Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
DOT to create panel to fix airline industry >

DOT to create panel to fix airline industry

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

DOT to create panel to fix airline industry

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-16-2009 | 05:23 AM
  #41  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Riddler
Normally I would agree with you. But the only thing worse than a politician is an airline exec.
Ooooooooh... that is a very very close race.. but I have to go wih the politician. Nothing scummier than someone that ALWAYS has his hand out for "contributions".
Reply
Old 11-16-2009 | 05:43 AM
  #42  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Even airline execs need politicians. (Actually every few years the politicians need them to, so it is a relationship of mutual necessity)
Reply
Old 11-16-2009 | 12:52 PM
  #43  
Ziggy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
From: Sofa Stress Tester
Default

Originally Posted by deltabound
To quote P.J. O'Rourke

"Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys. "


Personally, I find it amusing that the same people who are crying that "government screwed up the airlines" are also the same one's who are sure that LOTS more government will somehow "fix" them.

But hey . . .maybe THIS ONE TIME, they'll make things better, eh?
I'm all for smaller government, but some programs should be left to them.
Reply
Old 11-16-2009 | 01:14 PM
  #44  
contrail67's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: 737
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81
De-regulation didn't have to be such a bad thing. But we as humans have no sense of self control. As a fairly junior regional pilot I always say that my job really shouldn't exist. I'm flying at the expense of someone's potentially well secured, great QOL, high paying flight crew position. I would be ok if I lost my job...........only if I knew that the position would NEVER be filled again.

I would vote for you....we need about 10,000 regional pilots with the same realization.
Reply
Old 11-16-2009 | 03:54 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: ERJ CAPT
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81
De-regulation didn't have to be such a bad thing. But we as humans have no sense of self control. As a fairly junior regional pilot I always say that my job really shouldn't exist. I'm flying at the expense of someone's potentially well secured, great QOL, high paying flight crew position. I would be ok if I lost my job...........only if I knew that the position would NEVER be filled again.

Thirty years ago, mid-80s era senior pilots (most now retired) sold out the new hires in A/B scale agreements to protect their own pay increases. This is where the demise of the profession began. Yes deregulation had a lot to do with it, but greedy pilots who were willing to sell out the junior and new-hire FOs and SOs have as much to blame. Yes, at one time you could make a good living and raise a family as a pilot flying CV-580s or YS-11s, but with the A/B scale greements FOs were starting at $30,000 flying 727s. Which meant guys flying D-7s and Metorliners were starting at $18,000/yr. Today guys flying 90 seaters are starting at $13,000/yr. Those junior pilots that were screwed back then are now today's mainline Captains. They too are struggling to make up for their losses over the years. It's not about seats, its about pay!

Once you get on this highway it's darn hard to find an off-ramp.
Reply
Old 11-17-2009 | 04:08 AM
  #46  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
From: The Beginnings
Default

Originally Posted by Onfinal
Thirty years ago, mid-80s era senior pilots (most now retired) sold out the new hires in A/B scale agreements to protect their own pay increases. This is where the demise of the profession began. Yes deregulation had a lot to do with it, but greedy pilots who were willing to sell out the junior and new-hire FOs and SOs have as much to blame.
I agree 100%. Pilots were already well into negotiating B-scales when de-regulation began. De-regulation merely accelerated the process.

RE-regulation is seen as a panacea for pilots pinning for the "good old days". However, the record of the past 30 years strongly suggests that pilots with the most seniority and biggest unions would merely take a bigger piece of the pie and force down "B" and "C" scales to smaller companies and newer entrants.
Reply
Old 12-01-2009 | 04:29 AM
  #47  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

It's interesting that no one has mentioned a national seniority list for all 121 pilots as a possible solution. If congress is bent on writing major legislation, why not put everyone on a list. The benefits would be huge, and it would significantly stabilize the industry. Pilots could shop airlines for the one with the best business model. You would no longer be tied to one carrier and have to go back to the bottom if your latest management team turned out to be bozos and ran the company into bankruptcy! Pay would already be set through negotiations based on number of seats and which seat you are sitting in. If one airline goes bankrupt, those displaced pilots would automatically get picked up in seniority order at other remaining carriers as soon as there are openings. Start-up airlines would have to pull from a pool of qualified listed pilots and pay them the going rate, not some substandard, joke benefits rate that drags down the other carriers. If a new carrier wants to succeed, they would have to have a better product, not just cheap first and second year new hire employees. Airline managements would actually have to MANAGE THE PRODUCT instead of simply lowering costs on the backs of their employees all the time. They would compete for customers based on service, not on costs. My understanding is that this almost happened back in the deregulation era and was part of the original legislation, but was removed in committee by anti-labor forces.
Reply
Old 12-01-2009 | 04:58 AM
  #48  
satchip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 0
From: Flying the SEC
Default

Originally Posted by jaybe90
It's interesting that no one has mentioned a national seniority list for all 121 pilots as a possible solution. If congress is bent on writing major legislation, why not put everyone on a list. The benefits would be huge, and it would significantly stabilize the industry. Pilots could shop airlines for the one with the best business model. You would no longer be tied to one carrier and have to go back to the bottom if your latest management team turned out to be bozos and ran the company into bankruptcy! Pay would already be set through negotiations based on number of seats and which seat you are sitting in. If one airline goes bankrupt, those displaced pilots would automatically get picked up in seniority order at other remaining carriers as soon as there are openings. Start-up airlines would have to pull from a pool of qualified listed pilots and pay them the going rate, not some substandard, joke benefits rate that drags down the other carriers. If a new carrier wants to succeed, they would have to have a better product, not just cheap first and second year new hire employees. Airline managements would actually have to MANAGE THE PRODUCT instead of simply lowering costs on the backs of their employees all the time. They would compete for customers based on service, not on costs. My understanding is that this almost happened back in the deregulation era and was part of the original legislation, but was removed in committee by anti-labor forces.
Dumbest idea ever
Reply
Old 12-01-2009 | 05:02 AM
  #49  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jaybe90
It's interesting that no one has mentioned a national seniority list for all 121 pilots as a possible solution. If congress is bent on writing major legislation, why not put everyone on a list. The benefits would be huge, and it would significantly stabilize the industry. Pilots could shop airlines for the one with the best business model. You would no longer be tied to one carrier and have to go back to the bottom if your latest management team turned out to be bozos and ran the company into bankruptcy! Pay would already be set through negotiations based on number of seats and which seat you are sitting in. If one airline goes bankrupt, those displaced pilots would automatically get picked up in seniority order at other remaining carriers as soon as there are openings. Start-up airlines would have to pull from a pool of qualified listed pilots and pay them the going rate, not some substandard, joke benefits rate that drags down the other carriers. If a new carrier wants to succeed, they would have to have a better product, not just cheap first and second year new hire employees. Airline managements would actually have to MANAGE THE PRODUCT instead of simply lowering costs on the backs of their employees all the time. They would compete for customers based on service, not on costs. My understanding is that this almost happened back in the deregulation era and was part of the original legislation, but was removed in committee by anti-labor forces.

You want the US Gov to figure out a seniority list? Do you trust them to get this right? Have you ever worked for the US Gov?
Reply
Old 12-01-2009 | 06:30 AM
  #50  
i121ADX's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Just a broker now.
Default

Ok here are a few things I see wrong with this.

1. Seniority List Integration. Let's say that DAL would pull over 9E, OH, and XJ. Would a mainline guy be upset that a pilot from one of the regionals is now ahead of him in seniority? C'mon. Think about this.

2. You can't stop outsourcing. It's a disease and every company is doing it to cut costs. There is no more customer service, it's all this fake crap we get on the phone when calling FedEx or UPS. The only customer service I get is from BAX and DHL because they haven't outsourced there forwarder desks.

3. I hate hangovers and somebody should fire the guy that invented them.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skytrekker
Major
6
11-11-2009 09:43 AM
sellener
Flight Schools and Training
12
09-08-2009 09:42 PM
Joachim
Major
63
06-13-2009 06:46 PM
NWA320pilot
Major
2
03-24-2009 07:59 AM
winglet
Regional
45
12-18-2008 05:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices