New Delta capacity cuts
03-10-2009 | 08:56 AM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
From: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Agreed. But I would rather be here than anywhere else. We potentially will have $7b at the end of '09. Contrast that with say UAL who is under $3 b in cash on hand and that has few options. LCC is in worse shape. If these airlines fail only two things can happen, the gov't can try and use the "to big to fail" argument and a bailout, or they will let the marketplace decide.
03-10-2009 | 08:58 AM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
From: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Well, those same furloughs could be mitigated by not relaxing our Scope language and bringing those 76 seaters on to DAL property. There is a lot of chatter right now on RAH buying Compass. If that happened, would that negate the flow through?
03-10-2009 | 09:03 AM
#14
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
03-10-2009 | 09:09 AM
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 62
From: Legacy FO
Am I the only one who thinks you guys are being rather naive?
Unemployment is at 8% ... and is forecasted to go much higher. Who cares if DAL buys a new 777 here or there. They'll just park older aircraft.
Our no furlough clauses aren't going to hold if the economy does as forecasted.
Unemployment is at 8% ... and is forecasted to go much higher. Who cares if DAL buys a new 777 here or there. They'll just park older aircraft.
Our no furlough clauses aren't going to hold if the economy does as forecasted.
03-10-2009 | 09:10 AM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: SLC ERB
Did anyone else get the telephone survey from ALPA? They called me over the weekend - I made a big deal about how important scope protection was to me.
03-10-2009 | 09:13 AM
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 102
No, a Compass divestiture does not affect the flow. The only way the flow changes is if BOTH parties agree.
I don't think the flow, as it stands, would survive at RAH. Failure to maintain the flow would result in draconian 70 seat cuts, which I don't think mama DAL would be willing to deal with right now.
It's interesting to note, though, that DALs most serious competitors, AMR, CAL, and SWA have little or no 70 seat feed, and I've heard serious talk that the whole 70 seat program is being re-considered along the same lines as the 50 seat program. The are BIG DCI cuts coming, and I've heard that this time next year there will be at least one less wholly owned.
Nu
03-10-2009 | 09:19 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: MD-80 FO
Am I the only one who thinks you guys are being rather naive?
Unemployment is at 8% ... and is forecasted to go much higher. Who cares if DAL buys a new 777 here or there. They'll just park older aircraft.
Our no furlough clauses aren't going to hold if the economy does as forecasted.
Unemployment is at 8% ... and is forecasted to go much higher. Who cares if DAL buys a new 777 here or there. They'll just park older aircraft.
Our no furlough clauses aren't going to hold if the economy does as forecasted.
03-10-2009 | 09:21 AM
#20
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
YES. But I guess it hurts less if you hope for the best & expect the worst.
Just like the old DC9s that have come out of the desert?
Just like the old DC9s that have come out of the desert?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
