Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Are AirTran guys happy? >

Are AirTran guys happy?

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Are AirTran guys happy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2010 | 06:14 AM
  #11  
New Hire
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Boeing CA
Default

The best advice I could give you is to look for a company that views its employees as ASSETS and not LIABILITIES. The list is short and AirTran is not on it. Otherwise, Re-up.

O
Reply
Old 04-18-2010 | 07:38 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bull
I feel like I have done research, and I didn't see the future as bleak as you guys did. I saw all the baby-boomers getting to retirement age in the next few years with a ton of retirements happening, starting in 2012-13. You don't see movement once the age 65 change is fully integrated and people are once again retiring?? I guess I am a "glass half full" guy, or just really stupid!! I hope it's not the latter, but only time will tell...thanks for all your inputs.
Hope you're right. Maybe once the age 65 dam bursts, things will improve.
Reply
Old 04-18-2010 | 07:45 AM
  #13  
Tony Nelson's Avatar
Fore!
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: 756 F/O
Default

Originally Posted by bull
Hey BC,
I appreciate your input...is it really that bad? 10-12 year upgrade? That is crazy!! You are almost making me want to return to active duty!! It can't be that bad, can it??? How long have you been there?
Bull, you should have stayed on active duty. The pay is much better, the retirement is much better, the QWL is better unless you are senior at an airline and the job security is much better. If it was me, I would have at least stayed thru 2012 when retirements start again. My 2 cents.
Reply
Old 04-18-2010 | 08:36 AM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Nelson
Bull, you should have stayed on active duty. The pay is much better, the retirement is much better, the QWL is better unless you are senior at an airline and the job security is much better. If it was me, I would have at least stayed thru 2012 when retirements start again. My 2 cents.
Tony...I am guessing that you were military by your avatar...the airframe that I was in, I was gone about 285 days/year. I got out because I have a great reserve job that allows me to work alot. I would have never gotten out without a reserve job. I would like to get into the airlines right before what I think would be a big hiring time (hopefully around 2012). I won't know if I make the right choice until I look back when the ride is over....time will tell!! Thanks for your input...
Reply
Old 04-19-2010 | 05:05 AM
  #15  
Tony Nelson's Avatar
Fore!
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: 756 F/O
Default

Originally Posted by bull
Tony...I am guessing that you were military by your avatar...the airframe that I was in, I was gone about 285 days/year. I got out because I have a great reserve job that allows me to work alot. I would have never gotten out without a reserve job. I would like to get into the airlines right before what I think would be a big hiring time (hopefully around 2012). I won't know if I make the right choice until I look back when the ride is over....time will tell!! Thanks for your input...
Bull, yes, your guessing was correct. I got off active duty in 2000 with a reserve job(traditional) and hired by a major. I got furloughed after 9/11 and then transferred to the ANG for an AGR job so I could get a 20 year retirement. Best thing I ever did.
You didn't say how many active years you have but if you can get an AGR slot with your reserve unit it may pay dividends in the future. You could still apply for airline jobs. If you got hired, then you could take Mil leave if you were close to your 20 yrs. Just something to think about. Hopefully when 2012 hits and folks start to retire again much of the current chaos will disappear.
Reply
Old 04-19-2010 | 05:25 AM
  #16  
NWA320pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
From: 737 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
Yes it really is that bad at the majors. Think impact of age 65, no growth etc. If you are not prepared to be an FO for 10 to 15 years at a major, you might want to rethink your career choice. Not trying to be obnoxious just realistic at this point.

Denny
This is a very accurate statement! As mentioned the path to the left seat will be long at all majors..... It's not just the age 65 ruling, the airlines have been cutting capacity for years and there doesn't appear to be any significant capacity increase for some time.
Reply
Old 04-19-2010 | 05:44 AM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Default Heath insurance cost at Airtran

I knew someone who went to Airtran in 2004.

At the time his health insurance was something like $835 per month.

Is it still that high?

Something else to think about.
Reply
Old 04-19-2010 | 05:51 AM
  #18  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
This is a very accurate statement! As mentioned the path to the left seat will be long at all majors..... It's not just the age 65 ruling, the airlines have been cutting capacity for years and there doesn't appear to be any significant capacity increase for some time.
Nicely said. Alot also depends on what kind of scope relief, if any, is negotiated by pilot unions in current contract negotiations. If scope is given up in the 90 to 110 seat range, there will be even further cuts and it will be the death knell for getting quality people in this job.

I'm not saying unions will give up scope, just saying if they do...........

Denny
Reply
Old 04-19-2010 | 07:18 AM
  #19  
MidNightRider's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Default A few Airtran cons/pros

I'm retired military (best decision I ever made was to stay in until retirement). Don't get out thinking the grass is greener on the other side. Some quick pros/cons on AirTran from my point of view.
Cons:
- Hostile work environment (very hard to adjust to after excellent leadership in military).
- Very poor/inefficient management (if we get a competative contract we will no longer be able to compete against Southwest and JetBlue).
- Inability to weather another economic shock (we were hours from bankruptcy when oil went to $140/barrel). A new contract combined with another economic shock will cause the Tranz to fold like a circus tent (we are not to big to fail like Detla/United/American).

Pros:
- Better place to keep currency than the regionals (they treat you poorly here, but at least you're paid better than starting regional pay).
- Good company contribution into plan B fund (but only vested after 3 years).
- Very good training department, but that may change when AQP is forced on us by FAA.

Once again, if you already have a good gig don't leave it for AirTran.
Reply
Old 04-19-2010 | 08:48 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Default

................
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aircraftdriver
Major
45
11-09-2009 03:42 PM
gearhorn
Cargo
45
09-23-2009 06:33 AM
1900Driver
Major
22
07-06-2009 05:49 PM
Spaceman Spliff
Mergers and Acquisitions
69
08-13-2008 10:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices