Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
ACT NOW ! Shuster to gut FT/DT in FAA Bill >

ACT NOW ! Shuster to gut FT/DT in FAA Bill

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

ACT NOW ! Shuster to gut FT/DT in FAA Bill

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2011, 03:43 PM
  #91  
Indian Takeout Driver
 
CE750's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FAR part 347 (91+121+135)
Posts: 1,566
Default

Originally Posted by 4andCounting
Could someone clarify this for me. Is this the one where all new regulations would have to pass a cost benefit analysis as well? Or is that a separate amendment?
yes, this was the amendment which said a cost benefit study would have to be done before ANY new regulation was written... Which in Republican speak basically means no new regulations by the FAA.. It further stated that not all air carriers are the same, therefore not all regs should be the same...

It's dead RIP.. Aug 1 will now likely hit a lot of carriers like a freight train if they've not been hiring to meet new requirements.
CE750 is offline  
Old 05-23-2011, 04:38 PM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 199
Default

Originally Posted by 4andCounting
Could someone clarify this for me. Is this the one where all new regulations would have to pass a cost benefit analysis as well? Or is that a separate amendment?
Could someone clarify how this "might" affect all of the 121 companies? ie. what I am most interested in, hiring. I know that no one has a crystal ball but I am sure there is some conjecture bouncing around.
Rickce7 is offline  
Old 05-23-2011, 05:31 PM
  #93  
Indian Takeout Driver
 
CE750's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FAR part 347 (91+121+135)
Posts: 1,566
Default

the longer haul outfits will feel it most... gone will be the 24 hour+ duty days... the 10 hours flight time for 3 man (2 pilot plus 1 FE) crews and starting and stopping at any hour of the day, without consideration for body clock... also if your company relies on min rest (8 hours on the ground), then that's gone too.... now its going to be 9 hours AT THE HOTEL.

there are a lot more limit changes, and in a nutshell it WILL spell jobs.
CE750 is offline  
Old 05-23-2011, 05:34 PM
  #94  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 65
Default

Originally Posted by CE750

It's dead RIP.. Aug 1 will now likely hit a lot of carriers like a freight train if they've not been hiring to meet new requirements.
Aug 1st is only when the rule must be published. There will be a period of time in which the airlines can adjust to the rule. Just like the ATP/1500 rule won't go into effect for 3 years from when that came out.
piperpilot12w is offline  
Old 05-23-2011, 05:40 PM
  #95  
Indian Takeout Driver
 
CE750's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FAR part 347 (91+121+135)
Posts: 1,566
Default

Originally Posted by piperpilot12w
Aug 1st is only when the rule must be published. There will be a period of time in which the airlines can adjust to the rule. Just like the ATP/1500 rule won't go into effect for 3 years from when that came out.
this is purely hearsay or "Friend of a Friend" but I have a friend, who has a friend at the FAA who says that this is not the case... Aug 1 is D day..

I am open to being corrected, has anyone got evidence of anything different?

edit: better yet, I will ask my friend at the FAA to dig up a good answer... he's not in that department, but surely he can find out.
CE750 is offline  
Old 05-23-2011, 08:32 PM
  #96  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 95
Default

Originally Posted by piperpilot12w
Aug 1st is only when the rule must be published. There will be a period of time in which the airlines can adjust to the rule. Just like the ATP/1500 rule won't go into effect for 3 years from when that came out.
Nope. Read the legislation more carefully. August 1st is the deadline the airlines have to adjust. They were already given their "heads up" for rest rules. (the bill stated 1 year) You are correct about the ATP however.
plt32173 is offline  
Old 05-24-2011, 02:30 AM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by plt32173
Nope. Read the legislation more carefully. August 1st is the deadline the airlines have to adjust. They were already given their "heads up" for rest rules. (the bill stated 1 year) You are correct about the ATP however.
^^^^^^^^^^Incorrect. There WILL be a phase in of the new rules.
shiznit is offline  
Old 05-24-2011, 04:24 AM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
slumav505's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: EMB-145 CA
Posts: 456
Default

I imagine n the next few weeks (i had heard the beginning to middle of June) the final ruling will be in place. In recurrent our DO was under the impression that these rules would be in play August 1. I wouldn't be surprised if the airlines have to publish their plan of compliance August 1 and be in full compliance by Jan 1. Just wait and see. They have had a year to try and fight this or figure a way to make it work.

Ticket prices just went up though, that's for sure.
slumav505 is offline  
Old 05-24-2011, 05:01 AM
  #99  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 95
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
^^^^^^^^^^Incorrect. There WILL be a phase in of the new rules.
Not so much. Here is the actual language with links to the documents:

On August 1, 2010, the President signed the Airline Safety and Federal Aviation
Administration Extension Act of 2010, P.L. 111-216 (the Act). In section 212 of the Act,
Congress directed the FAA to issue regulations no later than August 1, 2011 to “specify
limitations on the hours of flight and duty time allowed for pilots to address problems
relating to pilot fatigue.”


http://www.faa.gov/regulations_polic...2010_22626.pdf

PUBLIC LAW 111–216—AUG. 1, 2010

SEC. 212. PILOT FATIGUE.
(a) FLIGHT AND DUTY TIME REGULATIONS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with paragraph (3), the
Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall
issue regulations, based on the best available scientific information,
to specify limitations on the hours of flight and duty
time allowed for pilots to address problems relating to pilot
fatigue.

(3) RULEMAKING.—The Administrator shall issue—
(A) not later than 180 days after the date of enactment
of this Act, a notice of proposed rulemaking under paragraph
(1); and
(B) not later than one year after the date of enactment
of this Act, a final rule under paragraph (1).


http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-11...111publ216.pdf

The date of enactment is August 1st 2010
plt32173 is offline  
Old 05-24-2011, 05:08 AM
  #100  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 72
Default

CE750
It's dead RIP.. Aug 1 will now likely hit a lot of carriers like a freight train if they've not been hiring to meet new requirements.


I hope you are right but I don't believe it will. I think the FAA will water down the proposal.

Also, the proposal has to be issued by Aug 1, 2011, implementation is Aug 1, 2013, so airlines have 2 years to hire. This according to the FAA as listed in the proposal
757golf is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Airsupport
Union Talk
46
01-10-2008 08:22 AM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
49
10-11-2007 01:14 PM
bla bla bla
Regional
49
09-30-2007 07:56 AM
waflyboy
Union Talk
6
09-27-2007 12:40 PM
NoHaz
Cargo
3
07-02-2007 05:36 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices