Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Can we please REGULATE AVIATION once again ? >

Can we please REGULATE AVIATION once again ?

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Can we please REGULATE AVIATION once again ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-03-2009 | 01:30 AM
  #11  
olympic's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: 747
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy23
You really think the government taking over is a good thing? Im sorry you have been affected by this economic downturn, but its been proven time and time again the government runs nothing effieciently. No good would come out of reregulation. As for socialism....we are more or less a socialist country already. Those socialistic ideas are what caused this whole crisis to begin with.
You have no idea what socialism is, trust me. The USA will never become a Socialist country, all this talk about OBAMA being a socialist makes "US" living abroad laugh.
Reply
Old 03-03-2009 | 01:46 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Left
Default

Originally Posted by SkyHigh
Regulating the airlines might seem like it would be good for the pilots but the passengers and company like the way things are now. And, they are the only people that matter.

Why would the government change anything?

Skyhigh
Not so sure the passengers like it so much. Chances are they will be late, cancelled, overbooked, rebooked or miss their connections, not to mention stripsearched, wanded, xrayed and yelled at. Or did I mention "ignored" if they complain about the whole mess?

Some re-regulation would/should restore some reliability, stability and order in our airline system. Government run - NO, Regulated - YES.
Reply
Old 03-03-2009 | 01:51 AM
  #13  
satchip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 0
From: Flying the SEC
Default

Regulation would bring stability and order back to our profession. For the top 50%. The rest of us will be out of a job. Regulation means less competition which means fewer jobs. Research how many airline jobs there were in 1978 and how many there were in 2008.
Reply
Old 03-03-2009 | 02:29 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Default

Well who is willing to give up their job so that the Airline Industry can resize itself to a "Regulated Supply-And-Demand Industry" from a "Free Market Supply-And-Demand Industry"?

I for one am not, and if thinking that Re-Regulating our industry will help fix it by ensuring better job/industry-wide security there's one little caveat to that.

We will be trading MANY Unsecure Airline Jobs for a FEW Secure Airline Jobs.

More Regulation = Less Competition + Federal Government Intervention = Less Pilot Jobs = More Pilots Complaining on APC.
Reply
Old 03-03-2009 | 02:39 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Balder
Some re-regulation would/should restore some reliability, stability and order in our airline system. Government run - NO, Regulated - YES.
I don't think you could have Regulation without Government Intervention.

If there is one thing we have learned about our federal government during this economic crisis, it's that the system of Regulation is broke beyond repair.
I'm not talking about the Regulation itself, but rather the actual Enforcement and Adequate Oversight that should be occurring.

I can see what your getting at by "Some Regulation", but unfortunately once the lobbyists and third/fourth/fifth party interests start getting involved exploitation of the taxpayer's money is a few steps away.

I love this country, but I hate what this government has become.
Reply
Old 03-03-2009 | 03:35 AM
  #16  
HalinTexas's Avatar
Feeling blessed.
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 564
Likes: 6
From: Happily coasting in the left seat until it ends.
Default

Are you ready to give up your career for regulation and "stability?"

I might go for it if there's a national seniority list based on the original ATP issue date. Mine's 08/93. Yeah, right, that will never happen.

Regulation: Who's going to decide who survives? On what basis? Can you see the lawsuits coming trying to decide this?

What about fares? Is the government going to keep them low enough to keep people flying? What if that fare basis is below cost? Will Uncle Barry pay the company the difference?

Unions. Will strikes be legal? I doubt it. They aren't for controllers.

In a free, open and fair market, the government can never compete with private enterprise. This includes police, fire, education etc. We just collectively chose not to handle it that way in most cases for peace of mind.
Reply
Old 03-03-2009 | 03:56 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HalinTexas
Are you ready to give up your career for regulation and "stability?"

I might go for it if there's a national seniority list based on the original ATP issue date. Mine's 08/93. Yeah, right, that will never happen.

Regulation: Who's going to decide who survives? On what basis? Can you see the lawsuits coming trying to decide this?

What about fares? Is the government going to keep them low enough to keep people flying? What if that fare basis is below cost? Will Uncle Barry pay the company the difference?

Unions. Will strikes be legal? I doubt it. They aren't for controllers.

In a free, open and fair market, the government can never compete with private enterprise. This includes police, fire, education etc. We just collectively chose not to handle it that way in most cases for peace of mind.
Dead on post.

I'll tell you who will survive, it will be the airline that donates the most amount of money to the controlling political party that is elected into power at the time.
When we have governors auctioning off Senate Seats, what makes you think there won't be a price tag for controlling stake in this industry.

Instead of the airlines giving back pay concessions and work benifits, that money will be used to gain political support and favor. We have enough detriments in this industry without this.
Reply
Old 03-03-2009 | 03:56 AM
  #18  
Dirtdiver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: 767A
Default

Originally Posted by UIUCpilot85
The government runs nothing efficiently? You have to be kidding me. Why not privatize the police? Why not the fire department too? Isn't our military technically the government? Why not let the market decide what is an acceptable price for public protection. You're telling me NASA is an ad-hoc operation?

The idea that the market handles EVERYTHING better is ludicrous at best. Yes, generally, businesses are more efficient than the government. Yes, there are governmental institutions that are corrupt and inept. But, can you honestly watch CNN/FOX/MSNBC and truthfully believe that the economic models of countless banks, the big 3 automakers, and others have been operating on sound priniciples?

Now, I'm no governmental scholar, but I hardly think having rules constitutes socialism. I'm inclined to agree that regulation such as it was pre-1978 isn't good for the public or the industry. I do think, however, that a structured system of some sort operated under the principles of free enterprise with an abundance of competition is advantageous in comparison to the wild-west-last-man-standing mentality. Clearly, that has "been time and time again proven to run nothing efficiently"
Concur. The biggest gov operation of all: the military. None of the Free Market Makes Everything Perfect crowd ever mentions the 500 pound gorilla.
Reply
Old 03-03-2009 | 04:10 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by UIUCpilot85
The government runs nothing efficiently? You have to be kidding me. Why not privatize the police? Why not the fire department too? Isn't our military technically the government? Why not let the market decide what is an acceptable price for public protection. You're telling me NASA is an ad-hoc operation?

The idea that the market handles EVERYTHING better is ludicrous at best. Yes, generally, businesses are more efficient than the government. Yes, there are governmental institutions that are corrupt and inept. But, can you honestly watch CNN/FOX/MSNBC and truthfully believe that the economic models of countless banks, the big 3 automakers, and others have been operating on sound priniciples?

Now, I'm no governmental scholar, but I hardly think having rules constitutes socialism. I'm inclined to agree that regulation such as it was pre-1978 isn't good for the public or the industry. I do think, however, that a structured system of some sort operated under the principles of free enterprise with an abundance of competition is advantageous in comparison to the wild-west-last-man-standing mentality. Clearly, that has "been time and time again proven to run nothing efficiently"
Military, Fire Department, Police Departments, and Hospitals are more or less a social need. One of the primary goals of this Country is to keep it's borders secure and it's citizens safe. In times of emergencies, the help and support provided should be symmetrical in every corner of this country.

I don't agree with you, not on the basis of whether regulation is a good or bad thing, that is. I think there is an inherit need for regulation, in general, in this country, however the system NEEDS to work. My disagreement with you is not in terms of Regulation, as much as it is with Enforcement.

Point in case, the Financial Markets did not collapse as a result of too much, or too little regulation. The markets collapsed because out Federal Government was not doing their job and never ENFORCED the Regulating Mechanism that had been in place over the past 30-50 years.

Anyway you look at it, our federal governments is not fiscally responsible, I'm not going to get into whether it was the Democrats or Republicans because in the end it won't solve our problems as a nation. Our government has inflated the dollar to it's limit, we have an gigantic deficit, and corruption inundating all levels of our government. It's a sad day when the people of a nation can't trust their government, and I for one have lost my faith and trust in our current government.

Point is, better Enforcement of our Regulation before we can even consider Expanding More Regulation.
Reply
Old 03-03-2009 | 04:17 AM
  #20  
Pielut's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Ex Bottom Feeder
Default

Pilots as goverment employees? Bad Plan! The government destroys everything it touches. The taxpayers should not have to subsidize poorly run companies that can't figure out if you don't make money you should go out of business. Although those nice blue TSA smurf uniforms would be great, do we get shiny badges that mean nothing also?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DBFly9229
Military
11
06-20-2011 05:00 PM
FlyHigh423
Hangar Talk
6
02-10-2009 10:31 AM
skiermws
Flight Schools and Training
4
01-08-2009 09:03 AM
FlyHigh423
Major
15
12-31-2008 01:56 PM
aileronjam
Hiring News
17
11-11-2008 09:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices