Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Hotels dumping Flight Crews >

Hotels dumping Flight Crews

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Hotels dumping Flight Crews

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2006 | 10:24 PM
  #31  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,557
Likes: 31
From: B777/CA retired
Default

Poundstone, you have no clue. We stay where we can get the best rest for the money. That means Holiday Inn or better, more often the better. Certain cities like LAS or ORD it is tough to get the company to pay the rack rates for a Radisson type hotel but when they try to go cheap then we have crew issues like the afore mentioned hooker or sports tournament going on. You haven't lived unless you are a day sleeper with a Under 14 Soccer tournament going on during your stay. I spend over 1/3 of my nights away from home each year. I will not stay at a Motel 6 on my dime, I will not on the company's either. It's all about rest. I spend up to 52 hours on a layover, I will not let my quality of life be compromised to save the company $10 a night. Luckily most contacts in this industry reflect that. Too bad if you fly or work for a low rent scumbag outfit that screws you over in hotels accomodation. Hell, even at Zantop we had decent hotels.
Reply
Old 03-24-2006 | 11:58 PM
  #32  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Captain B744
Default

Originally Posted by Poundstone
Phil Squares, thank you for your reply.

In fact, your reply illustrates precisely a point I'd like to make.

You detail what your contract specifies regarding the type of rest accomodation (hotel) crews can use. Congratulations -- you seem to have a fine contract in that regard.

But I'm not arguing about what contracts should or shouldn't say about crew rest accomodations. Over time, contracts are mostly not a reflection of how tough the negotiators were at the table, but rather what the market would bear. I'm making the point that the only arbiter that matters -- the market -- is going to force most flight crew members (in the US, anyway) into something like a Motel 6.

Why? Well, read my previous post.
Again, I disagree. All it takes is one cancelled/delayed flight due to lack of "acceptable" crew rest or fatigue and the airline has lost all it saved. It's kind of akin to the old expression, "penny wise pound foolish"!

As a former military pilot, I don't buy your comparison fo the military vs. civilian pilot. They are two completely two different worlds. Different missions, different mission criteria and a different set of standards. If you were to use your comparison, then where's my ejection seat? It doesn't work quite the you have it!

Last edited by phil squares; 03-25-2006 at 12:01 AM.
Reply
Old 03-25-2006 | 12:57 AM
  #33  
captjns's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
10M Airline Miles
20 Years
150 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,232
Likes: 62
From: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Default

Originally Posted by Poundstone
Does it really matter if flight crews have to give up staying at a good-quality hotel and start staying at a Motel 6? After all, what they need is a bed, right?
Poundstone it goes deeper than a bed to sleep in along with bed bugs.

Security and safety for the entire crew – Hotels we layover must provide access to hotel rooms through their lobbies. A hotel key is required to access the hotel from the parking lot. No hotel rooms shall have direct access from the parking lot. All rooms will be on the second floor or higher for additional security. I along with my fellow crewmembers want to feel as safe and secure as if we were in our own homes.

Layovers – On a short layover the hotel must have convenient van service to and from the airport 24 hours a day whether via their own van, or a contract van service with due dispatch. On a long layover, the hotel must not be located on a highway where one his held hostage to the property for 48 up to hours. In a major city it should be off the airport within the city center. If not in a major city then near points of interest.

Food – I personally don’t want Denny’s to be the only restaurant when it comes to dining while on a 48 hour layover. As previously posted the hotel should be located with other dining establishments close and accessible to the hotel.

If you are on the road as much as airline crews… please feel free to stay at Tom Bodette’s place. I’m sure he’ll leave the light on for you and provide you with a host of bugs for your company and enjoyment.

As for me, and my fellow crewmembers, we will be treated with the respect and dignity that we accord to our passengers. Anything less is unacceptable!
Reply
Old 03-25-2006 | 02:06 AM
  #34  
Poundstone
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Captjns, thank you for your posting. It really illustrates precisely the points I've tried to make.

You go into some detail regarding the types of accomodation that are acceptable under your current contract: van service, access only through lobbies, located near the airport or "points of interest," etc. You and others here have been pretty clear in pointing out what you're entitled to under your contracts. I get it.

But what I'm talking about isn't what pilots are entitled to under their current contracts. I'm talking about the future.

Yes, a future where those detailed privileges in your current contract concerning accomodation will be held up for revision by a management determined to achieve cost savings across the board. A future where management will assert that a significantly less expensive form of accomodation can suffice for the "crew rest" function. A future where pilot reps who insist on accomodation "near points of interest" or "appropriate for our dignity and professionalism" will either receive a stony stare from management or be laughed out of the room.

Pilots who see their salaries being slashed to the equivalent of a big-city policeman's and their pension plans gutted will have to ask themselves "what's more important: staying at a Hyatt or saving something of my pension plan?" I'm sure what the answer is among the pilot rank and file. Pilot reps who assert there's an absolute safety inperative that requires them to be lodged at mid-scale hotels will increasingly be called upon by management to justify that assertion. I think they will be unable to convincingly defend their position.

Ask yourself a question: where do long-distance bus drivers sleep? Ask yourself another question: why should pilots sleep anywhere else?
Reply
Old 03-25-2006 | 03:21 AM
  #35  
captjns's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
10M Airline Miles
20 Years
150 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,232
Likes: 62
From: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Default

Originally Posted by Poundstone
Yes, a future where those detailed privileges in your current contract concerning accomodation will be held up for revision by a management determined to achieve cost savings across the board.

Ask yourself a question: where do long-distance bus drivers sleep? Ask yourself another question: why should pilots sleep anywhere else?
Accomodations are not a privilege... It is a right. Airlines expect safe and secure carriage of thier passengers to their destinations. It is the crewmembers' right to have the same expectations of treatment from their employers.

I can't comment, nor is it my concern where bus drivers layover. They don't have the additional responsibilities of the welfare of fellow crewmembers while on a 5 day trip.

While I don't mean to diminish the responsibility of bus drivers, but they can pull off the road when their engines fail. We don't have the same luxury. Bus drivers can radio ahead to have the police meet them in a matter of minutes if a passenger becomes unruly. We don't have that luxury either.

If bus drivers have problems with their hotels, let them bring it to the attention of their union reps. This is not the proper forum to address such issues.
Reply
Old 03-25-2006 | 04:19 AM
  #36  
Ranger's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
From: MD-11/10 Captain
Default

You're wasting a lot of ketstrokes for nothing. He's just so right that he can't wait to let everybody know it. It must be nice.
Reply
Old 03-25-2006 | 04:25 AM
  #37  
fireman0174's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 1
From: Retired 121 pilot
Default

Originally Posted by Poundstone
Ask yourself a question: where do long-distance bus drivers sleep? Ask yourself another question: why should pilots sleep anywhere else?
Hey, how about George Bush saving taxpayers money by using Motel 6?
Reply
Old 03-25-2006 | 06:07 AM
  #38  
calcapt's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
From: 737 Captain
Default

Is Poundstone the illegitimate son of SkyHigh? I thought SkyHigh had the market cornered on pessimism, negativity and idiotic comments. I think Poundstone is just a SkyHigh in training - 17 posts for Pound and over 700 for Sky. Poundstone is an idiot apprentice for sure - but he is off to a good start!

Last edited by calcapt; 03-25-2006 at 06:09 AM.
Reply
Old 03-25-2006 | 06:48 AM
  #39  
dckozak's Avatar
done, gone skiing
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 0
From: Rocking chair
Talking Think of the possibilities

How about this.
SkyHigh and Poundsand in the cockpit of the same airplane. What would they talk about?? How lucky they are to be there?? Or how unworthy they are to be paid at all?? Maybe they would volunteer to stay at the Motel 6 to save the company money, than personally give the money saved to the passengers they're flying because they've paid so much already and need (the) break.
They could both agree how easy it is, because the autopilot does the hard part. Than after the landing, apologize to the passengers as they deplane that they aren't really worthy to fly but are humbled by the fact that someone was willing to fly on an airplane they flew.
Reply
Old 03-25-2006 | 07:05 AM
  #40  
calcapt's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
From: 737 Captain
Default Scary

Originally Posted by dckozak
SkyHigh and Poundsand in the cockpit of the same airplane.

The master and the apprentice!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TonyC
JetBlue
29
10-25-2006 06:57 PM
Freight Dog
Hiring News
13
09-21-2006 09:50 PM
HSLD
Flight Schools and Training
2
05-14-2006 09:07 AM
Bigflya
Fractional
3
04-19-2006 09:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices