TSA Issues: A Combined List
#111
Ref +8
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: North by Midwest
This is news to me. An Airport can "opt-out" of TSA services and hire thier own security.
Amid airport anger, GOP takes aim at screening | Washington Examiner
Amid airport anger, GOP takes aim at screening | Washington Examiner
Last edited by flywithjohn; 11-16-2010 at 11:57 PM. Reason: Typing errors
#112
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: emb-145 ca
All in the name of "security." All to stop terrorists from "succeeding."
How much freedom and liberty do we have to lose before the terrorists have, in fact, won their victory? How much money can we really spend to fight them? For every $1 the jihadists spend, we probably spend $10,000 to fight/slow/stop/disrupt them. When we have spent ourselves into so much debt that we have no way and no hope to repay it, how secure are we then?
The U.S. military operation in Afghanistan annually costs the U.S. around 6 times that nation's ENTIRE economy. If the U.S. had simply given all that money directly to the Afghan people, the standard of living of those people would have been six times higher than it is (if you could keep corruption under control). How interested in global jihad would those people be if they had a life that was 6 times more comfortable than what they have now?
We are fools. Osama is sitting around his warm campfire talking with his buddies right now. They are drinking tea and telling stories about how in only 10 short years they got Americans to rip out their own souls with their own hands and strangle them dead in front of their own children-- souls that long ago valued liberty above all else, even our own lives.They are laughing at us. They should be.
We are fools.
Last edited by CaptainNameless; 11-17-2010 at 02:04 AM.
#113
Line Holder
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Amen. UBL said he would bankrupt us (as his people did the Russians in Afghanistan the 80's), and he is well on his way to success. He has also changed our psyche...we used to pride ourselves on independence and self-reliance. Now we cringe before governmental thuggery, not just the TSA, but in many, many other ways. Sad, UBL is winning, hands down. Sam
Last edited by Semaphore Sam; 11-17-2010 at 02:31 AM. Reason: grammer mistake
#114
Guest
Posts: n/a
Amen. UBL said he would bankrupt us (as his people did the Russians in Afghanistan the 80's), and he is well on his way to success. He has also changed our psyche...we used to pride ourselves on independence and self-reliance. Now we cringe before governmental thuggery, not just the TSA, but in many, many other ways. Sad, UBL is winning, hands down. Sam
#115
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: A-320/A
No. It's NOT a tough call. I would rather get blown up than live in police state where 5 year olds get molested as a matter of security policy. Where a government can order you to either risk increasing your chances of developing cancer, or face getting hand-raped.
All in the name of "security." All to stop terrorists from "succeeding."
How much freedom and liberty do we have to lose before the terrorists have, in fact, won their victory? How much money can we really spend to fight them? For every $1 the jihadists spend, we probably spend $10,000 to fight/slow/stop/disrupt them. When we have spent ourselves into so much debt that we have no way and no hope to repay it, how secure are we then?
The U.S. military operation in Afghanistan annually costs the U.S. around 6 times that nation's ENTIRE economy. If the U.S. had simply given all that money directly to the Afghan people, the standard of living of those people would have been six times higher than it is (if you could keep corruption under control). How interested in global jihad would those people be if they had a life that was 6 times more comfortable than what they have now?
We are fools. Osama is sitting around his warm campfire talking with his buddies right now. They are drinking tea and telling stories about how in only 10 short years they got Americans to rip out their own souls with their own hands and strangle them dead in front of their own children-- souls that long ago valued liberty above all else, even our own lives.They are laughing at us. They should be.
We are fools.
All in the name of "security." All to stop terrorists from "succeeding."
How much freedom and liberty do we have to lose before the terrorists have, in fact, won their victory? How much money can we really spend to fight them? For every $1 the jihadists spend, we probably spend $10,000 to fight/slow/stop/disrupt them. When we have spent ourselves into so much debt that we have no way and no hope to repay it, how secure are we then?
The U.S. military operation in Afghanistan annually costs the U.S. around 6 times that nation's ENTIRE economy. If the U.S. had simply given all that money directly to the Afghan people, the standard of living of those people would have been six times higher than it is (if you could keep corruption under control). How interested in global jihad would those people be if they had a life that was 6 times more comfortable than what they have now?
We are fools. Osama is sitting around his warm campfire talking with his buddies right now. They are drinking tea and telling stories about how in only 10 short years they got Americans to rip out their own souls with their own hands and strangle them dead in front of their own children-- souls that long ago valued liberty above all else, even our own lives.They are laughing at us. They should be.
We are fools.
Chuck
#116
This farce must end. Profile for Pete's sake. If it looks like terrorist or is acting oddly, screen it!
Seeing numerous reports that the traveling public may have finally had it. `Fed Up' Passengers, Unions Balk at Airports' Wider Use of Full-Body Scans - Bloomberg
#117
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 285
I use to be a airport PD LEO, I've been saying for years that TSA needs to be revamped into an oversight agency and that the airport security needs to be under the charge of the municipal, county and state controlling agencies. Whenever TSA has trouble or wants to press charges the charging agency is always either the Airport PD or the County Sheriff, I say eliminate the federal BS and let the Airport Authority PD deal with it. It would be cheaper, more efficiently run and best of all no federal BS, TSA needs to be downgraded to a supervisory agency and not the controlling one.
#118
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
SFO's security is a private company and not TSA.
Here's the link...
TSA: TSA Awards San Francisco International Airport Private Screening Contract Under Screening Partnership Program
Here's the link...
TSA: TSA Awards San Francisco International Airport Private Screening Contract Under Screening Partnership Program
#119
This is the support we need.
TSA chief faces lawmakers on pat-downs, body scans - CNN.com
In a letter to aviation authorities, Rep. John Mica, R-Florida, raised the idea of privatization at transport hubs, which he said could improve efficiency and enable airports to opt out of TSA safety regulations.
"It is both inappropriate and inefficient for the TSA to serve as the administrator, quality assurance regulator, operator and auditor of its own activities," Mica, currently the ranking member of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said in the letter.
"My aviation subcommittee staff would be pleased to assist you should you move forward with your decision to opt to have a certified private screening program at your airport," he said.
TSA chief faces lawmakers on pat-downs, body scans - CNN.com
In a letter to aviation authorities, Rep. John Mica, R-Florida, raised the idea of privatization at transport hubs, which he said could improve efficiency and enable airports to opt out of TSA safety regulations.
"It is both inappropriate and inefficient for the TSA to serve as the administrator, quality assurance regulator, operator and auditor of its own activities," Mica, currently the ranking member of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said in the letter.
"My aviation subcommittee staff would be pleased to assist you should you move forward with your decision to opt to have a certified private screening program at your airport," he said.
#120
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Guys,
Sorry to be so uninformed, I am comming of 12 days off and I don't watch news much.
Could you summarize the current situation for me, please:
1. Do I have to go through the body scanner i.e. can I opt out and be manually searched instead?
2. Are the body scanners harmful to health?
Thx
Sorry to be so uninformed, I am comming of 12 days off and I don't watch news much.
Could you summarize the current situation for me, please:
1. Do I have to go through the body scanner i.e. can I opt out and be manually searched instead?
2. Are the body scanners harmful to health?
Thx
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



