Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Question for AA73 and 7576FO >

Question for AA73 and 7576FO

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Question for AA73 and 7576FO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2009, 04:05 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 390
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
AE ALPA can be the carrier to operate in the 70-100 seat range that AMR is trying to break into. Nobody wants to see the flying leave the AMR family, so IF it was absolutely necessary for APA to give up some room on scope they could include in the clause "all flying will be performed by wholly owned AMR carriers" or something of the sorts. AE ALPA can be this carrier to perform flying at competitive market rates. AE ALPA can offer employment to those on furlough on the APA list to fly the 100 seaters and in turn all future AA vacancies will be filled by AE pilots. (Yes, I know we had a letter 3 before and it was a disaster... we've learned our lessons and if done right it could be beneficial to all parties) There should be no need for AMR mgmt to outsource any future flying.
I'd vote to burn it down before I'd vote to work for pathetic AE compensation or give away more jobs to AE. If the company wants that, they can take it to bankrputcy and get it there. AA can hire exclusively from AE now. They don't and won't. It creates another training cycle and cost them money. Heck during the last hiring cycle they only hired a handful of flowthrus.

Again, an agreement like this benefits AE almost exclusively. Also the devil is in the details like flowback seniority. And I have no doubt that AE ALPA would not like the what the APA would demand in that respect.

Sorry, not practical, at least IMHO.

From the looks of Wall Street's reaction to the Obama give-away social engineering wealth distribution recovery plan, it's very possible that the economy is going to crash late this year along with lot of airlines, AMR included. I don't know what's going to come first, an economic crash, a strike, or AMR on the courthouse steps.
Wheels up is offline  
Old 03-07-2009, 05:31 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default

Originally Posted by Wheels up View Post
What differences are you speaking about? Please be specific.

Work together? How? Specifically? What practical, concrete, and actionable leverage does AE bring to the table . . .
Originally Posted by Wheels up
. . . the devil is in the details like flowback seniority. And I have no doubt that AE ALPA would not like the what the APA would demand in that respect.
There's a difference with APA that AE ALPA might have leverage on right there, no?

'We must all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately.' - Ben Franklin

kumbaya . . .
Sniper is offline  
Old 03-07-2009, 11:10 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 390
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper View Post
There's a difference with APA that AE ALPA might have leverage on right there, no?

'We must all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately.' - Ben Franklin

kumbaya . . .
The seniority issue is assuming that AA could be coerced/convinced to combine the companies. My point is that AE ALPA has zero practical leverage to influence AMR towards that end.

It all may become a moot point if the APA is forced into self-help sometime in the next year.
Wheels up is offline  
Old 03-07-2009, 11:32 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 490
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
AE ALPA can be the carrier to operate in the 70-100 seat range that AMR is trying to break into. Nobody wants to see the flying leave the AMR family
Says who? AMR? As soon as humanly possible they will put their "regional" needs up for bid. Just like the government. Lowest bid wins. Whoever the bottom feeder of the month is, with the aircraft mix that AMR wants, will win. They can dump some of the 20 year Eagle Captains ($$$$) and replace them with 20-something Riddle dudes. Eagle will probably not entirely go away, but just become a marginal player flying t-props around TX, FL, and the Caribbean.
chignutsak is offline  
Old 03-07-2009, 11:55 AM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Wheels up View Post
What differences are you speaking about? Please be specific.

Work together? How? Specifically? What practical, concrete, and actionable leverage does AE bring to the table besides "moral" support (as if AMR cares about employee morale)? Considering their long term contract + several years of negotiations, what can they do besides sit on the sidelines? Spare me the standard "kumbaya" please.

APA pilots don't have anything left to give. It's all been taken by the 2003 rape and cost of living since then. And AMR wants to kill off probably another 1000 mainline pilot jobs through productivity "improvements" and taking a meat cleaver to scope. The prevailing thought is that AMR's bottom line is pay stays as it is, but all benefits and productivity get dumbed-down once again.

Right now AE ALPA is toothless and AMR knows it. AE ALPA is in the box and AMR is not about to let them out of it, regardless of what the APA does.
You are correct.

All AE ALPA can do is sit on the sidelines and watch. AE ALPA isn't part of the negotiation equation and Eagle only exists as a source of cheaper labor. But that's the point. These aircraft will HAVE to flown by cheaper labor because the competition already does that.

Eagle will likely be the beneficiaries of some of that flying, but another carrier will reap as much or better and neither will have anything to do with it per se. Eagle flies hundreds of jets now and had NOTHING to do with that ! It will be the AA pilots (mostly junior) who are likely to take the biggest loss. Look at things so far.........THEY are the ones on furlough now and have paid the biggest price for the outsourcing of their flying.

Should the ultimate outcome resemble my views, then it seems you'll understand that Eagle pilots had nothing to do with it other then breathing air in the vacinity.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 03-07-2009, 12:02 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
AE ALPA can be the carrier to operate in the 70-100 seat range that AMR is trying to break into. Nobody wants to see the flying leave the AMR family, so IF it was absolutely necessary for APA to give up some room on scope they could include in the clause "all flying will be performed by wholly owned AMR carriers" or something of the sorts. AE ALPA can be this carrier to perform flying at competitive market rates. AE ALPA can offer employment to those on furlough on the APA list to fly the 100 seaters and in turn all future AA vacancies will be filled by AE pilots. (Yes, I know we had a letter 3 before and it was a disaster... we've learned our lessons and if done right it could be beneficial to all parties) There should be no need for AMR mgmt to outsource any future flying.
AMR will have nothing to do with any more intermixing of pilots of AA and feeders. It cost too much money and was a logistical pain in the arse.

If a "showdown" is going to happen (and it seems inevitable as I don't believe the APA is bluffing on their demands), then it's best for AMR to have ALL problems taken care of at once. They'll want to PERMANANTLY reshape the landscape and remove the chains that will rattle every 4 years for good.

Painful for a couple of years but the benefits would last decades. It's almost becoming a no brainer.

Be a good Eagle pilot, get your popcorn and watch the show. But enjoy that pocorn now, because WE will have our turn at watching outsourcing to the inevitable "other" feeder necessary to emasculate US in the future.

The only winner will be AMR.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 03-07-2009, 12:09 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Wheels up View Post
From the looks of Wall Street's reaction to the Obama give-away social engineering wealth distribution recovery plan, it's very possible that the economy is going to crash late this year along with lot of airlines, AMR included. I don't know what's going to come first, an economic crash, a strike, or AMR on the courthouse steps.
Congrats.............it appears you understand the concept of time and timing. The variables above are unknown in whether they will occur and if so, in what order.

That's the "time" part..........AMR needs more of that.

The timing part, is dependant on those variables and the APA and yes, the courthouse steps will likely be the ultimate destination. AMR can learn from the past failures and mistakes of other airlines in BK (a nice luxury) and can clean up all fleet and labor issues in one fell swoop. The worse the economy, the more sympathy for AMR and political (and judicial) rationalization to grant the majority of their future plan.

Last edited by eaglefly; 03-07-2009 at 12:22 PM.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 03-07-2009, 12:14 PM
  #18  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Wheels up View Post
The seniority issue is assuming that AA could be coerced/convinced to combine the companies. My point is that AE ALPA has zero practical leverage to influence AMR towards that end.

It all may become a moot point if the APA is forced into self-help sometime in the next year.
Again true.

AE ALPA isn't part of the equation and will only be doing what they've always done........accept what's given to them for the benefit of others (AMR).

APA self-help is the trigger.....................AMR won't go one single week operating under "chaaos". If they need more time for the right "timing", they can delay that (at least a little while).

That is the only certainty out there.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 03-07-2009, 12:18 PM
  #19  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by chignutsak View Post
Says who? AMR? As soon as humanly possible they will put their "regional" needs up for bid. Just like the government. Lowest bid wins. Whoever the bottom feeder of the month is, with the aircraft mix that AMR wants, will win. They can dump some of the 20 year Eagle Captains ($$$$) and replace them with 20-something Riddle dudes. Eagle will probably not entirely go away, but just become a marginal player flying t-props around TX, FL, and the Caribbean.
What is the "lowest bid" ?

Is it the surface bid, or do other variables enter the equation like AMR control for the ability to manipulte profit/loss and tax issue.

The lowest surface bid by Grace L. Ferguson Airline and Storm Door Company may cost AMR more then Eagle and another carrier either spun off, or with a more adventageous agreement.

Eagle apparently DID have several suitors during its time in the "For Sale" window, but the details AMR wanted involved too much control for AMR and too little profit for a stand alone company.

That should tell you something.

Eagle isn't going to disappear and since seniority is an issue even in BK, it will likely be those junior who pay. In BK, it may not matter that Eagle has senior captains as pay scales could be readjusted to match the competition...........likely across the board, but it would be those senior who would be the hardest hit.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 03-07-2009, 01:55 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 80
Default

This is all a lot of speculation but as of now the APA proposal on scope brings all flying back to AA. No more commuter exception period. That would force AA out of the small airplane business or operate them with AA pilots. Presumably these would be ex Eagle guys. I think APA is done farting around with scope. It's all or nothing as I see it. I know Lloyd Hill feels the same way.
I don't know whats going to happen but I think AA is underestimating the overall resolve of the pilot group this time.
AA gear puller is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices