Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
100 Seat Jets now flown by Regional Carrier!! >

100 Seat Jets now flown by Regional Carrier!!

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

100 Seat Jets now flown by Regional Carrier!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2009, 08:26 AM
  #201  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: G550 Captain
Posts: 1,206
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Excellent point.

After all the promised flow throughs, how many slots remain? Have all the flow through mechanism's made the doorway very crowded for the military candidates?
That depends on how many, if any, DAL plans to hire in the future. There are only two regionals under the DAL system with a flowthru agreement as you know, XJ and CZ. 9 per month for XJ making it up to 108 per year, and 20 per month for CZ but no more than 25% of the total number of pilots at CZ which I believe is 25% of approx 330, making it 82.
Lighteningspeed is offline  
Old 05-26-2009, 09:32 AM
  #202  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by RichieAshburn View Post
Ok, you win...even though all 3 paragraphs were ASSUMPTIONS on how the regionals will thrive, thus you're playing the odds. GOT IT??? You seem to think you've predicted the future, maybe you should play the lottery. Ever since the first RJ at Comair, it did not take a genius to figure out regionals would grow. After 9/11, it did not take a genius to figure out regionals would grow more. Why you think you've beat the odds is beyond me, anyone could see the obvious shift in flying. There is now a slow shift in the majors favor, we'll see if it continues.

You want to talk 100 seaters at Republic, okay. You're starting to see the junior DAL pilots make some waves on this issue. It will gain speed, as it directly DOES affect us since we own 47% of MEH. They will be flying routes that DAL could(and should) be flying. Our ALPA reps are already being bombarded with calls and emails. They are taking notice and know it is an important issue. I don't know what will happen, but I can say for sure that the junior DAL pilots will fight hard to protect our flying and re-claim what was given away by others in the past.

Please remember, if you respond: IT"S NOT ABOUT YOU!!!


The Midwest pilots wanted to talk to DALPA. Answer: Get lost.

The Midwest pilots warned DALPA about a 100 seat plan. Answer: Get lost.

You made your bed... you need to sleep in it. DALPA has been playing with scope language too long. See you at a regional. Good Luck.
MD80 is offline  
Old 05-26-2009, 01:54 PM
  #203  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Excellent point.

After all the promised flow throughs, how many slots remain? Have all the flow through mechanism's made the doorway very crowded for the military candidates?

What I find funny Bar is that no one seems to want to respond to what a DCI wide Bi-lateral does.

No one wants to argue that one. Why? Because besides giving up more flying to DCI it is the biggest costs savings too that management can use. It will be packaged as a gain for our group, but in effect, is a concession. (Think Wolf in Sheep's clothing)
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 05-26-2009, 06:01 PM
  #204  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Excellent point.

After all the promised flow throughs, how many slots remain? Have all the flow through mechanism's made the doorway very crowded for the military candidates?

I understand the military guys want to bypass the regionals, but that time maybe coming to a end.
MD80 is offline  
Old 05-26-2009, 06:02 PM
  #205  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Can we, the sheep, have a slight review of the bi-lateral flow idea? I get the downside, but where does it stand and who is pushing it?

forgot to bid is offline  
Old 05-26-2009, 06:07 PM
  #206  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by MD80 View Post
I understand the military guys want to bypass the regionals, but that time maybe coming to a end.
Someone said this to me and I kind of have to agree, in the next hiring boom there will probably be an increase in the % of military guys hired because they'll probably be 20 year retired military pilots in their early 40s who'd only be accruing seniority at the majors (Delta in this case) for 20-25 years at the most vs the late 20s and early 30 year old crowd they hired that'll be here for 30-35 years.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 05-26-2009, 07:35 PM
  #207  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rhino Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 73N CA
Posts: 474
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
Someone said this to me and I kind of have to agree, in the next hiring boom there will probably be an increase in the % of military guys hired because they'll probably be 20 year retired military pilots in their early 40s who'd only be accruing seniority at the majors (Delta in this case) for 20-25 years at the most vs the late 20s and early 30 year old crowd they hired that'll be here for 30-35 years.
No, they'll be hired because of their qualifications and experience. Has nothing to do with their "projected longevity" with DAL, or any other major for that matter. Where the hell do you come up with this $h**?

The past few years were tough for this industry (and others of course)...hence why a majority of guys decided to stay in and protect themselves and their families. You will see a shift in the near future. I know plenty of guys on the fence waiting for things to turn around before they jump.

When they jump, the percentage of those prior military hired will jump accordingly. Always has, always will.
Rhino Driver is offline  
Old 05-26-2009, 07:35 PM
  #208  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,993
Default

Rhino - Sir, read your contract. There simply are not going to be as many unspoken for Delta slots for the most qualified to compete for.
Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
Can we, the sheep, have a slight review of the bi-lateral flow idea? I get the downside, but where does it stand and who is pushing it?
Our (yours and mine - no matter which part of Delta you work in) Our MEC Chairmen are pushing it as a lower cost scope substitute. They are talking it up and held a meeting last month to talk it up some more as THE strategic direction our union is taking scope in.

In exchange for giving me a job flying an RJ (which I walked away from top 30% and longevity to come to Delta) our Regionals are offered a someday promise (which might not ever come true in this business) of employment if they give up their longevity to walk across a mostly imaginary line.

This is supposed to replace mainline scope, narrow body fleet replacement / growth and job security and we are supposed to like it. Better yet, it is hoped we never have to use it, because by the look of things it will not work if needed anyway.

This strategic scope plan is a horribly flawed idea. It is so flawed that I do not expect it to really go anywhere, but, it provides political eyewash that many will accept if they don't bother to think about how this would work when called on to function during duress.

It is basically the same system US Air has been trying to implement. If you are curious about how it works, just look over there and follow the plight of US Air pilots at MidAtlantic.

Arguably it has prevented furloughs at Delta because it is unworkable. So there is a "silver lining" to that. Bottom line, flow through agreements are no substitute for having the airplanes flown at mainline by mainline pilots.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 05-26-2009 at 07:50 PM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 05-26-2009, 07:55 PM
  #209  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rhino Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 73N CA
Posts: 474
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Rhino - Sir, read your contract. There simply are not going to be as many unspoken for Delta slots for the most qualified to compete for.
To the best of my knowledge Bar, we currently have flow agreements with CPZ and a handful of Messaba guys. I'm not aware of anything other than that. Please enlighten me. Where in the contract should I be looking?
Rhino Driver is offline  
Old 05-26-2009, 07:56 PM
  #210  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rhino Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 73N CA
Posts: 474
Default

That's a serious question.
Rhino Driver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
Justdoinmyjob
Regional
34
06-04-2009 11:05 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
TPROP4ever
GoJet
322
11-24-2008 08:45 AM
capncrunch
Major
103
11-08-2008 07:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices