Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
C54 Vice Chair Perspective >

C54 Vice Chair Perspective

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

C54 Vice Chair Perspective

Old 05-31-2012, 01:30 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jack Bauer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
But, once again it is alleged a very tight team negotiated what they believe is best, reliant on non disclosed information, with a "fait accompli" style presentation to our MEC. My "feelings" about this process are mixed. Certainly our NC cut to the chase, perhaps by going beyond their authority ... at the same time, management had an Exec. VP at the table wheeling and dealing as well. Neither side approached this as they would / will traditional Section 6.
All bad things and improper in my opinion. They got hustled by an Exec VP (S.D.?) under the pressure cooker of "must get this done quickly....fleeting opportunity". Has happened to the best of us at some point in our lives at the electronics store. There is a reason for checks and balances when bargaining for peoples livelihoods.

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
I also differ with Mr. Aaron on the concept of external economic review. Generally, if paid by ALPA, the consultant will agree with ALPA. It is likely management would object to a third party coming in to review sensitive information and that in and of itself might be a deal breaker. Finally, but most importantly, there are not going to be any outside consultants who know Delta better than the experts Delta pilots have had working on the effort nearly full time (as long as I've been here).
I disagree on most of these points. Contrary to what you say, using our own guys creates even more group think. Multiple outside opinions should have been used with well defined criteria to prevent assimilation.

By the way, if Delta objects then this should be a deal breaker for us. Management cant hold all the cards in this game of poker....It is quite easy for them to present their case knowing the big picture while we become pawns to their Kings. C H E C K M A T E !
Jack Bauer is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 01:34 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jack Bauer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
You know my goal is to see all Delta flying performed by Delta pilots. I do not see the TA as a "pay for scope trade" deal. DCI shrinks and more flying is returned to mainline. My benchmark is unity.

If we continue down the road into traditional Section 6 I think our Section 1 result will not be as good as we see today.
Bucking, sometimes you come of as a stroke of genius. Today not so much. Your desire to play both sides as the "fair and balanced ambassador" sometimes causes you to take position greatly at odds with other things you have brilliantly pointed out at the peril of your credibility.
Jack Bauer is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 01:38 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jack Bauer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop View Post
Give it up Bar. Scope is my number issue and I have been called a "Spin Meister" for basically saying I am glad we held the line at 76 seats and for not shouting "No More RJ's " from the rooftops.

Some guys are more interested in emotion then logic.

Scoop
Adding more permanent 90 seat jets (outfitted with 76 seats and first class) is not holding the line and you therefore are a spin meister sir. This guy agrees....

Jack Bauer is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 01:54 PM
  #24  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Bauer View Post
Bucking, sometimes you come of as a stroke of genius. Today not so much. Your desire to play both sides as the "fair and balanced ambassador" sometimes causes you to take position greatly at odds with other things you have brilliantly pointed out at the peril of your credibility.
The same was written about Thomas Jefferson, who was a more real to life revolutionary figure than the alcoholic Australian paid to hold the flag in your photo.



Jefferson had argued against Federal power and national debt, but, he authorized the Louisiana purchase. It was probably unconstitutional, and it resolved foreign debt while committing the US to foreign debt. He did it to avoid war and because he knew a good deal when he saw one. The residents of Arkansas, Missouri, Iowa, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Nebraska; parts of Minnesota that were west of the Mississippi River; most of North Dakota; nearly all of South Dakota; northeastern New Mexico; northern Texas; the portions of Montana, Wyoming, and Colorado east of the Continental Divide; and Louisiana west of the Mississippi River, including the city of New Orleans are all happy not to be in greater Quebec.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 05-31-2012 at 02:08 PM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 02:10 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Just happy to be here Boss!
Posts: 200
Default

I agree the process issues are troubling and need to be addressed in the very near future; however, that is a separate matter than the TA before us.
I disagree that the letter is a well written or a well thought out argument. His emotion and anger ooze out after just a couple of paragraphs. Most of the premises to support his argument are mere suppositions, not verifiable data or facts. Using a series of questions to prop up your position is not an effective technique. It only invites more speculation.

I suspect this letter will be praised by the hardcore no voters, ridiculed by the solid yes votes and just dismissed by those on the fence...so in the end, it is no help.
ITSALLGOOD is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 02:13 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy View Post
FWIW, Art is probably the smartest (although brilliant is a better adjective) guy on the MEC, and that's no BS.

If he says no, then there is no doubt that the TA is a steaming pile.

But then again, you don't have to be that smart to see that, just unindoctrinated and not living in fear of your own shadow.

Nu

Agreed. If he were our MEC Chairman, I am certain no one would be even talking about DPA.

We would be moving thoughtfully toward the right TA for us.
TheManager is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 02:13 PM
  #27  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue24 View Post
Delta’s CEO is on the Federal Reserve in Atlanta, and he has a far better understanding of the money supply and monetary policy than our expanded negotiating team does. He even stated (in a line check meeting) that he expected inflation to “hit like a ton of bricks.”

Did you really just say you are OK with the Admin and NC going around the MEC?
FWIW
If you can get a new mortgage or refinance an existing one, interest rates have fallen to incredible new lows.
Interest on a 15-year loan has dropped below 3 percent for the first time ever, according to data from Freddie Mac.
The average rate on the 30-year loan fell to 3.75 percent. That's down from 3.78 percent last week and the lowest since long-term mortgages began in the 1950s.
The 15-year mortgage rate is down to 2.97 percent this week from 3.04 percent last week. The 15-year loan is often used for refinancing, that is if you can get the bank to call you back and then meet the requirements.
If the economy doesn't fall apart in other ways, these low rates may help the housing market as we are now in the buying season.
That's today's news ...
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 02:13 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jack Bauer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Default





Drunk or not everybody has their good days and bad.

I know you are conflicted. Just don't drink too much off the Koolaid producing ALPA teets. Let me rephrase that....be very carefully about being sucked into the idea that a very few should rule and decide for the masses......

Jack Bauer is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 02:18 PM
  #29  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager View Post
Agreed. If he were our MEC Chairman, I am certain no one would be even talking about DPA.

We would be moving thoughtfully toward the right TA for us.
If wishes were fishes, we'd all be fed.

If frog's had wings, they wouldn't bump their butts on the ground

If a Chicken sits on an egg and hatches a chick, why can't a **** sit on a contract and hatch a TA?
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 05-31-2012, 02:21 PM
  #30  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by ITSALLGOOD View Post
I agree the process issues are troubling and need to be addressed in the very near future; however, that is a separate matter than the TA before us.
I disagree that the letter is a well written or a well thought out argument. His emotion and anger ooze out after just a couple of paragraphs. Most of the premises to support his argument are mere suppositions, not verifiable data or facts. Using a series of questions to prop up your position is not an effective technique. It only invites more speculation.

I suspect this letter will be praised by the hardcore no voters, ridiculed by the solid yes votes and just dismissed by those on the fence...so in the end, it is no help.

I want to be a middle of the road guy and be able to objectively see both sides of an arguement. I really do. Really!

That said, how would this TA get a "solid yes voter?"

I can understand a weak yes, or a weak no, or a strong no. There is nothing in the TA that makes me let out a gasp and say YEEESSS!

What is a solid yes voter?
scambo1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
flywithjohn
Hangar Talk
4
10-24-2011 04:57 PM
sl0wr0ll3r
United
114
11-22-2010 03:40 PM
SkyHigh
Hangar Talk
15
04-15-2009 06:07 AM
Diver Driver
Regional
0
01-29-2008 02:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices