|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1204651)
We must have never met. :)
I got to fly the 767 about once every 3 months with less frequency than that as we "synergized." I nearly always said "757 and 767." More on topic, in this TA there is zero reason why the MD-88, A320, and 737 pay shouldn't be equalized into a single band. The 737-900 should be increased to equal the 757, IMO... The 747-400 should have been bumped up a few bucks higher than the 777, as well. You just said that last one just to **** me off, didn't you? |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1204651)
We must have never met. :)
I got to fly the 767 about once every 3 months with less frequency than that as we "synergized." I nearly always said "757 and 767." More on topic, in this TA there is zero reason why the MD-88, A320, and 737 pay shouldn't be equalized into a single band. The 737-900 should be increased to equal the 757, IMO... The 747-400 should have been bumped up a few bucks higher than the 777, as well. Carl |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1204870)
You just said that last one just to **** me off, didn't you?
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1204521)
You know what else that merger will give them? Hundreds MORE jumbo RJs then our proposed TA will give us.
APA's proposal is 308 51-88 seat jets PLUS 352 70 seat jets. That's APA's proposal! That's supposed to be the good one!!! :eek: |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1205006)
APA's proposal or USAir management's proposal to APA?
|
Originally Posted by DAL73n
(Post 1204830)
Oh, let's not forget the huge pay DECREASE with all of the retired 767 domestic and 757 pilots displaced to the new 737-900 (which the company has already admitted are REPLACEMENT A/C and not GROWTH). Nobody seems to be factoring in the lower pay of the 737-900.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1205008)
APA's proposal.
|
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1205011)
Well then maybe other things will transpire to take care of that. If they go for that they have no business being in business.
I haven't seen the specific wording or restrictions on them, though. |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1205008)
APA's proposal to UsAir.
Anything is possible, but I do not see the judge being the first to throw an agreement out, especially when AMR has until Sept 29th before they lose exclusivity. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1205010)
Yeah why even bother with the 50 cents/hr over regular 737 pay? Seems like it would cost more to keep up with the split among a common fleet than it would to just raise the entire fleet to it.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:46 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands