power than the US by 2035 or so. Where cheap power is, manufacturing will follow. "AI" as well, if you buy the hype. "Chinese companies dominate not just batteries and grid hardware but also, increasingly, the software that manages energy flows. While some governments may be wary of giving Chinese firms access to their grids via the software, they are likely to keep buying the hardware since they have few affordable alternatives." While there may be some domestic pain, China may be positioned to benefit from a global oil shock: "Chinese companies dominate the manufacturing of nearly every component of a modern grid, including solar panels, high-voltage cables, transformers and batteries that store energy for later use. Even before the war in Iran, they were expanding abroad, helping countries build grids designed to meet the heavy electricity demands of artificial intelligence." https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/13/b...tery-grid.html |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 4022988)
Worked with Nazi Germany.
Worked with Japan (OK, took a couple of nukes too. Hopefully that won’t be necessary.) pretty sure those are the last two wars anyone has unequivocally won. We did not win WW2 because FDR made threats on twitter. Are you actually being serious? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:58 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands