VX to FLL
#11
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 15
Yes, and they left their ALPA carrier to make 95 bucks an hr flying a airliner that everyone else is flying at 150-180 an hr. This is part of the reason it is so hard to get good pay and work rules. We have to compete with a guy willing to make in the left seat what a guy in the right seat would make at a major. (under a concessionary contract)
#12
Funny thing is that DAL,AMR, UAUA etc paid about 235 an hour for that size jet four years ago!
I understand your position, but we as a group cannot expect to ever see this turn around until the entrants to this industry stop paying like this. I have many friends there, and they too HOPE for better.
I understand your position, but we as a group cannot expect to ever see this turn around until the entrants to this industry stop paying like this. I have many friends there, and they too HOPE for better.
#13
Yes, and they left their ALPA carrier to make 95 bucks an hr flying a airliner that everyone else is flying at 150-180 an hr. This is part of the reason it is so hard to get good pay and work rules. We have to compete with a guy willing to make in the left seat what a guy in the right seat would make at a major. (under a concessionary contract)
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
Oh well... here we go again...
Hey ACL65… are you referring to the same ALPA represented pilots who rolled over and took 40 to 50 percent pay cuts, reduction in health benefits, and termination of retirement benefits. Oh yeah… are you referring to the same ALPA guys who agreed to said cuts without repayment of salaries, or restoration of benefits? APLA sure dug their heals in on these issues… didn’t they?
Wear your 25 cent pin with pride.
Yes, and they left their ALPA carrier to make 95 bucks an hr flying a airliner that everyone else is flying at 150-180 an hr. This is part of the reason it is so hard to get good pay and work rules. We have to compete with a guy willing to make in the left seat what a guy in the right seat would make at a major. (under a concessionary contract)
Hey ACL65… are you referring to the same ALPA represented pilots who rolled over and took 40 to 50 percent pay cuts, reduction in health benefits, and termination of retirement benefits. Oh yeah… are you referring to the same ALPA guys who agreed to said cuts without repayment of salaries, or restoration of benefits? APLA sure dug their heals in on these issues… didn’t they?
Wear your 25 cent pin with pride.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
How about...
I see no issue with people working for lower wages. I see no issues with people that are on furlough having to take less than optimal jobs. I see no issues with people making concessions in the hope of regaining better contracts with a better economy. I see no issue with people working for a new entrant hoping for fast advancement.
I might not even have a problem with foreign control of our airlines, if labor protections were put in place, and employees on both sides enjoyed substantial protections. I might not have a problem with Europeans wanting to gain access to a rich domestic market, the infrastructure of which is funded with my tax dollars, and is not subject to competition by subsidized rail, as long as the same could be offered in kind.
But when you have an unbalanced attempt to grab our markets, with nothing similar offered in kind, with obvious disdain of our laws, and without offering us what they consider normal working conditions, then I have a problem both with VA, and those who serve as their instruments.
I feel for the guys that are furloughed. I was in their shoes. I had to take a job I didn't like. I didn't compromise everything thing I believe in to do it. I didn't change who I was. I didn't harm my profession.
#17
...have the dignity not to work there?
I see no issue with people working for lower wages. I see no issues with people that are on furlough having to take less than optimal jobs. I see no issues with people making concessions in the hope of regaining better contracts with a better economy. I see no issue with people working for a new entrant hoping for fast advancement.
I might not even have a problem with foreign control of our airlines, if labor protections were put in place, and employees on both sides enjoyed substantial protections. I might not have a problem with Europeans wanting to gain access to a rich domestic market, the infrastructure of which is funded with my tax dollars, and is not subject to competition by subsidized rail, as long as the same could be offered in kind.
But when you have an unbalanced attempt to grab our markets, with nothing similar offered in kind, with obvious disdain of our laws, and without offering us what they consider normal working conditions, then I have a problem both with VA, and those who serve as their instruments.
I feel for the guys that are furloughed. I was in their shoes. I had to take a job I didn't like. I didn't compromise everything thing I believe in to do it. I didn't change who I was. I didn't harm my profession.
I see no issue with people working for lower wages. I see no issues with people that are on furlough having to take less than optimal jobs. I see no issues with people making concessions in the hope of regaining better contracts with a better economy. I see no issue with people working for a new entrant hoping for fast advancement.
I might not even have a problem with foreign control of our airlines, if labor protections were put in place, and employees on both sides enjoyed substantial protections. I might not have a problem with Europeans wanting to gain access to a rich domestic market, the infrastructure of which is funded with my tax dollars, and is not subject to competition by subsidized rail, as long as the same could be offered in kind.
But when you have an unbalanced attempt to grab our markets, with nothing similar offered in kind, with obvious disdain of our laws, and without offering us what they consider normal working conditions, then I have a problem both with VA, and those who serve as their instruments.
I feel for the guys that are furloughed. I was in their shoes. I had to take a job I didn't like. I didn't compromise everything thing I believe in to do it. I didn't change who I was. I didn't harm my profession.
#18
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 501
Yes, and they left their ALPA carrier to make 95 bucks an hr flying a airliner that everyone else is flying at 150-180 an hr. This is part of the reason it is so hard to get good pay and work rules. We have to compete with a guy willing to make in the left seat what a guy in the right seat would make at a major. (under a concessionary contract)
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
It's not about union membership. Legitimate U.S. airlines, backed by legitimate investors, for the purpose of capturing market share and profits, start up all the time. Their labor is not union at start-up, obviously. I don't look forward to seeing them, but the thought has never occured to me take a public stand against the existence of, for example, Jet Blue. Even if their wages were intially lower, another thing you can't criticize a start-up for.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 142
FYI for all you scholars on here. Today the DOT gave Virgin thumbs up on the ownership structure.
So instead of posting crap like "They are illegal" etc why don't you actually post some substantiated FACTS and not cockpit BS and rumors. I would REALLY like you to post the entire ownership structure of Virgin America because I work here and I don't even know 100% what it is.
So instead of posting crap like "They are illegal" etc why don't you actually post some substantiated FACTS and not cockpit BS and rumors. I would REALLY like you to post the entire ownership structure of Virgin America because I work here and I don't even know 100% what it is.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post