100 Seat Jets now flown by Regional Carrier!!
#201
That depends on how many, if any, DAL plans to hire in the future. There are only two regionals under the DAL system with a flowthru agreement as you know, XJ and CZ. 9 per month for XJ making it up to 108 per year, and 20 per month for CZ but no more than 25% of the total number of pilots at CZ which I believe is 25% of approx 330, making it 82.
#202
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
Ok, you win...even though all 3 paragraphs were ASSUMPTIONS on how the regionals will thrive, thus you're playing the odds. GOT IT??? You seem to think you've predicted the future, maybe you should play the lottery. Ever since the first RJ at Comair, it did not take a genius to figure out regionals would grow. After 9/11, it did not take a genius to figure out regionals would grow more. Why you think you've beat the odds is beyond me, anyone could see the obvious shift in flying. There is now a slow shift in the majors favor, we'll see if it continues.
You want to talk 100 seaters at Republic, okay. You're starting to see the junior DAL pilots make some waves on this issue. It will gain speed, as it directly DOES affect us since we own 47% of MEH. They will be flying routes that DAL could(and should) be flying. Our ALPA reps are already being bombarded with calls and emails. They are taking notice and know it is an important issue. I don't know what will happen, but I can say for sure that the junior DAL pilots will fight hard to protect our flying and re-claim what was given away by others in the past.
Please remember, if you respond: IT"S NOT ABOUT YOU!!!
You want to talk 100 seaters at Republic, okay. You're starting to see the junior DAL pilots make some waves on this issue. It will gain speed, as it directly DOES affect us since we own 47% of MEH. They will be flying routes that DAL could(and should) be flying. Our ALPA reps are already being bombarded with calls and emails. They are taking notice and know it is an important issue. I don't know what will happen, but I can say for sure that the junior DAL pilots will fight hard to protect our flying and re-claim what was given away by others in the past.
Please remember, if you respond: IT"S NOT ABOUT YOU!!!
The Midwest pilots wanted to talk to DALPA. Answer: Get lost.
The Midwest pilots warned DALPA about a 100 seat plan. Answer: Get lost.
You made your bed... you need to sleep in it. DALPA has been playing with scope language too long. See you at a regional. Good Luck.
#203
What I find funny Bar is that no one seems to want to respond to what a DCI wide Bi-lateral does.
No one wants to argue that one. Why? Because besides giving up more flying to DCI it is the biggest costs savings too that management can use. It will be packaged as a gain for our group, but in effect, is a concession. (Think Wolf in Sheep's clothing)
#204
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
I understand the military guys want to bypass the regionals, but that time maybe coming to a end.
#206
Someone said this to me and I kind of have to agree, in the next hiring boom there will probably be an increase in the % of military guys hired because they'll probably be 20 year retired military pilots in their early 40s who'd only be accruing seniority at the majors (Delta in this case) for 20-25 years at the most vs the late 20s and early 30 year old crowd they hired that'll be here for 30-35 years.
#207
Someone said this to me and I kind of have to agree, in the next hiring boom there will probably be an increase in the % of military guys hired because they'll probably be 20 year retired military pilots in their early 40s who'd only be accruing seniority at the majors (Delta in this case) for 20-25 years at the most vs the late 20s and early 30 year old crowd they hired that'll be here for 30-35 years.
The past few years were tough for this industry (and others of course)...hence why a majority of guys decided to stay in and protect themselves and their families. You will see a shift in the near future. I know plenty of guys on the fence waiting for things to turn around before they jump.
When they jump, the percentage of those prior military hired will jump accordingly. Always has, always will.
#208
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,993
Rhino - Sir, read your contract. There simply are not going to be as many unspoken for Delta slots for the most qualified to compete for.
Our (yours and mine - no matter which part of Delta you work in) Our MEC Chairmen are pushing it as a lower cost scope substitute. They are talking it up and held a meeting last month to talk it up some more as THE strategic direction our union is taking scope in.
In exchange for giving me a job flying an RJ (which I walked away from top 30% and longevity to come to Delta) our Regionals are offered a someday promise (which might not ever come true in this business) of employment if they give up their longevity to walk across a mostly imaginary line.
This is supposed to replace mainline scope, narrow body fleet replacement / growth and job security and we are supposed to like it. Better yet, it is hoped we never have to use it, because by the look of things it will not work if needed anyway.
This strategic scope plan is a horribly flawed idea. It is so flawed that I do not expect it to really go anywhere, but, it provides political eyewash that many will accept if they don't bother to think about how this would work when called on to function during duress.
It is basically the same system US Air has been trying to implement. If you are curious about how it works, just look over there and follow the plight of US Air pilots at MidAtlantic.
Arguably it has prevented furloughs at Delta because it is unworkable. So there is a "silver lining" to that. Bottom line, flow through agreements are no substitute for having the airplanes flown at mainline by mainline pilots.
In exchange for giving me a job flying an RJ (which I walked away from top 30% and longevity to come to Delta) our Regionals are offered a someday promise (which might not ever come true in this business) of employment if they give up their longevity to walk across a mostly imaginary line.
This is supposed to replace mainline scope, narrow body fleet replacement / growth and job security and we are supposed to like it. Better yet, it is hoped we never have to use it, because by the look of things it will not work if needed anyway.
This strategic scope plan is a horribly flawed idea. It is so flawed that I do not expect it to really go anywhere, but, it provides political eyewash that many will accept if they don't bother to think about how this would work when called on to function during duress.
It is basically the same system US Air has been trying to implement. If you are curious about how it works, just look over there and follow the plight of US Air pilots at MidAtlantic.
Arguably it has prevented furloughs at Delta because it is unworkable. So there is a "silver lining" to that. Bottom line, flow through agreements are no substitute for having the airplanes flown at mainline by mainline pilots.
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 05-26-2009 at 07:50 PM.
#209
To the best of my knowledge Bar, we currently have flow agreements with CPZ and a handful of Messaba guys. I'm not aware of anything other than that. Please enlighten me. Where in the contract should I be looking?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post