Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

NWA Furloughs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2008 | 07:10 PM
  #61  
Superpilot92's Avatar
Underboob King
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Commander
Default

This isnt rocket science guys. After the SLI is completed its going to be done. From that point on anyone hired will be put on the seniority list just as they will be after SOC. In between DCC and SOC they may have a system seniority though depending on which base and ticket they get flown on. Just like now you may be more senior in one base than another.

Either way it doesnt really matter once the SLI is completed as far as we are concerned.
Reply
Old 10-25-2008 | 07:12 PM
  #62  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Carl we would not be merging these two class from separate airlines. They would be hired at Delta Air Lines, Inc., and given their seniority as the JPWA dictates. This is a huge point, and one that you fail to address.
Reply
Old 10-25-2008 | 07:28 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: Delta Colors Busholio
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
Carl,
I think it would depend on how the arbitrators rule and how the hiring is done. If all the hiring is done in ATL and they go to brainwashing, I mean INDOC, in ATL they will be given a DAL seniority number and then can be sent to MSP for training. Everyone would start training in ATL for general corporate type stuff and they would be sent to MSP for flight training. This would however preclude different classes one day apart. But on the other hand the arbitartors may have different ideas. Only time will tell.

Scoop
I agree with you. The only issue is that indoc is really about the FOM and operating under the certificate. So really, the newhire would do indoc in MSP for assignment to a former NWA airframe. FOMs go with the operating certificate, they are FAA approved. Maybe NWA will modify it's operations fast enough that the only difference between the two would be the actual aicraft training and procedures.
Reply
Old 10-25-2008 | 07:40 PM
  #64  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,264
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by Rotorhead
I agree with you. The only issue is that indoc is really about the FOM and operating under the certificate. So really, the newhire would do indoc in MSP for assignment to a former NWA airframe. FOMs go with the operating certificate, they are FAA approved. Maybe NWA will modify it's operations fast enough that the only difference between the two would be the actual aicraft training and procedures.
I agree with the FOM part, but DAL brings spouses to ATL for all the corporate stuff, medical, travel benefits, Peachtree Ball (only kidding) but you get the idea. Then the flight specific stuff starts, I think the admin type stuff takes 2-3 days . Oh did I mention the brainwashing part.

Scoop
Reply
Old 10-25-2008 | 08:10 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
You're right...I don't encourage it. But I do encourage as many retirements as possible before DCC. And after for that matter.

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
For those talking about NWA management not "letting" 1000 guys retire, you should know it's not management's decision to make. If 1000 NWA guys want to retire early, there's nothing that can be done.

What did you do to discourage the senior Delta pilots from all taking lump sums and bankrupting the pension for all Delta pilots?

Carl
Which is it, Carl? Is retirement a right protected by contract and ERISA or a convenience for the company.

btw, you answered a question with a question. The Delta retirements are historical fact. The underfunding of the NWA pension plans are current fact. Are you going to protect against sick leave abuse, theft, and retirements that aren't built into the actuarial funding model of your plan?

Or are you hot air and an example of what you suspect a "high number" of NWA pilots will do?

Those early retirements that you wish for only make your already underfunded plan more underfunded....
Reply
Old 10-25-2008 | 08:28 PM
  #66  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Which is it, Carl? Is retirement a right protected by contract and ERISA or a convenience for the company.
Which is it? What have I ever said that would lead you to believe I think retirement is a convenience for the company???

Originally Posted by slowplay
btw, you answered a question with a question. The Delta retirements are historical fact.
The question was: What did you do to stop that historical fact? It was rhetorical because I know a line pilot has little to do with stopping anything. Some DAL pilots haven't learned that yet.

Originally Posted by slowplay
The underfunding of the NWA pension plans are current fact. Are you going to protect against sick leave abuse, theft, and retirements that aren't built into the actuarial funding model of your plan?
See the above response.

Originally Posted by slowplay
Or are you hot air and an example of what you suspect a "high number" of NWA pilots will do?

Those early retirements that you wish for only make your already underfunded plan more underfunded....
Actually, you're wrong about that as well. Early retirement has no effect on the plan's funding. You take a 3% penalty for every year you retire prior to age 60.

Carl
Reply
Old 10-25-2008 | 09:15 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Some DAL pilots haven't learned that yet.
Ahh, nice! You sound just like Eric Newman in the SLI hearings. And you guys call Delta pilots arrogant....


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Actually, you're wrong about that as well. Early retirement has no effect on the plan's funding. You take a 3% penalty for every year you retire prior to age 60.
Ours had the same provision. Better take another math class, Carl. That may have been true with the old pension funding rules, you know the ones that mandated realistic interest rates for funding (our plan was less than 6%). But with the stretched out funding provisions of 8.85%, it isn't close to a wash.

You still never answered the question (you've been successful in diverting the first half to pensions). What are you (and all NWA pilots) going to do to help ensure a high number of NWA pilots don't steal from all of us?

Golly, shucks, there's nothing "Carl" can do about it.....but the Delta guys haven't learned that yet....
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 06:19 AM
  #68  
New Hire
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

Slowpay ,

The NWA DB pension plan is frozen along with all the benefits due all participants . Nobody can increase their benefit by retiring early . Not only will they take a hit of 3% per year for going early , they will lose the lumpsum payment ( the "excess" plan ) . With the normal retirement age going up to 65 I'm not sure what the trigger date for the excess plan payment is now . When I retired it was age 60 and if you retired one day early you did not get it . Now as to pilots using the contract to their benefit . It has always been this way and it always will be . A pilot would be foolish not to do anything the contract allows to improve his retirement . Don't you agree ? If NWA pilots retire early it will have no effect on the current retirement plan funding . I know it is shocking that pilots will try to sharp shoot the contract but what else have you got to think about on a 12 hour trans-pac !!
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 07:30 AM
  #69  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
You still never answered the question (you've been successful in diverting the first half to pensions). What are you (and all NWA pilots) going to do to help ensure a high number of NWA pilots don't steal from all of us?
This is the problem dealing with folks like you Slowplay. You're more interested in humping someone's leg than actually reading what they write. So I'll try one last time. Ready?

No single NWA pilot can stop anybody from doing anything that our contract allows. For that matter, the entire NWA pilot group can't stop anybody from doing anything that our contract allows. No more than you or any other Delta pilot could stop another Delta pilot from rightfully taking their lump sum - even though it meant bankrupting the pension plan for all the other Delta pilots.

With regard to our pension plan (of which you know nothing), read the above post.

I can't answer it any more clearly than that. Now please go hump someone else's leg.

I'm done with you on this.

Carl
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 12:28 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
This is the problem dealing with folks like you Slowplay. You're more interested in humping someone's leg than actually reading what they write. So I'll try one last time. Ready?

No single NWA pilot can stop anybody from doing anything that our contract allows. For that matter, the entire NWA pilot group can't stop anybody from doing anything that our contract allows. No more than you or any other Delta pilot could stop another Delta pilot from rightfully taking their lump sum - even though it meant bankrupting the pension plan for all the other Delta pilots.
You're quite the victim, aren't you? I think there's a world of difference between someone taking legally earned and protected retirement and someone (a high number, of which you're not encouraging this behavior) calling in sick when they're not to steal equity from NWA pilots and profit from all new Delta pilots.

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
With regard to our pension plan (of which you know nothing), read the above post.

Carl
Maybe you should stick with groundskeeping, Carl. You see, I actually read the stuff your MEC put out. Just by reading a few ziplines I found out that you don't know nearly as much as you think you do. Remember that you were wrong about the interest rate on the funding required of your pension? You're also wrong about accruing service with a hard frozen plan. Yet you continue to act as an authority on something you apparently know little about.

You're writing is the type of passive aggressive stuff that is legend from your MEC and your forum. Your direct arbitration case even started with a Redbook-Greenbook slam of Greg Averill by Eric Newman. I think the majority of your pilots will really enjoy the cultural change provided by our southern Koolaide. A small minority of our guys will really get into the conspiracy theories, backbiting, and disingenuous behaviors that a very small number of your guys seem to enjoy (ALPA Watch, votes of confidence, etc.), but I think the rest are ready for change. Of course, that cultural change might induce a little accountability into some of your "volunteers" that might make them uncomfortable...

It must be hard for a couple of your guys to read the transcripts of what actually occured in January through June this year.

I'm looking forward to what NWA brings to the new Delta. I just hope that those that aren't going to be new Delta aren't allowed to steal from us along the way.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ERJ Jay
Major
3
10-22-2008 06:57 AM
MJB68
Major
6
10-19-2008 12:30 PM
Scoop
Mergers and Acquisitions
176
10-10-2008 07:03 PM
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
234
10-03-2008 07:10 PM
ugleeual
Major
33
08-28-2008 03:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices