Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Boeing: new 737 successor by 2012-15 >

Boeing: new 737 successor by 2012-15

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Boeing: new 737 successor by 2012-15

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2006, 07:05 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
SWAjet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B737 Captain
Posts: 437
Default Boeing: new 737 successor by 2012-15

Boeing has taken its first formal step towards launching a replacement for the 737, appointing key personnel to the internal study that has been downplayed for the past several years.

Target date of 2012-2015 for a sucessor to the 737 Next Generation twin jet.

full article
SWAjet is offline  
Old 06-06-2006, 03:53 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Default

I thought they would just keep extending the current model until it holds 300 pax. 737-100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900. 1000?
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 06-06-2006, 06:01 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 260
Default

So i take it that is what SWA will be buying after their 737-7 start showing some age
edik is offline  
Old 06-06-2006, 06:34 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SWAcapt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: B737, Capt.
Posts: 384
Default

My bet is that it will be compatable with the 737 type rating.
SWAcapt is offline  
Old 06-06-2006, 07:14 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Default

Originally Posted by SWAcapt
My bet is that it will be compatable with the 737 type rating.
My first thought was "no way", but you're probably correct. However, I wonder how retaining the type commonality/compatibility will be compatible with a redesign radical enough to make it worth the attempt? I can see how modern electronics,etc, can make a new aircraft mimic it's older brother, but I don't see how the systems that accomplish the jobs using markedly different methods can possibly be similar enough to allow a common type.

I realize that you didn't say "common", but for all intents and purposes, it's either common or nothing. A "compatible" rating would still require a massive transition training disruption; and "compatible" rating would require the FAA's blessing to allow your pilots to fly multiple types on the same trip. Maybe you boys have that much clout with the Feds, but I tend to doubt it. Even if you do, the time/effort/money required to gain FAA acceptance will be large, quite large. In short, making the airplanes similar enought to allow the crews to fly 73's one leg, and mini787's the next is easily possible, getting the Feds to allow doing so will be more trouble.

skybolt
skybolt is offline  
Old 06-06-2006, 08:50 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SWAcapt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: B737, Capt.
Posts: 384
Default

Skybolt, I don't know what your backround is but take it from someone who's flown 737 -2's, 3's, 5's and 700's... the leap from a -200 to the NG700 was shear amazement that it could be flown interchangeably. So having seen this done, it would not suprise me to see it done again. As far as SWA's clout with the FAA, it is really a matter between Boeing and the FAA. We were the launch customer for the -700 and one of the purchase stipulations was that it must be type compatable with the classics. As far as monetary incentive, I think Boeing would try very hard to make it happen if they could sell +/- 500 units to one customer. We have purchased 500+ 737's already. I certainly don't have a crystal ball but just a feeling.

Last edited by SWAcapt; 06-06-2006 at 04:38 PM.
SWAcapt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SWAjet
Major
30
07-22-2007 08:36 PM
fireman0174
Major
4
05-24-2006 08:44 AM
Sasquatch
Cargo
4
05-03-2006 11:33 PM
captain_drew
Hangar Talk
0
12-30-2005 07:03 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
03-07-2005 09:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices