![]() |
That is why the LEC's need to be recalled to have a recall work.
It it is what you want, learn what you have to do to make it happen. |
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 558600)
Carl,
The election was a month ago and there was only one candidate. If there was some subversion of the process, couldn't the MEC have found one other person to run? What about you? Sounds like you have some beef with Lee but that doesn't seem to be the case with the people that elected him. The same people that elected him are the same people that would recall him a month later, does that make any sense at all to you? You just sound like a guy with sour grapes about something. 1. He was quoted in numerous publications that he would not run for an additional term as MEC chair after the merger's DCC. He said if he were drafted, he would refuse to serve. 2. All the early indications are that his personal view of RJ's being good for Delta Airlines are what won the day. Even though the Chairman has no vote, his cult of personality won the day. THAT is a subversion of the democratic process created by ALPA. Even if I agreed with Lee's position (which I do not), you can't have a one man show. It is too risky. This is my beef with Lee. Any other questions? Carl |
Here is one for ya.
I have been getting a few indications that RJDC is seeing LOA 2006-10 as an infraction on its agreement with ALPA. RJDC's beef is that this LOA pertained to only its original signatory's. (NWA-DAL-CPA and Mesaba) Fact is that due to the fact that this LOA now applies to all DCI carrier is very important to all Delta pilots. As we are shrinking we need to realize that this now affords our pilots the ability through our CBA to have rights at other carriers. It was not unintentional. What we need to do is make sure that our MEC and CNC do not sign a MOA with the RJDC and company that it only includes these carriers. If they do that it is only a further erosion of our CBA rites. I urge all of you to contract our representation and tell them what the importance of this NWA LOA 2006-10 is to all of us. |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 558681)
My beef with Lee is as follows:
1. He was quoted in numerous publications that he would not run for an additional term as MEC chair after the merger's DCC. He said if he were drafted, he would refuse to serve.
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 558681)
2. All the early indications are that his personal view of RJ's being good for Delta Airlines are what won the day. Even though the Chairman has no vote, his cult of personality won the day. THAT is a subversion of the democratic process created by ALPA.
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 558681)
Even if I agreed with Lee's position (which I do not), you can't have a one man show. It is too risky.
|
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 558767)
Show me those quotes. Even if true, so what? If the MEC wanted to get another Chairman they could have voted for someone else.
The first quote I read was from Lee printed in the AJC. He was on a bird hunting trip with a buddy, and he said the buddy asked if he would run again. His response was what I stated previously. That's where I first read it. I saw it since in previous emails. But I'm sure you'll say the AJC was lying and or the emails were misquotes.
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 558767)
Show me those quotes. I hear a lot of second hand stuff about a guy who told a guy but nothing that ever has been written down. What you call a cult of personality, I call an election. It seems that people that lose an election always find a way to diminish the outcome by attacking those who voted differently than them. Do you really think all the MEC members are so brainwashed that they couldn't find someone else? Again, why didn't you run?
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 558767)
There is not a one man show. In fact, Lee is famous for finding people that disagree with him and bringing them into the MEC administration. Do you have any first hand experience with his work as MEC Chairman to back up your accusations or are you just shooting from the hip? It easy to make a public smear, it is more difficult to back it up with facts.
I've never met Lee, so I have no first hand experience of him. What I've written above is what I have to back up what I think. It explains how such a horrific judgement such as the scope cave-in could have happened. Especially since Lee is quoted as saying: "RJ's are good for Delta Airlines." By the way, I would run if people really wanted me to. But I'm an old fart, and this is not rocket science. All you need is a person committed to the vigorous pursuit of the MEC's majority opinion. The person should be articulate, a great public speaker, and IMO, younger than me. Carl |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 558723)
Here is one for ya.
I have been getting a few indications that RJDC is seeing LOA 2006-10 as an infraction on its agreement with ALPA. An ALPA National agenda. RJ drivers are the future. Moak wants Prater's job. 2 + 2 |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 558967)
Careful. You're dangerously close to the real reason for Moak's cave-in on scope as well.
An ALPA National agenda. RJ drivers are the future. Moak wants Prater's job. 2 + 2 Carl |
I know and I know what is going on with this. I want it out there so people can e-mail their reps and make it well known that under no circumstances is scope or these LOA's for sale.
|
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 558967)
Careful. You're dangerously close to the real reason for Moak's cave-in on scope as well.
An ALPA National agenda. RJ drivers are the future. Moak wants Prater's job. 2 + 2 1)Moak is out. I vote YES. 2)ALPA is out. If we don't take action NOW, our jobs will continue to be outsourced. ALPA continues to support regionals, and it's a conflict of interest. ALPA cannot protect the career interests of mainline pilots & regional pilots. It clearly not working. |
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 558767)
There is not a one man show. In fact, Lee is famous for finding people that disagree with him and bringing them into the MEC administration. Do you have any first hand experience with his work as MEC Chairman to back up your accusations or are you just shooting from the hip? It easy to make a public smear, it is more difficult to back it up with facts. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:21 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands