Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta has a TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-2012 | 07:05 AM
  #291  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
There is nothing new here. You know that. These arguments have been going on since Wilbur and Orvil. Max is exactly the demographic that I was talking about. I will fight to the death to protect his right to stay around.. and fly the contract to the best of his advantage...
My impression is there are fair number of APC regulars who weren't around to go through the bankruptcy process and loss of pensions.

I think there are some significant differences with respect to the pension losses suffered by different demographic groups. I'll try and briefly explain them.

Once the PBGC took over the DB plan they had to determine essentially who gets what and they divided the entire group into different priority categories. One's priority category (PC), in addition to their earnings history, etc determined how much they got.

If you were 53 or older on the date of plan termination you were PC-3. If you were younger than that you were PC-4. Pilots in the PC-3 category received a very significantly higher retirement benefit than PC-4 pilots.

Then all pilots "shared" in the $2.1B pre-petition bankruptcy claim and the $550M note. DALPA divided that amongst all the pilots according to a methodology they devised. Their methods gave greater significantly greater amounts to the older pilots.

Then we add in the age 65 rule change. Pilots who were PC-3 actually got something of a windfall as they get a greater retirement benefit from the PBGC, they got a bunch more money from the claim and note, they are very senior and now got to fly to 65.

They are NOT "Dead Zoners".

That term applies to guys like our beloved T Square. He was younger than 53, so he is a PC-3 guy, he also got less money from the claim and note. And, while many say begrudgingly "Yeah, but he can fly to 65", he can, but even doing so, he will not be able to make up for what was taken.

There's another little detail about "Letter 51" that many people have forgotten. Pre-bankruptcy (I believe Letter 46) the pension plan was frozen. Delta then converted from a defined benefit plan to a defined contribution plan.

DALPA correctly recognized that change would effect individual pilots retirements vastly differently. They knew the pretty senior PC-3 guys retirement benefits would be in good shape and those just shy of the PC-3 cutoff would be hammered. So the "new" DC plan had different retirement contribution percentages to make up for that. There was a matrix and (IIRC) those percentages varied between 3% and 17%. Letter 51 did away with those differences and paid everyone the same. Effectively (another) windfall for the PC-3 guys and (yet another) slam for the "Dead Zoners".

All of this is from memory so I suspect (and hope) someone will correct any errors...
Old 05-17-2012 | 07:06 AM
  #292  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Scambo has kind of a bag man ring though... Maybe you should reconsider.
Dude!

I have the criminal mind, just not a malfunctioning super ego.
Old 05-17-2012 | 07:09 AM
  #293  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Brocc15
I was absolutely disgusted when I read the post basically saying we should be ok with selling scope for a little bit of pay because he is only a couple years from retirement so he needs the couple extra bucks. I'm so glad so many of you responded in ways I could not quite articulate without going on a rant! Wow that was disgusting. At least I am pretty confident that is not the majority of our pilot group!

A couple extra bucks for selling scope would result in industry wide stagnation, meaning lower pay over time and worse QOL for ALL, but maybe the very very top. I would definitely vote no to the 12% (rumored overall increase by Jan 1) if it would mean everyone being stagnated even more in their careers. Of course this is all speculation so we will see what the actual contract says if it passes the MEC

Has anyone heard any rumors about the on-going MEC deliberations?
Most of the senior (old) guy's I fly with understand the importance of scope relief. We will see little gain from this contract in the short time we are here.
It's the same argument about leaving the national debt to our children. It needs to be fixed. I know I will vote on this TA as if MY son/daughter was a new hire at DELTA AIR LINES
Old 05-17-2012 | 07:25 AM
  #294  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
The whole leak this is so illogical that I have a hard time with it too.

My main premise is: Why would we extend our contract.

To back this up, I have to ask some questions. These are from a "labor" perspective.

1. What interest do we have in quickening the shrinkage of 50 seaters?

2. Why would we even consider exchanging 50's for 76's on an ASM neutral basis?

3. How would an unchanged DCI ASM really translate to increase mainline block hours?

4. How would more 76 seaters, with the economic efficiency of mainline jets negatively impact our future bargaining leverage?

5. Is there ANY upside to allowing the further outsourcing of 76 seat flying?

6. Who gains from increasing 76 seaters? Who loses?

Gloopy?

George?

ACL?
Old 05-17-2012 | 07:28 AM
  #295  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: A big one that looks like a little one
Default

Just a thought. Delta Air Lines, Delta Shuttle, and Delta Express have all been painted on the side of airplanes flown by "mainline" pilots. If EB was talking about up gauging "Delta Connection" flying he may very well be talking about it as a brand, not as "Pinnacle and Skywest will do great at this". At that level of the company, to the executives and their talking points, it's really all the same. I don't know what it says on the side of my airplane but I'd feel awfully good to fly an airplane that said Delta Connection on the side and "Operated by Delta Air Lines" by the door.
Old 05-17-2012 | 07:36 AM
  #296  
TenYearsGone's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 0
From: 7ERB
Default

Delta will pair down flying for 2012.
I guess we are right sizing for another synergistic event

TEN
Old 05-17-2012 | 07:40 AM
  #297  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Horse hockey. It didn't "stop" your career. It delayed it. You have the same additional five years added to the end of your career as he did. And... your end years will be at bigger money than his.
It's hard to start a family at the beginning of your career bringing in $1500 a month flying a jet, just to hope you could pay for it decades down the road.
Old 05-17-2012 | 07:49 AM
  #298  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by nwa757
It's hard to start a family at the beginning of your career bringing in $1500 a month flying a jet, just to hope you could pay for it decades down the road.
No doubt. It's also hard to have planned on a retirement to be there only to have it taken away right before the time for that retirement to take place. Like I said before, we all have our crosses to bear.

Of course this is why I want to see more rational payscales that take time/value of money into consideration.. but I won't start THAT again... I don't want Scambo any more angry at me than he already is..
Old 05-17-2012 | 07:50 AM
  #299  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
No doubt. It's also hard to have planned on a retirement to be there only to have it taken away right before the time for that retirement to take place. Like I said before, we all have our crosses to bear.

Of course this is why I want to see more rational payscales that take time/value of money into consideration.. but I won't start THAT again... I don't want Scambo any more angry at me than he already is..

I'm glad you like your kneecaps.
Old 05-17-2012 | 07:51 AM
  #300  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by SailorJerry
Just a thought. Delta Air Lines, Delta Shuttle, and Delta Express have all been painted on the side of airplanes flown by "mainline" pilots. If EB was talking about up gauging "Delta Connection" flying he may very well be talking about it as a brand, not as "Pinnacle and Skywest will do great at this". At that level of the company, to the executives and their talking points, it's really all the same. I don't know what it says on the side of my airplane but I'd feel awfully good to fly an airplane that said Delta Connection on the side and "Operated by Delta Air Lines" by the door.

IF this was the case, bring the TA.

Its not though.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
Sir James
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 06:28 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices