Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Support these changes to FAA Flight Time NPRM >

Support these changes to FAA Flight Time NPRM

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Support these changes to FAA Flight Time NPRM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2010 | 02:08 PM
  #1  
exeagle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: DL
Default Support these changes to FAA Flight Time NPRM

Got this today from CAPA. Has ALPA sent out anything like this??


The FAA has recently been charged by Congress and the Administration to develop a set of comprehensive new rules regarding "Flight Crew member Rest and Duty Requirements". The proposed changes in the FAA's recently-issued Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on "Flight and Duty Time" (FT/DT) regulations represents an improvement to current regulations and covers all commercial operations in the spirit of "One Level of Safety".
However, there are some specific items that need to be changed in order to mitigate fatigue for the professional pilot. They are as follows:

1) The flight time limit should not be increased 25%; from 8 hours to 10 hours.
2) The augmented (3-person) flight time limit should not be increased 25%; from 12 to 15 hours.
3) Rest requirements should be 10 hours domestic; and 14 hours international. 9 hours, reducible to 8 hours, is not enough time to achieve restorative sleep, eat, and attend to personal hygiene between duty periods.
4) Domestic augmentation should not be allowed.

Please join us in letting your congressional representatives know the importance of achieving these meaningful improvements to flight and duty time regulations. Your participation in the letter-writing campaign to Capitol Hill is extremely important; it will ensure that your opinions are heard on this most important matter: Pilot Fatigue. Pease send a letter today!

To participate in sending a letter to Congress, follow these few simple steps:

1) Go to www.capapilots.org, click on the "Contact Your Legislators" button on right side of the CAPA Home Page.
2) Under "Current Action Alerts" header, click on "Support These Changes to the FAA's Flight Time/Duty Time NPRM"
3) Enter your zip code in the "Action Alert" box, write your name in the "Your Name" box, enter your sender information below and click "Send Message."

For additional information on this issue, please click on this link "CAPA Flight Time/Duty Time Talking Points"(http://www.capapilots.org/flight-timeduty-time-ftdt-capa-talking-points).


The Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations is a trade association which represents more than 28,000 professional pilots at carriers including American Airlines, Southwest Airlines, UPS Airlines, US Airways, Atlas Air Cargo, Kalitta Air, Polar Air Cargo, Southern Air, Gulstream Air, Cape Air, Miami Air, Omni Air and USA 3000.
Reply
Old 10-26-2010 | 02:31 PM
  #2  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by exeagle
Got this today from CAPA. Has ALPA sent out anything like this??


The FAA has recently been charged by Congress and the Administration to develop a set of comprehensive new rules regarding "Flight Crew member Rest and Duty Requirements". The proposed changes in the FAA's recently-issued Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on "Flight and Duty Time" (FT/DT) regulations represents an improvement to current regulations and covers all commercial operations in the spirit of "One Level of Safety".
However, there are some specific items that need to be changed in order to mitigate fatigue for the professional pilot. They are as follows:

1) The flight time limit should not be increased 25%; from 8 hours to 10 hours.
2) The augmented (3-person) flight time limit should not be increased 25%; from 12 to 15 hours.
3) Rest requirements should be 10 hours domestic; and 14 hours international. 9 hours, reducible to 8 hours, is not enough time to achieve restorative sleep, eat, and attend to personal hygiene between duty periods.
4) Domestic augmentation should not be allowed.

Please join us in letting your congressional representatives know the importance of achieving these meaningful improvements to flight and duty time regulations. Your participation in the letter-writing campaign to Capitol Hill is extremely important; it will ensure that your opinions are heard on this most important matter: Pilot Fatigue. Pease send a letter today!

To participate in sending a letter to Congress, follow these few simple steps:

1) Go to www.capapilots.org, click on the "Contact Your Legislators" button on right side of the CAPA Home Page.
2) Under "Current Action Alerts" header, click on "Support These Changes to the FAA's Flight Time/Duty Time NPRM"
3) Enter your zip code in the "Action Alert" box, write your name in the "Your Name" box, enter your sender information below and click "Send Message."

For additional information on this issue, please click on this link "CAPA Flight Time/Duty Time Talking Points"(http://www.capapilots.org/flight-timeduty-time-ftdt-capa-talking-points).


The Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations is a trade association which represents more than 28,000 professional pilots at carriers including American Airlines, Southwest Airlines, UPS Airlines, US Airways, Atlas Air Cargo, Kalitta Air, Polar Air Cargo, Southern Air, Gulstream Air, Cape Air, Miami Air, Omni Air and USA 3000.
Couldn't agree more.

But to answer your question, No...ALPA has not put anything like this out. The only thing ALPA has put out is their AGREEMENT to the NPRM as it stands right now. That's right, ALPA supports it just as it is.

Carl
Reply
Old 10-26-2010 | 08:10 PM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Default

FWIW, I got this off the Alpa website

As mentioned above, the FTDT Committee and ALPA ARC participants will submit our comments to the FAA by the November 15th deadline. The basis for comment will be ALPA policy. Once again, outlining these components for you today does not imply ALPA’s agreement or disagreement with the NPRM in any way. As we learn more about the NPRM, we will update you on that information as well as the final comment to the FAA.
Reply
Old 10-26-2010 | 08:12 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: SLC ERB
Default

Originally Posted by exeagle
Got this today from CAPA. Has ALPA sent out anything like this??


The FAA has recently been charged by Congress and the Administration to develop a set of comprehensive new rules regarding "Flight Crew member Rest and Duty Requirements". The proposed changes in the FAA's recently-issued Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on "Flight and Duty Time" (FT/DT) regulations represents an improvement to current regulations and covers all commercial operations in the spirit of "One Level of Safety".
However, there are some specific items that need to be changed in order to mitigate fatigue for the professional pilot. They are as follows:

1) The flight time limit should not be increased 25%; from 8 hours to 10 hours.
2) The augmented (3-person) flight time limit should not be increased 25%; from 12 to 15 hours.
3) Rest requirements should be 10 hours domestic; and 14 hours international. 9 hours, reducible to 8 hours, is not enough time to achieve restorative sleep, eat, and attend to personal hygiene between duty periods.
4) Domestic augmentation should not be allowed.

Please join us in letting your congressional representatives know the importance of achieving these meaningful improvements to flight and duty time regulations. Your participation in the letter-writing campaign to Capitol Hill is extremely important; it will ensure that your opinions are heard on this most important matter: Pilot Fatigue. Pease send a letter today!

To participate in sending a letter to Congress, follow these few simple steps:

1) Go to www.capapilots.org, click on the "Contact Your Legislators" button on right side of the CAPA Home Page.
2) Under "Current Action Alerts" header, click on "Support These Changes to the FAA's Flight Time/Duty Time NPRM"
3) Enter your zip code in the "Action Alert" box, write your name in the "Your Name" box, enter your sender information below and click "Send Message."

For additional information on this issue, please click on this link "CAPA Flight Time/Duty Time Talking Points"(http://www.capapilots.org/flight-timeduty-time-ftdt-capa-talking-points).


The Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations is a trade association which represents more than 28,000 professional pilots at carriers including American Airlines, Southwest Airlines, UPS Airlines, US Airways, Atlas Air Cargo, Kalitta Air, Polar Air Cargo, Southern Air, Gulstream Air, Cape Air, Miami Air, Omni Air and USA 3000.
I agree - extending the amount of flying that can be done lessens fatigue how?

However, why the difference between domestic and international? That's the one thing that I DO agree with the NPRM on - the rules should be blind to what whether or not the flight crosses a border - flag/domestic should be held to the same standards of fatigue. What's wrong with domestic augmented crews? How is that different than an international augmented crew? What it boils down to is how much flying is done (block), how long the duty day is, the number of legs during the duty period, how the duty day aligns with normal sleep patterns (allowing for the effects of crossing time zones), and the ability to rest during the duty period (ie. augmented crews). Differentiating between domestic/international (domestic/flag) really doesn't make any sense.
Reply
Old 10-26-2010 | 08:49 PM
  #5  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by 757golf
FWIW, I got this off the Alpa website

As mentioned above, the FTDT Committee and ALPA ARC participants will submit our comments to the FAA by the November 15th deadline. The basis for comment will be ALPA policy. Once again, outlining these components for you today does not imply ALPA’s agreement or disagreement with the NPRM in any way. As we learn more about the NPRM, we will update you on that information as well as the final comment to the FAA.
ALPA has been in D.C. too long, legalize that means nada and if you pin them down they act like a bar of wet soap and slip away not to be caught unless you are willing to bend over.
Reply
Old 10-27-2010 | 05:39 AM
  #6  
EWRflyr's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 17
From: 737 CAPT
Default

ALPA has not given their consent to this. They even came out saying while some portions of the proposal were a step in the right direction, other parts were not. They essentially gave the same response as the other unions.

As was stated by our MEC chairman on last week's conference call, ALPA decided to hold off on giving a full in-depth response because there was an opportunity to address and analyze the issue at the BOD. The timing of the NPRM coincided with the BOD allowing a full response to be developed prior to the comment period closing.

I prefer a thoughtful, in-depth, reasoned response by my union and not just a knee-jerk response. A deadline is a deadline, so I am willing to give ALPA a chance to develop a well-thought out, researched response before I add my opinion to the NPRM. That doesn't mean I don't have one already.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rickB
Part 135
29
10-26-2011 01:12 PM
sailingfun
Major
62
11-05-2009 06:54 PM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
aafurloughee
Fractional
41
06-25-2008 06:43 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices