Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   Delta MEC suggestion for the Junior Folks (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/36900-delta-mec-suggestion-junior-folks.html)

bigdaddie 02-14-2009 04:55 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 558571)
Junior half: ACL is exactly right here. I would slap down any such effort to attempt a takeover based on half the seniority list.

The problem at DALPA right now is that the democratic foundation of our union is being perverted by a dictator. If the system was working, all parts of the list would be represented. That's why we have FO reps, Capt reps and reps from all bases. This by definition makes the representation disparate across the pilot group. But here's the problem: none of that matters if everything is run by the personality cult of one man.

The LEC needs to recall the current chairman and replace him with a person committed to aggressively stating and pursuing the majority view of the MEC. That single step will produce a better union that is closer to the hearts and minds of the pilot group.

Carl


First off I will admit I've been drinking. I can't believe I'm going to say this but Carl, I agree 100% with you and your perspective. Ok, fine, there, I said it.

sailingfun 02-14-2009 04:59 PM

Off course you know that in making that statement Moak did not negotiate the deal. That was done by the grievance committee appointed by the MEC. He is the approving authority for grievance settlements and approved it. This is how grievances have been handled since the first days of DALPA.

bigdaddie 02-14-2009 05:13 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 559440)
Off course you know that in making that statement Moak did not negotiate the deal. That was done by the grievance committee appointed by the MEC. He is the approving authority for grievance settlements and approved it. This is how grievances have been handled since the first days of DALPA.

Ah, I wasn't really referring to the grievance, just Carl's statements as a whole. As long as we continue to pass minimal contract improvements for ridiculous terms, I will have to maintain my position at Taco Bell. For the record, after this displacement, my pay will be $6/hr less than I was making in 1999 as a 727 FO not even adjusting for inflation. Well at least I get to pay for health insurance, and boy that retirement is great! As long as DALPA keeps bending over so they can shove that widget up our asses, we will continue to be compensated likewise. Maybe Moak could at least have them shove it point first next time.

johnso29 02-14-2009 05:19 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 559431)
And today's treasure is tomorrows trash. His numbers and fleet plans are dead on. I see these 76 seat jets filling this gap nicely. :(

I know. I have no doubts about those numbers.:( I was just arguing that old NWA planned on flying them longer. But, as I said earlier it's a moot point. I also agree with sailingfun that management has ZERO intention of finding a Mainline 100 seat airplane. It's most likely our pilot group will shrink come 2013 when the retirements start(if not sooner due to furlough) because the DC9s will go to the boneyard and our flying will be further hoared out.:(

Carl Spackler 02-14-2009 05:34 PM


Originally Posted by bigdaddie (Post 559435)
First off I will admit I've been drinking. I can't believe I'm going to say this but Carl, I agree 100% with you and your perspective. Ok, fine, there, I said it.

There's a first time for everything. :D

When you sober up tomorrow, I'll go back to looking stupid.

Carl

Carl Spackler 02-14-2009 05:37 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 559440)
Off course you know that in making that statement Moak did not negotiate the deal. That was done by the grievance committee appointed by the MEC. He is the approving authority for grievance settlements and approved it. This is how grievances have been handled since the first days of DALPA.

I think you're off course with that statement. :D

The problem with DALPA as I see it, is that there are other committees - but they all seem to defer to the judgement of the MEC Chairman. That's a problem. We had a similar situation with NWALPA years ago. It ended very badly.

Carl

bigdaddie 02-14-2009 05:54 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 559457)
I think you're off course with that statement. :D

The problem with DALPA as I see it, is that there are other committees - but they all seem to defer to the judgement of the MEC Chairman. That's a problem. We had a similar situation with NWALPA years ago. It ended very badly.

Carl

You do realize that this makes the company very, very, happy.
BD

HercDriver130 02-15-2009 04:20 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 559449)
I know. I have no doubts about those numbers.:( I was just arguing that old NWA planned on flying them longer. But, as I said earlier it's a moot point. I also agree with sailingfun that management has ZERO intention of finding a Mainline 100 seat airplane. It's most likely our pilot group will shrink come 2013 when the retirements start(if not sooner due to furlough) because the DC9s will go to the boneyard and our flying will be further hoared out.:(

Infortunatly I think you are right. I have been saying for several years now that the mainline US carriers ala DAL, UAL, CAL etc... DO NOT want to be in the short or medium haul domestic airline business. They want to fly international, and the cherry picked long haul domestic routes and they have been slowly cedding the domestic structure to smaller jet carriers like SKW, RAH, XJET, etc.... they have been laying this ground work for 20 years. The proof is in the pudding!! When as a S5 pilot I had a trips had overnights in MIA, DEN and YEG ...that is NOT REGIONAL flying. Much of the problem now is that the train has left the station so to speak and it will is going to be a real biatch trying to stop it... good luck.

Pineapple Guy 02-15-2009 09:28 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 559347)
Once again, so much of what you post is utter Bullsh!t.

So, Carl, which points are you referring to with that comment? Is it:


Originally Posted by alfaromeo
So why aren't we there? What we can all see from the arbitration transcripts is that the whole idea was Lee Moak's. Not Dave Stevens, who tried to take credit, not John Prater who tried to take credit, the entire idea was Lee's.

because that part is 100% true. Or perhaps it is this:


Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Get involved up front, get stock, get contract benefits, get the seniority list done early, get the MEC's merged early, get working together so the merger benefited pilots and not just shareholders and senior management.

but that part is 100% true too. Maybe you meant this:


Originally Posted by alfaromeo
this has NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE in the history of labor and mergers. Never. Any industry, any labor group. It is easy to forget how ground breaking this was because it is all old hat now, as if this were the standard path.

but that part is 100% true too. I'm getting confused now. Just what are you referring to when you state:


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
so much of what you post is utter Bullsh!t.

Oh, I know. Maybe this?


Originally Posted by alfaromeo
The idea was so new and different, that the hardest people to get on board were the Northwest MEC members. They were constantly threatening to scuttle the process.

but, sadly, that's true too. Remember all the allegations about LOA19 that proved completely unfounded?

OK. I give up, Carl. Just what part were you referring to? I'd really like to know.

PG

Carl Spackler 02-15-2009 12:06 PM

Thanks for recapping the utter bullsh!t Pineapple. Everything you were kind enough to post plus the other stuff that you didn't. Utter BS.

Carl


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:37 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands