![]() |
Your kidding right, someone with a lot of time and a spreadsheet program with colors made up those pay scales... I'm a new hire, I don't know what things were like before the bankruptcies.
|
Originally Posted by Kargo
(Post 755751)
Your kidding right, someone with a lot of time and a spreadsheet program with colors made up those pay scales... I'm a new hire, I don't know what things were like before the bankruptcies.
|
How do we go from talking about the PA, to talking about priorities? Sure, we want better crew meals, but does it rank the same as payrates?
How about a way to express where something fits within our priorities? How about a 1-10 scale, where ten is most important? My understanding is that pilots always go for payrates. Off the top of my head, I would want: 10 - Workrules that do not penalize ME for IROPS, OE, etc. 9 - Payrates that a) restore my pay to an acceptable level upfront, and b) are indexed for inflation. 8 - A Reserve System that isn't an Unscheduled Line Holder System: a) Trip Assignment and LC/SC strictly in seniority order, with no Scheduler discretion. b) No 24-hour SC for Int'l. c) Includes a "High" and "Low" option, based on seniority. 8 - Zero Scope/JV concessions. 8 - A medical plan that's designed for me, not UHC. 8 - Increased DC contributions, across the board, with no "matrix", and no attempts at social engineering. These are the staring points, for me. |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 755756)
How do we go from talking about the PA, to talking about priorities? Sure, we want better crew meals, but does it rank the same as payrates?
How about a way to express where something fits within our priorities? How about a 1-10 scale, where ten is most important? My understanding is that pilots always go for payrates. Off the top of my head, I would want: 10 - Workrules that do not penalize ME for IROPS, OE, etc. 9 - Payrates that a) restore my pay to an acceptable level upfront, and b) are indexed for inflation. Indexed to at least two indexes with a backup currency. I know crazy but I think it is a good idea. 8 - A Reserve System that isn't an Unscheduled Line Holder System: a) Trip Assignment and LC/SC strictly in seniority order, with no Scheduler discretion. b) No 24-hour SC for Int'l. c) Includes a "High" and "Low" option, based on seniority. 8 - Zero Scope/JV concessions. 8 - A medical plan that's designed for me, not UHC. 8 - Increased DC contributions, across the board, with no "matrix", and no attempts at social engineering. A good start. |
I want SC to count towards your RAW score. I think this is important for pilots commuting to reserve as you have to fly in and sit reserve but get no credit.
|
I like the list thing that sink was doing. Maybe we can spin off what was done for the December AE...
I believe we (DALPA) and IT (??) should look at trying to change: 1. Recall rights. 180 days is too short. 2. Reserve Raw Score system. Too confusing for slow folks like me. 3. Jumpseat booking procedure. Let's do the computer thing. 4. Jumpseat booking policy. 5 1/2 , 3 1/2, 1 1/2, is too short. 5. Look into a more solid call in honest policy paywise. 6. Simplify passwords for Phone system 7. Look into ACARS logging of landings 8. 9. |
Originally Posted by nwaf16dude
(Post 755742)
I want to see a 1.5 hour bump to reserve guarantee for every short call. Also would like to see some kind of logic tree for how they assign short-call.
|
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 755781)
I like the list thing that sink was doing. Maybe we can spin off what was done for the December AE...
I believe we (DALPA) and IT (??) should look at trying to change: 1. Recall rights. 180 days is too short. 2. Reserve Raw Score system. Too confusing for slow folks like me. 3. Jumpseat booking procedure. Let's do the computer thing. 4. Jumpseat booking policy. 5 1/2 , 3 1/2, 1 1/2, is too short. 5. Look into a more solid call in honest policy paywise. 6. Simplify passwords for Phone system 7. Look into ACARS logging of landings 8. 9. I was rating importance of each issue on a scale of 1-10 (just to pick something). I did that because a comprehensive list would always change as things are added in their right spot. I.e., it allows two people to talk about how much something matters, without consulting a long list of their personal preferences. You're not saying ACARS is a seven out of ten, but Reserve is two, right? Becuase for me, ACARS isn't even on the list of things I want in 2012. Something the company can make better on their own dime, sure, but not something I'm going to use torches and pitchforks over. |
+1. I believe SC should be a choice that comes its' own risk and rewards. You should work less days when you get SC's. They should not count the same as a 12-hour call-out.
Speaking of LC, TWA had (I believe) 9 hours call-out during daytime hours, but 15 hours from evening until morning. That made it a true LC system, friendly to commuters. As an aside, I don't know why we don't have a very small percentage of Reserves on Ready Reserve, for a given duration, at very high Credit. Maybe I only make that distinction because I'm based in New York, where noone can be promptly available to three airports. Maybe SC and "Ready Reserve" means the same thing in other domiciles? But I think it wouldn't be difficult to design a comprehensive system where people get rewarded with more time off for being more avialable during SC, and even more time off for a form of Ready-Reserve. |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 755811)
new:
I was rating importance of each issue on a scale of 1-10 (just to pick something). I did that because a comprehensive list would always change as things are added in their right spot. I.e., it allows two people to talk about how much something matters, without consulting a long list of their personal preferences. You're not saying ACARS is a seven out of ten, but Reserve is two, right? Becuase for me, ACARS isn't even on the list of things I want in 2012. Something the company can make better on their own dime, sure, but not something I'm going to use torches and pitchforks over. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:26 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands