Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Pilot career

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2006, 07:01 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: DFW A320 FO
Posts: 586
Default

Originally Posted by ryane946
I am 22, a CFII, and I have over 700TT and I intend on hiring on at a regional in the next several months.
I pick a decent, solid regional with decent pay and upgrade times (Skywest, Republic, AWAC, ExpressJet, etc..)
Spend 2-3 years as an FO. Suck it up and deal with the pay. I am young enough that 30,000 is plently for 2nd,3rd year.
Upgrade to captain. Spend another 3 years flying. Given all the upgrade times I saw, this is a reasonable expectation.

So now I am 27, making at least 65K, I would potentially have 5000TT, over 3000 PIC. I think these are reasonable expectations. Now I could stay at this regional job for a few more years if I desired to (make reasonable pay for being young and rack up experience), or I could go to a major.
Even in the poor hiring conditions of today, I have to believe that 5000TT, 3000PIC is plently for Southwest, FedEx, UPS, JetBlue, AirTran, Frontier, anyother "Major" that is hiring. Spend a few years as starting FO pay, and then sometime around age 30-35, I would cross the 100K threshold. My goal, and I get to do something I love.

Anything comes up, I have a degree in Aerospace Engineering and I will just get a job in that field.
Well that sounds exactly like my plan from the late 80's. Now I'm a junior reserve at a regional after 14 yrs in the airline industry. Got the same degree, but try getting a job like that w/ no experience and many years removed from school. Of course my timing has flat out stunk and I've bypassed some "better" opportunities in the name of family, but it just ain't that easy. That said, you also just described many pilots' careers who were in the queue at a different point in history, so it just might work out for you.

Bottom line is you won't know 'til you try so go for it - but only if this is really what you want to do.
swaayze is offline  
Old 02-16-2006, 09:14 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: C47 PIC/747-400 SIC
Posts: 2,100
Default

I flew 10 years in DC-3s(night freight on call), 2 more in CV340s(great ship),now I'm on the 727,flying for a spunky ,little non-sched. Moral of the story,just do it! There are no guarantees about anything, if you want to be a pilot,be a pilot! If you want iron clad security, and a guaranteed pension,go get a civil service job, (or fly for UPS!). This career has taken me from JFK to Bang-kok, and every little windswept 3AM strip in between,but the beauty I have seen,and the satisfaction I have experienced in these cockpits is without price. I hope your master plan works out for you,I really do, just follow your own inner compass, and go for it.Good luck!God bless!
727C47 is offline  
Old 02-16-2006, 09:33 AM
  #23  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by Joel Payne
The best bet is to send your kids to CEO school, majoring in thievery.
That's a good funny
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-16-2006, 11:45 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 222
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
This is one of my pet peeves with our labor system...our payscales depend on a) You staying with the same company your whole life and b) that company staying solvent your whole life.

Basically you work now for a hamburger on Tuesday...

The modern nomad-bandit managers in our industry (and most others) have figured this system out to their unscrupulous advantage...they'll gladly TAKE your labor now, but cash out the options and file Ch.11 long before they have to make good on any long term promises. Jet Blue has a nice labor advantage...ALL their employees are at the bottom of the scale...do you think JB management is planning on sticking around to pay all those suckers their 12 year CA pay? Hmmm.

My suggestion would be to strike a balance...have national standards in pay, but not longevity based. The way it would work is you get paid based on your position (CA,FO,FE) and the revenue capacity of the aircraft (seats). This pay is NOT affected by longevity in any way.

Now, seniority is still in place at each carrier, and senior guys still get paid more cuz they bid bigger equipment (they also get better bases & QOL).

What this does is to totally eliminate the market incentive to bankrupt an "Old" carrier and replace it with a JB. Any new carrier will still have to pay the national rate for an A320 captain...you don't get him for pennies on the dollar just because your company is so new that captains only have 18 months longevity....

By preserving company seniority, pilots are encouraged to do their best to ensure that their carrier succeeds and grows, otherwise they start at the bottom somewhere else. But the bottom is still livable based on the economics of the product, not a tenure-skewed longevity system.

This would obviously have to be phased in over a period of time...
So you get paid the same whether you are a first year FO or a tenth year FO flying the same equipment?

I agree with you - being paid the same for doing the same job irrespective of the number of years of service makes sense. After all you are equally responsible for performing your duties the first year or the second, or third, etc. You are expected to be a professional and do your job in the same manner at all times. So the compensation should remain the same.

I'd go a step further and say get rid of this whole seniority thing. Publish minimums and hire at all levels. Eliminate upgrades and promotions.

Here's how it works. Hire everyone off the street. For instance the minimums for a 737 FO may be 1,000 PIC and 3,000 total; and for a 747 CA 12,000 total. I picked numbers out of a hat – I may be off.

The point is - you get hired for a position and you keep that position for life. There are no upgrades or promotions. The pay may be adjusted each year for inflation (or even market conditions), but all pilots flying the same equipment at the same seat make exactly the same money. (Of course if the company eliminates a certain type of airplane then they must move you to an equivalent or higher paying seat on another type. This will be the only exception of the "no-promotions" rule.)

You want to fly bigger equipment for more money or upgrade for more money? You can apply for that position like everyone else as long as you meet the minimums. Well, maybe you automatically pass the HR interview as an existing employee, but that's it. After that the best candidate for the job gets the job based on an extensive evaluation. No matter if you are an existing employee or off the street.

The question is - how do you award lines if there is no seniority? Simple, let everyone bid pretty much like they bid today by listing all the lines in order of preference. Then use a computer program to allocate lines so that the final solution is optimal. E.g. if there are 50 pilots and 50 lines, if a pilot gets their first choice this has a score of 1; second choice, a score of 2, etc. Then you need to find a solution where after allocating everyone the sum of everyone's score is minimal. In this case 50 will be the lowest sum (if everyone got their first choice) which is unlikely, and 2,500 will be the highest sum if everyone got their last choice. The computer program can find a solution with the lowest sum – it is fairly simple to write an algorithm to accomplish this.

You can refine this even more. Rate all lines by how often people like to pick them. Then add extra pay above and beyond the base pay to entice people to bid on lines that people don't bid on often. E.g. a nice line with all weekends off will be at base pay. Another line with 2 Saturdays and 2 Sundays flying will be base pay + 500 dollars. If people don't bid enough, increase next bid period to base pay + 600, etc. Eventually you'll get people to bid for this line just as much as the line with no weekends if you raise the money enough. So by making these adjustments all lines will be equally desirable and most people will get one of their top few choices. So the young guy without a family who wants to maximize his income will bid on the line with 2 Saturdays and 2 Sundays flying, while another guy who isn't chasing the money so much and prefers weekends at home can bid on the lower paying "no-weekends-away" lines.

This will be fair I think.

The rate will be set to the average industry rate for the respective seat and equipment. The good news is that you won't work for peanuts only to lose your medial or see your company fold and never see the promised big bucks. The bad news is that you'll never get to make the big bucks. Rather you'll start in the middle and stay there.

Also, people won't be married to their airline. If you have the experience and if you have what it takes to fly the left seat of a 747 you get hired right there – no going back to the bottom of a regional.

Rewarding people for staying with the company the longest by paying them more and giving them higher seniority really makes no sense to me. Not to mention that staying at the same company the longest is mostly a function of luck.

OK, sorry for the long post – I am done. You can lynch me now

Last edited by sgrd0q; 02-16-2006 at 11:50 AM.
sgrd0q is offline  
Old 02-16-2006, 12:06 PM
  #25  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by sgrd0q

The rate will be set to the average industry rate for the respective seat and equipment. The good news is that you won't work for peanuts only to lose your medial or see your company fold and never see the promised big bucks. The bad news is that you'll never get to make the big bucks. Rather you'll start in the middle and stay there.
I'll take it! The current system requires you to work your @ss for small bucks in hopes of making big bucks later...even if you do make the big bucks someday, the net result is a lifetime average in the middle. Of course today's management knows how to ensure that they don't EVER have to pay out the big bucks...so I'll take middle right now, instead of a "promise" for more later...but my idea of "middle" might not be the same as say, Jet Blue's...the payscale would be based on the economics of the equipment, and most of the equipment can make a LOT of money

Obviously it would have to phased in to protect the senior guys.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-22-2006, 08:29 PM
  #26  
FlySmarterNotHarder
 
UGBSM's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: fifi flyer
Posts: 553
Default

Originally Posted by ryane946

...So now I am 27, making at least 65K,... and then sometime around age 30-35, I would cross the 100K threshold.... My goal, and I get to do something I love.

Ok, you asked for advice. Quit making plans like that. If you wanna get on this roller coaster, then you are just along for the ride. If you love it... great. Whether you still do 25 years from now doesn't matter, you're stuck with it, unless you want to start all over again.

Don't be discouraged. The world needs ditch-diggers and the world needs flying bus drivers and the money is about the same. Do what you want.

You wanna make money? Be a doctor, lawyer, CEO, or business owner. Airline pilot is not in that class anymore. Just so you know.

Oh, BTW. You are 22 now and your goal is to make 100K some 15 years from now? In 2021? Hmmmm... you really do love flying more than money.
UGBSM is offline  
Old 02-23-2006, 04:47 AM
  #27  
Self Employed.
 
SkyHigh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 7,119
Default Plans

ryane946 ,

Keep in mind that aviation loves people with well laid plans so it can mess with them. You have two eggs (pilot and aerospace engineer) in one basket (aviation). The odds of you enjoying a long and unbroken career are very slim and remember that your back up plan is in the same industry. My father is an Aerospace Engineer too and has been laid off more than me. Your expectations might work out but my guess is that the odds are one in ten. If you don't come up with a better back up plan then we might be seeing you at the Home-Depot.

Good Luck,

SkyHigh
SkyHigh is offline  
Old 02-24-2006, 08:22 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Frank Rizzo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: 717 Capt.
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by GuppyPuppy
I know many pilots who have decided to make it a career because they can't afford to take a 50%+ paycut to go to a place like Airtran or JB.GP
That is very short sighted thinking.

After 3 yrs at AirTran you'll be making 120K. Suck it up.
Frank Rizzo is offline  
Old 02-24-2006, 08:31 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KiloAlpha's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: AA A320
Posts: 1,624
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Rizzo
That is very short sighted thinking.

After 3 yrs at AirTran you'll be making 120K. Suck it up.

According to APC, a 3 yr CA at AirTran probably earns around $95K...
KiloAlpha is offline  
Old 02-25-2006, 02:54 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Frank Rizzo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: 717 Capt.
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
According to APC, a 3 yr CA at AirTran probably earns around $95K...
If you rely on what APC says, you're missing a lot.

You're looking at raw numbers, there is a lot more to our contract than the payscales. Every month there is a significant amount of soft pay.

Trip rigs, duty rigs, minimum duty period guarantees, re -assignments and the like add a lot to your paycheck. Reserve life sucks, but these guys have been known to make 120+ credit hrs a month.

I've been here 8 yrs ($133/hr) and made just under $155K last year, and I'm as lazy as they come, not including 25K in stock options that I cashed in.
Frank Rizzo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Herc130AV8R
Military
25
03-22-2008 05:22 PM
Michieru
Flight Schools and Training
10
08-15-2006 09:59 PM
kc0616
Flight Schools and Training
13
05-01-2006 09:05 AM
ryane946
Regional
15
02-16-2006 05:03 PM
imoses44
Flight Schools and Training
1
12-30-2005 07:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices