![]() |
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1205276)
I see you have 38 posts. Do you work for ALPA?
|
Originally Posted by ReasonableMan
(Post 1205297)
No I don't. I'm just someone who knows a good deal when I see it because i'm able to get past my initial disappointment and I have actually read throughout the TA and asked my reps questions and gotten an understanding of this very complex document. I'm no longer focusing on just one aspect of the TA. It's not the best deal by any stretch of the imagination however, it's a very good deal considering the economic environment we are in, what our counterparts at other major carriers are receiving now (the NMB WILL take this into consideration), and the expansion of mainline and simultaneous and significant overall reduction in DCI. Although I can't say for certain, I am confident that turning this thing down will not work out well for us and we will be kicking ourselves in the butt for years to come because of all of the mainline lift we will lose behind that bad decision. We are still losing money behind the initial rejection of the JCBA. Who's bright idea was that. It is my personal observation that RA is no pushover and is able to make a BUSINESS decision. Can we? It's not about fear, but a BUSINESS decision.
|
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1205276)
I see you have 38 posts. Do you work for ALPA?
|
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1205303)
If not, then this forum loses credibility.
Coffee spat on monitors.... chairs turned over... I think I even strained a chest muscle.. Forum.... credibility... Funny funny stuff Elvis... Thank you very much... |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1205321)
That right there is hands down the funniest thing ever written on the interwebs... Reminds me of the Monty Python "funniest joke" skit. It cant be viewed all at once or death will ensue.
Coffee spat on monitors.... chairs turned over... I think I even strained a chest muscle.. Forum.... credibility... Funny funny stuff Elvis... Thank you very much... Oh, and let that be a lesson to you T, don't drink and read this forum! ;) |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1205321)
That right there is hands down the funniest thing ever written on the interwebs... Reminds me of the Monty Python "funniest joke" skit. It cant be viewed all at once or death will ensue.
Coffee spat on monitors.... chairs turned over... I think I even strained a chest muscle.. Forum.... credibility... Funny funny stuff Elvis... Thank you very much... |
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1205325)
Why do you bother, T? Are you dishonest in what you post? Seriously?
Oh, and let that be a lesson to you T, don't drink and read this forum! ;) |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1205347)
Awwww you know I'm just messing with ya....
"Elvis" was actually my Air Force nickname/callsign. I kind of look at this as chatting in the crew van or at dinner with other crews. ------- Word of the day regarding the TA: "apoplectic". Just came up on my iPad from dictionary.com and it seems to apply. |
Originally Posted by ReasonableMan
(Post 1205208)
This TA will not reduce the need for as many reserve pilots and her's why:
The increase to max reserve resolves the situation in a category with long trips in which a reserve pilot with, for example, 30 hours for the month cannot be assigned even a single rotation without taking him/her above the ALV, which is currently max reserve. The staffing formula is designed to require enough reserve pilots to cover about 60 hours of flying each. In any rolling 12-month period, if the average reserve pilot flies less than 60 hours, the staffing formula requires incrementally fewer reserve pilots in succeeding months. If, on the other hand, the average reserve pilot flies more than 60 hours, the formula requires incrementally more reserve pilots. The more reserve pilots fly, the more reserve pilots are required. In other words, if the increase to max reserve causes reserve pilots to fly more, the staffing formula will in turn require more reserve pilots, which will subsequently reduce the aver- age flown by reserves. |
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1205353)
T, I think you probably ROFLYFAO more than anybody on here! I've never done that, but I have small children in the house.
"Elvis" was actually my Air Force nickname/callsign. I kind of look at this as chatting in the crew van or at dinner with other crews. ------- Word of the day regarding the TA: "apoplectic". Just came up on my iPad from dictionary.com and it seems to apply. And FWIW, I view these forums as nothing more than a place to chat too... other than that, I place no real credibility for hidden bits of unknown information in any of these forums. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:21 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands