Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

USAPA Guilty of DFR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2009, 11:08 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 698
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
You mean the furloughed guys that had been gone for six years from an airline on bk #2? You know the late eighties early nineties hires that had between 5 to 6 years of total service those guys should be senior to a senior line holding 757 fo?
Oh and you are so bright that you think the east getting 517 guys on top of the list was a bad deal for them? So mediation and arbitration said they are wrong, 3 alpa committees said they are wrong and now 9 jurors unanimously decided they are wrong in less than 60 minutes of deliberation, what are the odds that maybe the east is wrong in your opinion?
Don't put words in my mouth. I never said that the 517 East guys got screwed. I said they got a good deal, but must have saw their junior pilots got screwed. Usually in this industry the senior pilots will screw the junior ones. This is where I start to wonder if the award was fair. Those senior East pilots have nothing to lose here. So I keep asking why they think the award was bad.

So you're telling me that a pilot hired in the late 80's early 90's should be put behind a pilot hired in the 2000's?
Sounds like a screw job to me. Any other trade puts time of service above others. Electricians, etc, so why would a 1989 new hire be put behind a 2001 hire? I have no friends on either side of this, so take this as an outside look. I have nothing to gain from any outcome.
tpersuit is offline  
Old 05-13-2009, 11:19 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 243
Default

Originally Posted by all4114all View Post
The trial will be ongoing, next stop the Federal District Court of Appeals in August of this year. Separate operations will continue until the pilots ok a joint contract. There is no time limit.

Your understanding of the appeal process is lacking.
Cactusone is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 04:12 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Free Bird's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 799
Default

Originally Posted by tpersuit View Post
So you're telling me that a pilot hired in the late 80's early 90's should be put behind a pilot hired in the 2000's?
Sounds like a screw job to me. Any other trade puts time of service above others. Electricians, etc, so why would a 1989 new hire be put behind a 2001 hire? I have no friends on either side of this, so take this as an outside look. I have nothing to gain from any outcome.
What you're advocating is not consistent with ALPA's guidelines for a merger. Both US and AMWest were ALPA. They Both agreed to binding arbitration. The system isn't perfect, but it's what all agreed to.
Free Bird is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 04:27 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by tpersuit View Post
So you're telling me that a pilot hired in the late 80's early 90's should be put behind a pilot hired in the 2000's?
Sounds like a screw job to me. Any other trade puts time of service above others. Electricians, etc, so why would a 1989 new hire be put behind a 2001 hire? I have no friends on either side of this, so take this as an outside look. I have nothing to gain from any outcome.
Welcome to the world of individual airline seniority systems. It's far from perfect, but its what we all signed up for. And until we can mutually agree on a better way, that's how it is done. Your longevity (time of service) is irrelevant when seniority systems are merged, as has been proven countless times in countless mergers.

Binding arbitration. Both sides agreed to it. Every independent review has deemed the result fair.

PG
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 04:35 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Originally Posted by tpersuit View Post
Don't put words in my mouth. I never said that the 517 East guys got screwed. I said they got a good deal, but must have saw their junior pilots got screwed. Usually in this industry the senior pilots will screw the junior ones. This is where I start to wonder if the award was fair. Those senior East pilots have nothing to lose here. So I keep asking why they think the award was bad.

So you're telling me that a pilot hired in the late 80's early 90's should be put behind a pilot hired in the 2000's?
Sounds like a screw job to me. Any other trade puts time of service above others. Electricians, etc, so why would a 1989 new hire be put behind a 2001 hire? I have no friends on either side of this, so take this as an outside look. I have nothing to gain from any outcome.
There is one primary reason why date of hire works for most other professions: that is how they get paid. If you are on a longevity pay scale then date of hire works for seniority.

That is not how pilots get paid. If you look at the East's own pay scale you will see my point. An Embraer 190 first officer tops out at $52 per hour. An Airbus 330 captain makes $160 per hour, a difference of $108 per hour. A 2 year A-330 captain makes $146 per hour, a difference of $16.

So the East pilots recognize that status and category equates to a change of $108 per hour and longevity equates to $16 per hour. THAT IS THEIR OWN PAY SCALE. Status and category makes much more sense as an integration methodology rather than date of hire. USAPA even recognizes the problem with date of hire and they had to try to come up with a bunch of conditions and restrictions to try to pound this square seniority list into a round hole. As Northwest found in the merger with Republic, these conditions and restrictions never properly anticipate the future leading to repeated internal arbitrations which created a toxic atmosphere.

If pilots went to a pure longevity based pay scale, then date of hire would work. That is not how pilots get paid. Remember, when US Airways bought the Trump Shuttle, the US Airways pilots argued for a status and category integration for this very reason. Their conversion to date of hire occurred about the same time they became the oldest legacy carrier pilot group. Hardly a profile in courage.
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 08:39 AM
  #26  
Cactus Aviator
 
JetMonkey's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Learning to fly with my left hand.
Posts: 250
Default

Originally Posted by tpersuit View Post
So you're telling me that a pilot hired in the late 80's early 90's should be put behind a pilot hired in the 2000's?
Sounds like a screw job to me. Any other trade puts time of service above others. Electricians, etc, so why would a 1989 new hire be put behind a 2001 hire? I have no friends on either side of this, so take this as an outside look. I have nothing to gain from any outcome.
You're looking those pilot's DOH vs. where they each fell on their respective seniority lists. Those late 80's and early 90's guys were on the bottom of THEIR list. Same thing at AWA with pilots hired in the 2000's. Therefore, they each should be placed at the same relative position on the NEW list. Nobody gains anything, nobody loses anything. That's what's fair and Nicalou knew that, so that's what he did.
JetMonkey is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 11:48 AM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

I think the only way Parker can save this airline is to admit it was a mistake to save US Air, which was sure to flop dead and find a way to seperate the carriers and cut U loose.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 12:25 PM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Boeing 737 First Officer
Posts: 51
Default USAPA Biyatch Slapped in Court

Hey Sully......

Next time your daughter asks you what the meaning of "integrity" is, just point over to the America West Pilots group and say "that's it right there!".

They have shown nothing but integrity, class and professionalism despite being completely abandoned by a "union" formed by persons of NO integrity who would not stand by their legal agreement of binding arbitration. Total scum!

Congratulations to the West Pilots Group! You truly persevered over a rotten and ruthless bunch of thugs!

To the East Coast guys....you boys booted ALPA out because you didnt like the list & would not honor (note: the word "honor" is probably unfamiliar to the Easties!) your agreement to live with the Nicolau award. Now...without your one and only issue, you are stuck with a joke of a "union" with no leadership, no clout, a potentially huge award for actual and punative damages pending & nearly half (that was before the loss of the lawsuit...probably 80% now) of your "membership" who disavows even belonging. Wonder how long it will take for another vote to go back to ALPA.

Again...congrats to the West Pilots. This is a great day for your group and for our entire profession. YOU HAVE INTEGRITY!

Last edited by mesasurvivor; 05-14-2009 at 12:58 PM.
mesasurvivor is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 02:26 PM
  #29  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by mesasurvivor View Post
Hey Sully......

Next time your daughter asks you what the meaning of "integrity" is, just point over to the America West Pilots group and say "that's it right there!".

They have shown nothing but integrity, class and professionalism despite being completely abandoned by a "union" formed by persons of NO integrity who would not stand by their legal agreement of binding arbitration. Total scum!

Congratulations to the West Pilots Group! You truly persevered over a rotten and ruthless bunch of thugs!

To the East Coast guys....you boys booted ALPA out because you didnt like the list & would not honor (note: the word "honor" is probably unfamiliar to the Easties!) your agreement to live with the Nicolau award. Now...without your one and only issue, you are stuck with a joke of a "union" with no leadership, no clout, a potentially huge award for actual and punative damages pending & nearly half (that was before the loss of the lawsuit...probably 80% now) of your "membership" who disavows even belonging. Wonder how long it will take for another vote to go back to ALPA.

Again...congrats to the West Pilots. This is a great day for your group and for our entire profession. YOU HAVE INTEGRITY!
My bet says USAPA declares bankruptcy and liquidates before they have to further ram their membership in the buttocks for more cash to continue this mockery.............or pay for its current embarrassing faliure.

Supreme Court ?

GMAFB..........like they'd waste their time with this crap. They'll kick it back to Judge Judy where it belongs.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 02:29 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 259
Default

Originally Posted by mesasurvivor View Post
Hey Sully......

Next time your daughter asks you what the meaning of "integrity" is, just point over to the America West Pilots group and say "that's it right there!".

They have shown nothing but integrity, class and professionalism despite being completely abandoned by a "union" formed by persons of NO integrity who would not stand by their legal agreement of binding arbitration. Total scum!

Congratulations to the West Pilots Group! You truly persevered over a rotten and ruthless bunch of thugs!

To the East Coast guys....you boys booted ALPA out because you didnt like the list & would not honor (note: the word "honor" is probably unfamiliar to the Easties!) your agreement to live with the Nicolau award. Now...without your one and only issue, you are stuck with a joke of a "union" with no leadership, no clout, a potentially huge award for actual and punative damages pending & nearly half (that was before the loss of the lawsuit...probably 80% now) of your "membership" who disavows even belonging. Wonder how long it will take for another vote to go back to ALPA.

Again...congrats to the West Pilots. This is a great day for your group and for our entire profession. YOU HAVE INTEGRITY!
Well not quite a complete assessment of the West.

The Rico part of the suit below was not allowed, but the Judge said that a criminal case can be filed, it is presently on hold.

http://www.planebusiness.com/buzz/awausapa.pdf
all4114all is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joel payne
Hangar Talk
1
02-02-2009 01:26 PM
Jake Wheeler
Union Talk
5
01-16-2009 01:55 PM
cactiboss
Major
86
12-20-2008 11:56 AM
ERJ Jay
Hangar Talk
13
10-28-2008 08:11 AM
cactiboss
Major
87
10-03-2008 02:24 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices