Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Without Seniority

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2011 | 02:11 AM
  #21  
SONORA PASS's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Left - Dodge Caravan
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
While 80ktsClamp is quite correct and that is the history of the industry, a counterargument can be made that seniority has had lots of downsides during deregulation. Seniority makes mobility between airlines impossible in the case of bankruptcy; pilots are tied to the airline hired on with, perhaps 20 years before. It becomes a barricade to a career. Seniority systems are the core of merger disputes on integration; careers can be devastated by nasty integration battles. Witness: US Airways and AmWest. Pilots have gone to their graves complaining about integration schemes of the UAL/Capitol merger.

No ideas on a fix

GF
Of course the problem could be looked at another way.

Keep the seniority numbers... just change the compensation, schedule and quality of life slope between the junior and senior. That wide divide is the real issue. No one wants to have to start over when the slope is that steep.

SP
Reply
Old 08-02-2011 | 05:52 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,233
Likes: 197
From: B737CA
Default

Personally, I think seniority should apply for vacation accruals, boarding priority on non-rev travel, and things like that. But it should not govern everything in life, and especially not pay.

Year 1 pay at US airlines should apply to newbies fresh outta flight school with no experience.

I think Emirates has a decent setup that I think would be a good starting point in the US. The problem is that US pilots are too entrenched in this seniority game to ever consider change...
Reply
Old 08-02-2011 | 06:14 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
The problem is that US pilots are too entrenched in this seniority game to ever consider change...
Not necessarily entrenched as many would like to seriously look at re-vamping how one gets paid over a career. The problem you'll face, however, is convincing those who did suffer the years of low wages to give up their now "high" wages. How do you bring up the junior low wages without taking from those who "paid their dues?"
Reply
Old 08-02-2011 | 06:16 AM
  #24  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by RockChalk
How do you think the industry would be different, especially at the majors, if seniority was not the basis of everything? In Corporate America, you never hear people talk about their Date of Hire when it comes to trying to move up the proverbial food chain. I'd be curious to hear how it would be if that was the case at the airlines. It's an interesting thought to consider, and I look forward to your views.
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
If there was no seniority, then it would be much easier to switch between carriers. If Airline A closed your base, you could jump ship to Airline B and be based at home. If Airline A started cutting pay and benefits then you could jump to Airline C and get a pay raise.

The seniority system has been created by unions, so that they have a reason to exist. If the responsibility was on the company to provide excellent pay/QOL to attract employees then there would be little need for a union.
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
Id like to see all part 121 training conducted by a Flightsafety-type company, and have standardized flows/profiles for a given equip. If you fly the 737 for Airline A then it would be the same operationally as Airline B. If you were flying the same equip previously then you would only go through indoc at a new airline.

Advancement would be tougher than it is today. If airlines need 737 CAs they would put out a job listing and anyone can apply. If they hire someone without 737 experience then they have to send them to the Flightsafety-type training, but if they hire an existing 737 CA/FO then it wouldnt be required.


But... we are replaceable. We arent all special little snowflakes, we are units on a balance sheet in the cog of the industry. There are hundreds of jobs in this country which are all 'replaceable' but are non-union positions. Unions dont stop labor from being exploited, they merely provide a framework for that to happen legally.
Originally Posted by LuvJockey
Who do you think that the company management will make the Captain? Captain A will fly with a broken airplane, Captain B won't?
Originally Posted by Timbo
What you are describing can already be seen...in the military flying ops.

Get some good kneepads if you want to go in that direction for a 30+ year career.
Originally Posted by Lifeisgood
I came to America from a country with no seniority. It sucked, absolutely sucked. All the negatives were already mentioned above.
The hardest part was seeing how guys who kiss butts become A320/737 captains at 23 with 600 hours of total time and multiple cases of pilots paying for their type ratings.

Stay away from it, it is very depressing.
Many good points here.

Flyby1206,

I think you're off track WRT unions. It's sad to see people let their past experiences with ALPA National cloud the services their local councils provided them. Fact is this, you can't compare corporate America jobs with airline pilots. Many have already provided many examples as to why it wouldn't work, & my biggest is safety. LuvJockey already hit on it, but too many butt kissers would be willing to compromise safety to make it to the top.
Reply
Old 08-02-2011 | 06:23 AM
  #25  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
What you are describing can already be seen...in the military flying ops.
Semi-correct. If you want a 30 year military career and make it to the "stars" you have to be a proficient brown noser. However the comment about flying is off base.

The quickest way to ensure you will never make it past O-4 is to keep opting for flying billets. Pass up those cherry staff jobs and you're done. If your goal in the military is to get flight training and enough hours for an airline job (as mine was), find the billets that offer the most flying.

But, understand that you're giving up being an Admiral if you do that.
Reply
Old 08-02-2011 | 06:35 AM
  #26  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Agreed... BUT, how would you suggest to do advancement?
Like the rest of the business world. Be a better "team player" and "yes" man/woman. Please your boss and that means be a cheaper pilot.

Sooo........use less fuel then your counterparts by taking less and flying shorter routes closer to or thru storms. Don't make too much of an issue about MTX issues as that costs money too. Work more days or be willing......no eager, to fly at short notice and any time and for christ's sake don't ever call in sick.........even if you are.

Since you are employed at will and can be terminated at any time, for any reason (or no reason at all), you cannot afford to make an error, cause any problems (whether real or just perceived that way by a boss that doesn't care for you) or become a burden.

See...........it's easy.
Reply
Old 08-02-2011 | 06:41 AM
  #27  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

Originally Posted by Fishfreighter
Semi-correct. If you want a 30 year military career and make it to the "stars" you have to be a proficient brown noser. However the comment about flying is off base.

The quickest way to ensure you will never make it past O-4 is to keep opting for flying billets. Pass up those cherry staff jobs and you're done. If your goal in the military is to get flight training and enough hours for an airline job (as mine was), find the billets that offer the most flying.

But, understand that you're giving up being an Admiral if you do that.

I fully understand that, I was a military guy once too. My point was, without a seniority number it becomes a Suck Up to Move Up organization, like others above have pointed out, rife with political back-stabbing to get ahead.

A long time ago, when I was in the Air Guard, and also had my airline job, I was at a drill weekend, trying to convince one of my full-timer buddies that he should also get out and get an airline job. He said he didn't want to "start at the bottom and be a Flight Engineer (everyone's first seat back then, at every major, 1985 era).

Then we started talking about how a Seniority List works, in terms of who gets to upgrade to F/O and Capt. He asked, "You mean if some guy is a complete slacker, but he's senior to a hard working guy, the slacker gets to upgrade FIRST??"

I said, "Yup, but that's really the beauty of the system, you don't have to kiss anyone's arse to move up. No matter how good, or how bad you are, when your number comes up, you upgrade. Of course if you really are an idiot they can flunk you at your sim check and send you back to the panel."

Long story short, he stayed in his full time job at the Air Guard, made Col. before he got out.

I have always thought the biggest disincentive to making the Military a life long career, is exactly what you pointed out above. To move up above O4, you have to give up flying and start taking desk jobs.

I only took up flying to get out of doing a desk job in the first place!

Some people love to fly, some people like to sit behind a desk and talk on a phone all day.

Oh, and "...the world needs ditch diggers too Danny."
Reply
Old 08-02-2011 | 07:06 AM
  #28  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,018
Likes: 26
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Many good points here.

Flyby1206,

I think you're off track WRT unions. It's sad to see people let their past experiences with ALPA National cloud the services their local councils provided them. Fact is this, you can't compare corporate America jobs with airline pilots. Many have already provided many examples as to why it wouldn't work, & my biggest is safety. LuvJockey already hit on it, but too many butt kissers would be willing to compromise safety to make it to the top.
I agree that I definitely skew towards the anti-ALPA side, but we all have biases. I havent been treated particularly poorly at previous ALPA carriers, but I just cannot endorse the inefficiencies and lack of innovation they bring with them.

It is frustrating to be in an industry that used to be the leading edge of technology and innovation, but has since become the laggard. It isnt completely the fault of unions, the government plays a much larger role in the crippling of the business. I just think there is a huge potential for global growth in aviation, and we (as the USA) could really lead the way if we got our $hit together.
Reply
Old 08-02-2011 | 07:10 AM
  #29  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
I agree that I definitely skew towards the anti-ALPA side, but we all have biases. I havent been treated particularly poorly at previous ALPA carriers, but I just cannot endorse the inefficiencies and lack of innovation they bring with them.

It is frustrating to be in an industry that used to be the leading edge of technology and innovation, but has since become the laggard. It isnt completely the fault of unions, the government plays a much larger role in the crippling of the business. I just think there is a huge potential for global growth in aviation, and we (as the USA) could really lead the way if we got our $hit together.
Agreed. ALPA National is terribly bloated, & our government can't even agree on how to keep our Nation from defaulting on it's own loans. This country is falling behind in so many categories. It's frustrating & sad.
Reply
Old 08-02-2011 | 07:23 AM
  #30  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Agreed. ALPA National is terribly bloated
Kinda have to disagree there. When they lost USAir dues, they had to do some rather draconian staff cuts.

Of course, there's always more that could be done...as with government spending.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
forgot to bid
Major
242
05-27-2009 11:26 AM
hiplainsdrifter
Major
34
04-29-2009 06:13 PM
mike734
Major
15
09-17-2007 12:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices