Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Sully's 60 Minutes Interview >

Sully's 60 Minutes Interview


Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Sully's 60 Minutes Interview

Old 06-12-2021 | 12:05 PM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 2,246
Likes: 102
Default

He is a safety consultant or whatever. He is milking free publicity for all it’s worth.
Reply
Old 06-12-2021 | 12:13 PM
  #112  
New Hire
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB
He is a safety consultant or whatever. He is milking free publicity for all it’s worth.
Hardly, LOL. Just thought it was an interesting thread after seeing a reference to it on a youtube post of a recent Sully interview (as I explained).
Reply
Old 06-12-2021 | 05:48 PM
  #113  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 965
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by KevinWoods
EXACTLY! The guys here with the straw man arguments...stating the obvious, that the water landing was a great event and we should give the crew credit; or that any criticism of Sully for not giving his crew more credit comes from jealousy...are just that...straw man arguments. I've rarely heard anyone criticize Sully for the landing, so how about skipping that?

Anyhow, I've been reading through this thread after seeing a more recent interview with Sully which popped up on youtube where someone mentions this forum. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6Eb...-0k9ORRULKS5ov. As others have said, most Captains I know would never use the word "I" as much he Sully does in nearly every interview, and neither would I. Sure, he plays lip service on occasion to the contributions of his other crew members, but then goes right back to talking about himself. As someone pointed out, if Sully was such a great guy, he could simply refuse any interview without his co-pilot, which would be totally appropriate if he really felt his First Officer contributed. I wasn't impressed at all...he really seemed full of himself, and appears to only mention his copilot as a dutiful side note, then goes on to describe how well read he is, and even how he invented the term "Brace for impact". Yeah, he makes it sound like that was something he thought of, in the spur of the moment.

The attacks by some here on guys who are simply saying Sully should have given far more credit to his co-pilot are really a bit over the top. The cult-like worship of the guy is a little too much. Maybe the defense of Sully's self-centered behavior has to do with something else, like Sully's laughable endorsement of Biden last year? Just saying...
Holy thread revival Batman!
Reply
Old 06-12-2021 | 08:51 PM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,750
Likes: 99
From: 1900D CA
Default

I've seen him speak and be interviewed many times and I always thought he consistently made a point that they did it as a crew.

I completely disagree with the above statement that he didn't share the credit.
Reply
Old 06-13-2021 | 01:05 AM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by terks43
Holy thread revival Batman!
Holy lack of originality Batman!
Reply
Old 06-13-2021 | 05:21 AM
  #116  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 965
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by WildBlue025
Holy lack of originality Batman!
Just joining in on the tradition when somebody revives a decade old thread. Don’t hate the player, hate the APC game.

Note, just noticed somebody said it before I did. Totally didn’t see that at all. Whoops!
Reply
Old 06-13-2021 | 07:09 PM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Grumpyaviator
holy thread-revival-for-no-apparent-reason Batman!!!

He ain't wrong.
Reply
Old 06-13-2021 | 08:04 PM
  #118  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Default

I’ve been told sully went off script to what was taught for a dual engine failure or any emergency, which is running through the QRH. I guess he was messing around with attempting a bleed air start or whatever. A couple of items down the QRH list read “press TOGA” which supposedly would have given the crew enough power to actually climb.

Just to add, I’ve heard he was one of the most bid avoided Captain’s at his domicile, known for being disrespectful to fellow crew members while riding the jumpseat.

I don’t know if that’s all bs, who cares at this point, but I’m wondering if anyone has any insider knowledge to what I just referenced.

Thanks.

Last edited by KirillTheThrill; 06-13-2021 at 08:38 PM.
Reply
Old 06-14-2021 | 04:16 AM
  #119  
Airhoss's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Default

Originally Posted by KirillTheThrill
I’ve been told sully went off script to what was taught for a dual engine failure or any emergency, which is running through the QRH. I guess he was messing around with attempting a bleed air start or whatever. A couple of items down the QRH list read “press TOGA” which supposedly would have given the crew enough power to actually climb.

Just to add, I’ve heard he was one of the most bid avoided Captain’s at his domicile, known for being disrespectful to fellow crew members while riding the jumpseat.

I don’t know if that’s all bs, who cares at this point, but I’m wondering if anyone has any insider knowledge to what I just referenced.

Thanks.
There ain’t no “TOGA buttons” to “press” in an Airbus. And nowhere in the dual engine flame out QRH that I am reading right now is there any item that says THRUST LEVER TOGA DETENT. And the QRH does specifically say that APU bleed air starts are okay below FL 150 with airspeed equal to or greater than 135 KIAS. The optimum windmilling air start speed is 280 KIAS. There is a note that attempting to windmill start an engine at slower than 280 Kts if the failure occurred during high power settings (TOGA, MCT or Climb) may cause an engine core lock.

Both of the engines were catastrophically damaged, they weren’t coming back PERIOD.

It takes about 3 minutes to completely read the dual engine flameout QRH if you include all the notes. 3 minutes they didn’t have.

Wether or not He was a butthead to fly with they did everything right given the time constraints they were working under on that day.
Reply
Old 06-14-2021 | 04:36 AM
  #120  
Allegheny's Avatar
"Yinzer an'at"
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Sittin at the puter
Default

Sully did go off script. It's because he knew the aircraft very well. For the record I have flown with him on several occasions. Starting the APU is on the second page of the Engine Out portion of the QRH. That dual flameout provision was / is for high altitude flame out. Sully was old school Airforce and had a lot committed to memory, even if it wasn't required.

The important thing about starting the APU out of sequence was not necessarily getting an airstart. It was keeping the computers on line and staying in Normal Law.

If you have seen the Tom Hanks movie, it is accurate to a T because they used flight and cockpit voice recorder data. The simulator scenes were flown by US Airways check-airmen.

In one scene in the cabin, the lights went out. That was the generators dropping off line. The engines were windmilling enough to give erratic power and hydraulics. Starting the APU guaranteed good computers and Alpha protection. Erratic power and hydraulics could have led to an Alternate Law situation where you lose Alpha Floor protection. With the APU on it also guaranteed blue hydraulics at full power, which supports normal flight controls.

Alpha Floor protection enabled Sully to hold full aft stick prior to impact and it allowed the aircraft to settle into the water without stalling. There is not a great deal of technique required, just keep the wings level and the aircraft will land at the slowest possible speed with a nose up attitude.

The movie also stated that the engines were producing power. What they were looking at was the auto start function. When the engines registered a failure on ECAM, placing the start switch in air start turned on ignition and introduces start fuel. The engines would accelerate however due to the damage the egt limits were hit and the sequence would start over again. The engines were so badly damaged they wouldn't run without over-temping.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlightPhoenix
Allegiant
51
10-10-2014 03:51 PM
jetjockee
Fractional
62
05-12-2011 05:20 AM
USMCFDX
Cargo
27
01-28-2009 10:46 AM
HanlonAir1986
Military
16
01-05-2009 10:08 AM
Sandhawk
Fractional
4
08-05-2008 05:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices