Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Analyst says 20% probability of APA having to take a pay CUT! >

Analyst says 20% probability of APA having to take a pay CUT!

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Analyst says 20% probability of APA having to take a pay CUT!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-2007, 10:56 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
FlyByCable's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 337
Default Analyst says 20% probability of APA having to take a pay CUT!

Analyst Jamie Baker of JP Morgan suggests that contract talks at American Airlines aren't likely to produce a steep increase in employee wages, and could even result in a pay cut. Here's what he said in a report:
We ascribe a 50% probability to a wage increase no larger than 10%, 30% probability to wage-neutral contracts, and 20% probability to lower wages. Yes, we just said 'lower wages'. Management and pilot rhetoric likely to deteriorate next year, but pilots know they're walking a tightrope. Any involvement of an NMB-appointed mediator down the road would likely focus on the fact that AMR wage rates are meaningfully higher than market to begin with. Sure, pilots may ask for hefty increases, but the facts remain: AMR wage rates are already uncompetitive, and negotiations are taking place against a backdrop of economic uncertainty. Not too shabby of a position for management, or stakeholders, to be in, in our view.
FlyByCable is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 11:44 AM
  #2  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Default

As long as we continue to have an "oil friendly" administration who cares less about the workers, and more about making their "black gold" friends richer, it is you and I who will continue to pay for the majority of the fuel increases. Kind of interesting how oil continues to go higher and higher and the only people getting blamed for it is US!!! Sad, isn't it? Going to be really interesting to see how much profit the oil companies come out with especially when oil is $20 a bbl higher than last quarter!
ewrbasedpilot is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 12:18 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,889
Default

Jamie Baker... probably paid off by AMR press to spout such rosy outlooks.
aa73 is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 12:28 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
7576FO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: 737 CA MIA
Posts: 1,042
Default

Originally Posted by FlyByCable View Post
Analyst Jamie Baker of JP Morgan suggests that contract talks at American Airlines aren't likely to produce a steep increase in employee wages, and could even result in a pay cut. Here's what he said in a report:
We ascribe a 50% probability to a wage increase no larger than 10%, 30% probability to wage-neutral contracts, and 20% probability to lower wages. Yes, we just said 'lower wages'. Management and pilot rhetoric likely to deteriorate next year, but pilots know they're walking a tightrope. Any involvement of an NMB-appointed mediator down the road would likely focus on the fact that AMR wage rates are meaningfully higher than market to begin with. Sure, pilots may ask for hefty increases, but the facts remain: AMR wage rates are already uncompetitive, and negotiations are taking place against a backdrop of economic uncertainty. Not too shabby of a position for management, or stakeholders, to be in, in our view.
Dear Jamie Baker of JP Morgan you probably might want to rethink those percentages. Because 95,000 American employees dispense 10% of their wages each month to an Investment firm for retirement called um uh, uh i think it's oh, say, JP Morgan!
I bet your Supervisor Kicks 100% of your ass tomorrow.

Good news to all/any comm mulit instr rated pilots.
If my Union APA cannot arrange a pay raise and instead I take another pay cut, then there will be a job opening at American Airlines (Mine)

This is all management 101. And this is another analyst pulling numbers out of his arse.
7576FO is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 02:17 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Futureman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 100
Default

Originally Posted by ewrbasedpilot View Post
As long as we continue to have an "oil friendly" administration who cares less about the workers, and more about making their "black gold" friends richer, it is you and I who will continue to pay for the majority of the fuel increases. Kind of interesting how oil continues to go higher and higher and the only people getting blamed for it is US!!! Sad, isn't it? Going to be really interesting to see how much profit the oil companies come out with especially when oil is $20 a bbl higher than last quarter!
It's called supply and demand. Have you been reading the Daily Worker?
Futureman is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 05:30 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Futureman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 100
Default

Originally Posted by ewrbasedpilot View Post
As long as we continue to have an "oil friendly" administration who cares less about the workers, and more about making their "black gold" friends richer, it is you and I who will continue to pay for the majority of the fuel increases. Kind of interesting how oil continues to go higher and higher and the only people getting blamed for it is US!!! Sad, isn't it? Going to be really interesting to see how much profit the oil companies come out with especially when oil is $20 a bbl higher than last quarter!
Here is a proposal from your Dem buds:

"WASHINGTON -- Dealing with global warming will be painful, says one of the most powerful Democrats in Congress. To back up his claim he is proposing a recipe many people won't like _ a 50-cent gasoline tax, a carbon tax and scaling back tax breaks for some home owners. _A 50-cent-a-gallon tax on gasoline and jet fuel, phased in over five years, on top of existing taxes."

That should help the airline industry. This is being sponsored by Rep. Dingell (Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee). Have fun watching your Dems wreck the economy because they think the government can control the weather.
Futureman is offline  
Old 09-27-2007, 04:52 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

[QUOTE=Futureman;237772]Here is a proposal from your Dem buds:

"WASHINGTON -- Dealing with global warming will be painful, says one of the most powerful Democrats in Congress. To back up his claim he is proposing a recipe many people won't like _ a 50-cent gasoline tax, a carbon tax and scaling back tax breaks for some home owners. _A 50-cent-a-gallon tax on gasoline and jet fuel, phased in over five years, on top of existing taxes."

That should help the airline industry. This is being sponsored by Rep. Dingell (Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee). Have fun watching your Dems wreck the economy because they think the government can control the weather.[/QUOTE]

because the Repubs have done such a good job. I sure hope we don't get back to the times of 92-00 because those were bad times. especially with all of those trials...
Eric Stratton is offline  
Old 09-27-2007, 05:18 AM
  #8  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Default

Originally Posted by Futureman View Post
Here is a proposal from your Dem buds:

"WASHINGTON -- Dealing with global warming will be painful, says one of the most powerful Democrats in Congress. To back up his claim he is proposing a recipe many people won't like _ a 50-cent gasoline tax, a carbon tax and scaling back tax breaks for some home owners. _A 50-cent-a-gallon tax on gasoline and jet fuel, phased in over five years, on top of existing taxes."

That should help the airline industry. This is being sponsored by Rep. Dingell (Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee). Have fun watching your Dems wreck the economy because they think the government can control the weather.
Ha Ha!! I watched Bush take a SURPLUS and throw it all away. I've watched oil go through the roof, and I've watched the airlines get decimated......all under his highness Georgia boy. Yet CEO's and oil companies are making so much money they don't make banks big enough to store it all, and Bush blames US for this big problem. But then again, we have this really popular war that George got us into, that's cost us over 3800 lives and almost a half trillion dollars with NO END IN SIGHT (the so-called "war" plan that he won the election on is still unkown to everyone, including himself), but hey, I don't mind taking paycuts so guys like him and Cheney can make money in the oil industry, do you? I've also watched his administration whack the contollers salaries and benefits (we paid for that one dearly over the summer too!!! YAHOO!!! ). Yep, the republicans have been wonderful for this industry, haven't they?
ewrbasedpilot is offline  
Old 09-27-2007, 05:21 AM
  #9  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Default

Originally Posted by Futureman View Post
It's called supply and demand. Have you been reading the Daily Worker?
Gee, has the demand quadrupled in the last couple of years? I don't hardly think so. How many refineries have been built with all these oil profits? Where is Halliburtons new headquarters going to be? How convenient. HMMMMM.........
ewrbasedpilot is offline  
Old 09-27-2007, 06:38 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
av8r4aa's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: Lazy-boy Captain
Posts: 242
Default My Math

I can assure Jamie, with a 20 % paycut ,100% of the metal
WILL NOT MOVE!!!!!!!
av8r4aa is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
flyboy
JetBlue
9
02-12-2006 07:37 PM
Sir James
Major
7
11-05-2005 03:28 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-22-2005 08:09 AM
SWAjet
Major
7
05-23-2005 08:58 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices