Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

UAL seniority numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2008, 09:45 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by 7576United View Post
Third, no, pay doesn't suck everywhere. Compare your w2 with Lufthansa with various other international carriers.
Compare YOUR W2 to a LH, AF, or KLM pilot. A U.S. "legacy" CA's pay is lame, your going to compare an RJ pilot's?
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 04:36 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by 767pilot View Post
It happened before that. Your scope clause was sealed tight and the company couldn't have UAX's with jets. The company said that if the pilots played ball, they would get more 747-400' and "after all, which would you rather fly, that or an RJ? Just let us buy them some RJ's but we can't afford both". Turns out it was a lie, go figure. The pilots voted yes and how many -400's have you gotten since then? None, and they went ahead and financed RJ's for ACA anyhow. Check your early '90's union history.
Check my history? I was there! The RJ vote was in 1997, not "early 90's hstory". The agreement was for 50 seaters and their number was tied to the number of mainline aircraft flying. Again, IT WAS THE BANKRUPTCY that erased the scope. Basically allows unlimited 70 seaters as long as UAX block hours do not exceed mainline block hours. It is a license to steal, and in fact stole thousands of mainline jobs and allows 170Homie to brag about his state of the art Replacement Jet.

Last edited by jsled; 07-03-2008 at 04:43 AM.
jsled is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 04:38 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver View Post
Compare YOUR W2 to a LH, AF, or KLM pilot. A U.S. "legacy" CA's pay is lame, your going to compare an RJ pilot's?
My pay may be lame, but at least I don't have to pay the mortgage on RJ pay......yet.
jsled is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 04:47 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by Short Bus Drive View Post
How many seats does the Q400 have?
Props are for boats. But seriously, you gonna fly a Q400 from IAH to ORD?
jsled is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 04:57 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by 170Homie View Post
Per management, look for AA and Continental to drop scope soon, GUARENTEED!
It's up to mainline drivers and your union to keep scope alive, but in this economic enviroment, not sure there's a leg to stand on. If scope is relieved, look for 190's in express colors docking at a jetbridge near you soon.
Nothing is guaranteed. Just ask the guys that left good pilot jobs at UPS, FDX, and SWA in the 1990's because they "won the lottery" and got hired at a major airline about guarantees. Perhaps you need a little more experience and the benefit of hindsight to properly gauge this industry. I am sure you would love to shortcut the system and start flying the 190 at the expense of a mainline pilot's job. In the 1980's there was alot of that going on. Only then it was called being a scab.

Last edited by jsled; 07-03-2008 at 05:39 AM.
jsled is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 06:47 AM
  #36  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 83
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver View Post
Compare YOUR W2 to a LH, AF, or KLM pilot. A U.S. "legacy" CA's pay is lame, your going to compare an RJ pilot's?
You're completely missing my point. I agree, our pay sucks...just ask my wife. What I'm trying to make him understand is that it doesn't have to be this way. The idea that 'descent salaries are gone forever' is a bunch of crap in my book. We'll get better pay when we step up and demand better pay.
7576United is offline  
Old 07-06-2008, 09:05 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: E-170/175 FO
Posts: 165
Default

...And you all have completely missed my point. Like I said in my FIRST post, I am not gloating, bragging, insert verb here_________. I have nothing but respect for the (mainline) guys who have paved the way but let's make one thing clear. I was not in the meeting when management (or lack there of) approved the planes I fly or the routes i'm on. I DID NOT steal any route structure or installed 70+ seaters on those routes. I simply applied to a company that happens to supply that to mainline carriers.

When I said I am happy being where I am and have no intention of going mainline, I meant just that. I do not speak for every RJ driver out there. Why would I want to go to a mainline carrier, further my risk of fulrough, be on reserve for a year plus, wait for my # to be called a decade later for upgrade etc. for a few bucks more and a worse QOL.

Be CLEAR, I am NOT bragging about a freakin' plane, who cares! Oh, and I DO want more money and contract perks, we all do, and I would be the first one in line with sticks and signs to make sure we ALL get what we deserve. I was just stating that I love my job, love what I do, and i'm tired of people trying to take the simple joys left in this industry from me by trying to make me feel the recipricol. Sorry for the rant, gotta go fly and love it at the same time.
170Homie is offline  
Old 07-06-2008, 09:20 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KingAirPIC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 307
Default

Originally Posted by 170Homie View Post
Uhh, sorry to break it to you guys but the regional life actually isn't that bad anymore.
  • I haven't had a pairing yet that has had more than 3-4 legs a day, MAYBE.
  • We only fly to mainline fields ie: DFW, JFK, MIA etc. (At least on the 170.)
  • My average flight is not 18 to 35 min. it's more like 2:15 to 3:15 block on average.
  • I had 17 days off last month with about 94 credit hours (pretty senior, if you call only 3 years senior)
  • My quality of life is great! Never spent a day on reserve.
    Now my point is not to gloat or rub anyone the wrong way, My 2 best friends are caught up in the cluster at UAL and I feel for EACH and EVERY one of you affected, but don't knock the regionals. OK, Pay sucks I admit and we need better contracts, duly noted, but I love my job. This is not your grandaddy's commuter anymore.

    PS: UAL pilots are welcome on my JS anytime!

    I don't think this is true for most regional pilots. For sure some but most not. At least not in its entirety. I believe the writer is on the E170 which would be a stretch to call it a regional aircraft. Most of us don't fly those. Air Canada added it to their mainline fleet which is where it belongs.
    KingAirPIC is offline  
    Old 07-06-2008, 09:36 AM
      #39  
    Gets Weekends Off
     
    Joined APC: Feb 2006
    Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
    Posts: 3,732
    Default

    Originally Posted by 170Homie View Post
    ...And you all have completely missed my point. Like I said in my FIRST post, I am not gloating, bragging, insert verb here_________. I have nothing but respect for the (mainline) guys who have paved the way but let's make one thing clear. I was not in the meeting when management (or lack there of) approved the planes I fly or the routes i'm on. I DID NOT steal any route structure or installed 70+ seaters on those routes. I simply applied to a company that happens to supply that to mainline carriers.

    When I said I am happy being where I am and have no intention of going mainline, I meant just that. I do not speak for every RJ driver out there. Why would I want to go to a mainline carrier, further my risk of fulrough, be on reserve for a year plus, wait for my # to be called a decade later for upgrade etc. for a few bucks more and a worse QOL.

    Be CLEAR, I am NOT bragging about a freakin' plane, who cares! Oh, and I DO want more money and contract perks, we all do, and I would be the first one in line with sticks and signs to make sure we ALL get what we deserve. I was just stating that I love my job, love what I do, and i'm tired of people trying to take the simple joys left in this industry from me by trying to make me feel the recipricol. Sorry for the rant, gotta go fly and love it at the same time.
    If you think that unpleasant things that happen at a legacy WON'T happen to you at a regional, you might be in for a shock later on.

    Hopefully not, but to think a regional pilot is impervious to woes of a mainline guy, well........
    dojetdriver is offline  
    Old 07-06-2008, 11:11 AM
      #40  
    Gets Weekends Off
     
    Joined APC: Jun 2008
    Position: E-170/175 FO
    Posts: 165
    Default

    Originally Posted by dojetdriver View Post
    If you think that unpleasant things that happen at a legacy WON'T happen to you at a regional, you might be in for a shock later on.

    Hopefully not, but to think a regional pilot is impervious to woes of a mainline guy, well........

    Whoa.. Who said anything about safe. No one is safe in this enviroment. At this time it's just a little "safer" than the mainline, right now. And I would like to move on to bigger and better someday, but for me, bigger and better is Emirates or Cathay not Delta or United.
    170Homie is offline  
    Related Topics
    Thread
    Thread Starter
    Forum
    Replies
    Last Post
    grant123
    Major
    1
    01-21-2008 10:51 AM
    AAflyer
    Major
    22
    10-28-2007 03:14 AM
    31wins
    Cargo
    181
    09-25-2007 05:17 PM
    mike734
    Major
    15
    09-17-2007 12:03 PM
    LAfrequentflyer
    Hangar Talk
    2
    02-01-2006 05:39 AM

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On



    Your Privacy Choices