Alaska Guys?
#22
Banned
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Or 80 for 80 for 80.
Anyone remember that?
Let's not forget that QX CRJ drivers are currently the highest paid CRJ operators in the U.S. Now, Angle Lake is going to give them a choice: Gut their pay like they did to Alaska pilots OR fly Ejets for current book.
You tell me how that will pan out.
#23
AAG management is crazy if they think they will get significant cuts from QX pilots. There is no arbitration clause like AS pilots had in their former contract, so how is Angle Lake going to force a pay cut down everyone's throat?
Also, E-Jets for CRJ-700 pay won't be happening either. Since everyone knows the E-Jets would be CRJ replacements and not growth, it becomes extremely difficult for management to sell the idea of more seats for the same pay. I know precisely zero pilots at QX who would vote for such a plan.
Also, E-Jets for CRJ-700 pay won't be happening either. Since everyone knows the E-Jets would be CRJ replacements and not growth, it becomes extremely difficult for management to sell the idea of more seats for the same pay. I know precisely zero pilots at QX who would vote for such a plan.
#24
Actually, I don't remember that. Why would the pilot group of one airline make a proposal to the management of another? flame on....
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
I don't remember that MD-80 scenario either. That sounds like utter BS from a QX hater looking to incite animosity toward us. Let's hear your source for that one.
We are actually seeking to negotiate with the Airgroup from a united front with Alaska. Remember, the idea isn't to drag us down like you guys were (don't get me started on that one...), but rather to restore you guys WITH retro pay, etc. In-fighting within the Airgroup just plays into their hands.
Besides, you guys got a $25 Xmas bonus! We only got $16
We are actually seeking to negotiate with the Airgroup from a united front with Alaska. Remember, the idea isn't to drag us down like you guys were (don't get me started on that one...), but rather to restore you guys WITH retro pay, etc. In-fighting within the Airgroup just plays into their hands.
Besides, you guys got a $25 Xmas bonus! We only got $16
#26
I don't remember that MD-80 scenario either. That sounds like utter BS from a QX hater looking to incite animosity toward us. Let's hear your source for that one.
We are actually seeking to negotiate with the Airgroup from a united front with Alaska. Remember, the idea isn't to drag us down like you guys were (don't get me started on that one...), but rather to restore you guys WITH retro pay, etc. In-fighting within the Airgroup just plays into their hands.
Besides, you guys got a $25 Xmas bonus! We only got $16
We are actually seeking to negotiate with the Airgroup from a united front with Alaska. Remember, the idea isn't to drag us down like you guys were (don't get me started on that one...), but rather to restore you guys WITH retro pay, etc. In-fighting within the Airgroup just plays into their hands.
Besides, you guys got a $25 Xmas bonus! We only got $16

#27
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: A320 CA
#30
There are a lot of ex QX guys here.... There really is no distain for QX here... One or two ex mil types..
Keep the pay up there boys!!!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post


Hmmmmm...Running the wires in KCI, Running off the runway in BUR and MDW...Yep THE best safety record.....................

