Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Cash squeeze may put United in a bind >

Cash squeeze may put United in a bind

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Cash squeeze may put United in a bind

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2009, 02:56 PM
  #1  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Working
Posts: 9
Default Cash squeeze may put United in a bind

AirportBusiness.com » Article » Cash squeeze may put United in a bind

Cash squeeze may put United in a bind

Posted: July 6th, 2009 10:35 AM GMT-05:00
By Julie Johnsson, TRIBUNE REPORTERChicago Tribune



The next few months will be crucial for United Airlines as it and other U.S. airlines cope with a cash squeeze.
The global recession has caused airline ticket sales to plunge deeper than anyone -- carriers or analysts -- anticipated.
Rather than banking cash from peak-season flying this summer as they normally do, United and its peers are paying a king's ransom to borrow money to get them through the winter months, when demand for air travel usually chills.
But after leveraging everything from frequent-flier miles to spare jet engines, United is running low on assets that it can use as collateral for debt or sell to raise cash. That limits the Chicago carrier's options as it faces new requirements by its credit card processors to keep unrestricted cash near the present level of $2.5 billion, analysts said.
The prospect of another lean winter for U.S. carriers could spur more consolidation, analysts said, with United and Houston-based Continental Airlines as the likeliest carriers to head back into merger negotiations.
After talks failed in 2008, the two created a close partnership, or virtual merger, which has recently drawn scrutiny from the Justice Department, potentially making the venture less attractive than a full combination.
"I think that merger makes a lot of sense," said Roger King, airline analyst for CreditSights Inc.
Cash is tight across the airline industry, and Ft. Worth-based American Airlines and Tempe, Ariz.-based US Airways could also face liquidity crises if conditions deteriorate, analysts warned. American faces steep debt payments over the next year and pressure from a credit card processor. US Airways has little debt but thin cash reserves.
"The whole industry is looking at an erosion of liquidity and cash flow," said Bill Warlick, senior director and lead airline analyst with Fitch Ratings. "It's a very grim revenue picture."
The need for action is especially pressing for United. If its cash holdings decline, two major credit card processors, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and American Express, could require it to set aside hundreds of millions of dollars to safeguard advance bookings in case the company folds.
Under an agreement that took effect March 1, American Express requires United to pony up money on a sliding scale if its unrestricted cash falls below $2.4 billion. The lower United's cash, the greater the amount it must set aside. United may also pledge aircraft, real estate and other assets as collateral.
As of January 2010, Chase will require United to hold at least $2.5 billion, a provision that would have cost United $134 million had it been effective in May. If United's cash falls to $1 billion, Chase would require it to set aside half of its monthly credit card charges, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing.
While credit card firms pushed Frontier Airlines into bankruptcy last year, analysts think it very unlikely that they'd pursue similar drastic measures with United unless operations deteriorate to the point where the airline isn't viable.
Chase, in particular, has a deep partnership with United that gives it a vested interest in keeping the carrier aloft. Chase's Mileage Plus affinity card is one of its most popular credit cards, while the bank last year gave United $600 million for the advance purchase of frequent-flier miles. A Chase spokesman declined to comment.
"When you have big boys at the table like credit card companies, and a big airline like United, nobody is going to throw anybody into bankruptcy," King said. "They're going to find a way around it, unless there's no way around it."
United's fortunes could improve if the economy improves, business travel recovers or airline prices start rising in earnest. The nation's third-largest carrier cut earlier and deeper than rivals, positioning it to weather the 15 percent to 20 percent drop in revenues that airlines are likely to see this year.
"We are already benefiting from the cost reductions under way as demonstrated by our strong cost performance over the past several quarters," United spokeswoman Jean Medina said. "Per our second-quarter guidance, we are positioned to gain further competitive advantage in this area, positioning us to get back to profitability as the economy rebounds and for the long term."
United also stands to gain hundreds of millions of dollars related to its fuel hedges if oil prices stay close to current levels.
Still, United's margin to maneuver is slim, analysts said, and could be narrowed further by a number of factors, from another oil spike to a renewed, deadlier outbreak of the swine flu.
"Certainly, they would benefit from any recovery," said Philip Baggaley, managing director and senior credit analyst with Standard & Poor's. "Unfortunately most observers, including Standard & Poor's economists, believe it will be a pretty weak recovery. But anything helps at this point."
United also needs to regain Wall Street's confidence. As of Thursday, its stock had declined 70 percent since January, to $3.31 per share, leaving United with a market capitalization of $476.4 million. That's paltry for one of the world's largest airlines, a carrier that generated $20.2 billion in sales last year.
Another sign of United's tenuous standing on Wall Street: It agreed to pay 17 percent interest on $175 million in debt in late June that was secured by $583 million worth of spare parts.
Lenders aren't fond of such financing because it would be onerous to collect jet engines and the like from warehouses around the world if the airline folded. That fact and the perception of United as a weaker player likely forced United to pay high rates to complete the financing in a market that is wary of airline deals, analysts said.
"This is a trying time," former Continental CEO Gordon Bethune said. "Their cost of debt indicates their weakness in a down market. I'm sure there's a lot of uncertainty out there, not only for employees, but for the public and shareholders."
United did not do the deal out of desperation as some have claimed, Medina said. The transaction "was oversubscribed with terms that reflect the structure, the nature of collateral used and the tight credit market and will further boost our liquidity as we continue to take the right actions in response to the difficult environment."
United has $1.1 billion in unencumbered assets that it could use to raise money, including 63 older aircraft and real estate. The carrier is looking for buyers for the Elk Grove Township campus that serves as its operations center and its pilot training center in Denver, sources said.
But United's classic Boeing 737s are a tough sell in a market glutted with used, parked jets, noted Fitch's Warlick. "They have $1 billion left in assets, but how much could they borrow, how much could they raise in cash? It's nowhere near $1 billion. How much emergency liquidity could they have left? It's probably near $500 million in my opinion."
Cash isn't United's only concern. The carrier has been dinged by consumers in recent satisfaction studies, while its efforts to closely link operations with Continental on international flying have been hung up by last-minute antitrust objections raised by the Justice Department.
The cascading issues, analysts think, could force United to again attempt to merge with Continental, a combination that would create the world's largest airline. Finding financing remains a major obstacle to a merger, although Chase has financial ties to both carriers and could play matchmaker, sources said.
Neither airline would address the renewed merger talk.
With passenger demand in the doldrums and oil prices on the rise, the merger would provide a new source of revenues at a time when pressure on United is growing.
"They're getting the worst of both worlds," Baggaley said of United, American and US Airways. "There certainly is some bankruptcy risk, and those negative external trends are increasing pressure."
[email protected]
FlyingW is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 04:36 AM
  #2  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

I agree. 18% interest and 50 cents on a dollar for their parts means a credit rating of 300. They are still taking the money which means they are in deep do do.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 05:30 AM
  #3  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
Default

I just don't understand how airlines are failing to have positive cash flow with such high load factors. The model is truly broken if airlines can not make cash flow with cheap fuel and full airplanes.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 06:09 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 737 Left
Posts: 828
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
I just don't understand how airlines are failing to have positive cash flow with such high load factors. The model is truly broken if airlines can not make cash flow with cheap fuel and full airplanes.
And all-time low labor costs.
DMEarc is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 06:13 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dragon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Dismayed
Posts: 1,594
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
I just don't understand how airlines are failing to have positive cash flow with such high load factors. The model is truly broken if airlines can not make cash flow with cheap fuel and full airplanes.
I think the marketing gurus are still convinced that we need to keep our planes full no matter how little we charge. If the planes are packed then we simply aren't charging enough.

It could be related to past marketing strategies of building brand loyalty. With a few exceptions, the only loyalty is to the cheapest price!
dragon is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 06:17 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,921
Default

It just goes to show you that pay-cuts do not help the airline in the long-run. The money saved from pay-cuts goes into the CEO's and shareholders pockets. Yet, we will never learn.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 06:34 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
satchip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Flying the SEC
Posts: 2,350
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 View Post
It just goes to show you that pay-cuts do not help the airline in the long-run. The money saved from pay-cuts goes into the CEO's and shareholders pockets. Yet, we will never learn.
That is the purpose of a corporation, to make money for the shareholders. I would love to make tons of money for the shareholders, since I am one. More money for the shareholders means my job is safe and more people are hired below me. I want the union to protect the down side without limiting the up side. Let's not become the UAW or the USW.
satchip is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 06:41 AM
  #8  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

"It agreed to pay 17 percent interest on $175 million in debt in late June that was secured by $583 million worth of spare parts."



This shows the difference in value between the "official" interest rate and the actual price of capital in the real world. The cost of intervention we are all paying for right now.

It is similar to a third world country that has an official exchange rate and a black market rate that has a wide spread. Intervention at work.
jungle is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 06:43 AM
  #9  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Sat,
We cannot become them by pure virtue of how we are limited.

Fact is that we are a minimal cost overall, but one of the ones that is controllable.
If you want to determine the cost of each employee go look at the cost of the health care and add it to your paycheck. It is not too much more than that. It is about 582.00 per month for health care and you pay a very large chunk of that.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 06:44 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 390
Default

Looks like UAL is joining US Air in the airline "zombie" club of the undead.
Wheels up is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chris1987
Major
34
06-30-2009 08:51 PM
Blackbird
Major
17
06-23-2009 09:17 AM
ToiletDuck
Major
6
04-21-2009 06:33 PM
WatchThis!
Union Talk
71
08-01-2008 07:43 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
03-08-2005 11:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices