Educate me
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: A318/319 pic
Gents,
This month I have been flying with a guy who is very much into the politics of the airlines.
This is a tough question. I would love to become a little smarter on this matter and argue an intelligent position, and beat this guy at his own game.
Lastly, I am new to this forum. I am not looking to get (flames?) from anyone. Thank you again for taking the time to give your opinion.
Respectfully from the new guy,
Aloha
This month I have been flying with a guy who is very much into the politics of the airlines.
This is a tough question. I would love to become a little smarter on this matter and argue an intelligent position, and beat this guy at his own game.
Lastly, I am new to this forum. I am not looking to get (flames?) from anyone. Thank you again for taking the time to give your opinion.
Respectfully from the new guy,
Aloha
I'm a little curious who you work for. If it is one of the three companies mentioned above, I would recommend you discuss the issue with one of the other 700+ pilots you work with. If not I would say that this is not the best forum to get a factual information. You will get the whole spectrum of opinions however.
The truth is nothing has been settled with the Frontier/Midwest/Republic/Lynx integration. Until then, it's just a wild guess. As a Frontier pilot, I was a bit insulted by the Southwest offer. From speaking to some friends at Southwest, I would say they were a bit stunned (and insulted) by Frontier's rejection of their offer. Just my take on the situation.
#13
Just some random thoughts, I'm sure others will chime in
Con Republic:
Super low costs are going to be a priority, payscales in danger. Keeping F9 seniority list separate opens the threat of whipsaw using the other Republic pilots against the F9 pilots for concessions, seniority list integration could be very ugly. Unproven leadership in a very tough economic time. Growth might force junior pilots to commute to new bases.
Con Republic:
Super low costs are going to be a priority, payscales in danger. Keeping F9 seniority list separate opens the threat of whipsaw using the other Republic pilots against the F9 pilots for concessions, seniority list integration could be very ugly. Unproven leadership in a very tough economic time. Growth might force junior pilots to commute to new bases.
#14
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: 73 capt
One thing that has not been brought up is the time line was very short and a deal between groups was almost impossible considering the starting positions of both groups. This is of course unfortunate because the industry needs less competition not more. Denver still will not sustain three large operations and sooner or later someone will leave. But before this happens the bleeding will continue. In ten years you will know which was a better deal.
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
#16
Gents,
This month I have been flying with a guy who is very much into the politics of the airlines. He is one of those self-proclaimed experts, who just won’t shut up. He has been discussing at length, his opinions of the whole F9-SWA-Republic thing. I would like to be able to speak with him intellectually on this subject, yet I am relatively uninformed. (I just fly my line, go home, and go fishing.) I am looking for a mature discussion, giving both sides of the argument, with and without the aid of hindsight – in the hopes that I can give some viewpoints from the people who have an intelligent dog in this fight.
My question is this: Did the F9 union make the correct decision for its members by not accepting the SWA staple offer? Are they better off now? Will the F9 pilots be better off with Republic in the future?
This is a tough question. I would love to become a little smarter on this matter and argue an intelligent position, and beat this guy at his own game.
Lastly, I am new to this forum. I am not looking to get (flames?) from anyone. Thank you again for taking the time to give your opinion.
Respectfully from the new guy,
Aloha
This month I have been flying with a guy who is very much into the politics of the airlines. He is one of those self-proclaimed experts, who just won’t shut up. He has been discussing at length, his opinions of the whole F9-SWA-Republic thing. I would like to be able to speak with him intellectually on this subject, yet I am relatively uninformed. (I just fly my line, go home, and go fishing.) I am looking for a mature discussion, giving both sides of the argument, with and without the aid of hindsight – in the hopes that I can give some viewpoints from the people who have an intelligent dog in this fight.
My question is this: Did the F9 union make the correct decision for its members by not accepting the SWA staple offer? Are they better off now? Will the F9 pilots be better off with Republic in the future?
This is a tough question. I would love to become a little smarter on this matter and argue an intelligent position, and beat this guy at his own game.
Lastly, I am new to this forum. I am not looking to get (flames?) from anyone. Thank you again for taking the time to give your opinion.
Respectfully from the new guy,
Aloha
I say change the subject or just let'em run his mouth
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: Furloughed
Working under the republic umbrella is going to lead to constantly declining work rules, quality of life, and pay. Its never going to be the same. Its going to turn into nothing but flying for a regional airline with bigger airplanes.
Not only that, but I honestly don't think they'll even be around much more than a few years. Republic's contracts are all coming up for review in the next 5-7 years and they're ripe for replacement with another carrier. Republic knows nothing about running a real airline that has to make a profit and provide service and those sorts of things. They bought off more than they can chew and it the other airlines are already starting to circle like vultures, especially Southwest.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
The big question is ... WHO CARES? You can't change what has been decided and you'll never know if someone would have had it better.
I would suggest you stick with fishing. And if you have to fly with that bozo again, you change the subject to something more intelluctually appealing.
I would suggest you stick with fishing. And if you have to fly with that bozo again, you change the subject to something more intelluctually appealing.
First off, thank you for attempting to stay informed on the workings of the this profession. Too many pilots just go fishing, and are thusly uninformed on how this industry works. When asked how they might vote on a certain pilot issue, they might reply "I dunno, I don't understand all that Union stuff". Great to have you in the trenches buddy.
Sorry I didn't answer your question about how to argue your particular case; but I do appreciate you staying informed..."Those who ignore or fail to understand History are bound to repeat it" (or something like that)
#19
Banned
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Snowshoe shopping
Should a furloughed Frontier guy have been senior to a non-furloughed Southwest guy? Really? I have no dog in this fight, but I'm curious to see how you justify your position.
Last edited by Spacemann Splif; 12-18-2009 at 01:04 PM.
#20
Only time will tell what was the smart thing to do. There are NO guarantees for any of us.
Just to add to the discourse though, if I remember correctly, Denver would have become a SWA domicile almost immediately. Additionally, it would have been fenced off for F9 pilots for a period of time, guaranteeing their seniority positions as long as they didn't bid out of Denver.
All F9 pilots (who weren't furloughed) would have been pay protected or received a raise up to SWA levels.
On the "bummer" side, I'm pretty sure that SWA would have furloughed up to 100 F9 pilots and pretty much eliminated a lot of the non-flying jobs in Denver. Additionally the Frontier brand would have gone away.
I wish we could have found a way to make it work for all of us, but in the end, I think it was impossible given the time constraints. I also think that RAH wanted F9 much worse than SWA did.
Just to add to the discourse though, if I remember correctly, Denver would have become a SWA domicile almost immediately. Additionally, it would have been fenced off for F9 pilots for a period of time, guaranteeing their seniority positions as long as they didn't bid out of Denver.
All F9 pilots (who weren't furloughed) would have been pay protected or received a raise up to SWA levels.
On the "bummer" side, I'm pretty sure that SWA would have furloughed up to 100 F9 pilots and pretty much eliminated a lot of the non-flying jobs in Denver. Additionally the Frontier brand would have gone away.
I wish we could have found a way to make it work for all of us, but in the end, I think it was impossible given the time constraints. I also think that RAH wanted F9 much worse than SWA did.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




