![]() |
Originally Posted by Hawaii50
(Post 491812)
Met a NW guy in Hawaii several weeks back who told me DOJ approval would be 1 Nov plus or minus a few days with DCC immediately after. Hard for me to believe anybody making a life decision didn't have this info as well.
|
A number of years ago I flew a trip with a former PAA captain. He had a great quote: "Never underestimate the greed of a pilot".
If you think of that quote in terms of the guys who waited too long, trying to get that last paycheck before DCC, it'll make sense. |
Originally Posted by capncrunch
(Post 491790)
This is all your opinion and nothing more.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 491811)
Or good info to YOUR MEC, and bad info to OUR MEC, thereby saving MILLIONS in training costs. Once again, management knew what they were doing.
J Not donning tin foil hat or searching for black helicopters - yet |
Originally Posted by Jughead
(Post 491838)
Do you really believe what you write? Our respective management got together and orchestrated this entire thing, put out conflicting messages to the MEC's of each council, in cohoots with the DOJ, to avoid excessive training costs? I think you overestimate the abilities/luck of Delta management.
J Not donning tin foil hat or searching for black helicopters - yet |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 491811)
Or good info to YOUR MEC, and bad info to OUR MEC, thereby saving MILLIONS in training costs. Once again, management knew what they were doing.
|
I still think there was a grace period that would have allowed these guys to retire with the NWA insurance after the DCC. I thought it was a 48 hour grace period if they had filled out the paperwork and submitted it. Then when the DCC came, they had 48 hours to call and "pull the trigger" on their retirement. I don't know if that is really the case, but that was the info I got. So, if any of the NWA guys were really even remotely thinking about it, they would have had that paperwork in. The quick timing from DOJ to DCC would not have mattered.
In any case, we're all one big happy family now and lets hope that guys decide to leave way before age 65. |
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 491803)
I never said it was anything other than my opinion. I wish just as much as the next guy that 1000 NWA guys would retire next week, but if you are living in reality you know it is never going to happen. Also, in my opinion and nothing more, I don't think we will see the majority of them retire at 60 or 62.4.
Rocky, The "Thousands will retire" was proven false and is now a fact. Just as 62.4 will prove false but the genius of it is that it cannot be proven or disproven until after the fact. I'm just glad the myth of thousands retiring was proven false before the three wise men decide or better yet before they force our two sides to reach a deal. Scoop |
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 485062)
CAPN,
First of all its Scoop. Second of all reread my post - I never commented on NWA furloughing or not furloughing. In fact, I doubt they will furlough. I commented on the fact that a no-furlough clause with any kind of economic or F-M clause in it is worthless and I stand by that comment. As to 1000 guys retiring I am all for it. A merger of equals - how can that be? After all you guys have all the super duper fabulous premium special flying. I said it before and I will say it again - you guys are truly the adjective Kings! Scoop |
Spoken with great certainty, even though it is pure speculation.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:52 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands