DL/UA/AA - Large RJ fleet comparison
#122
I will try to get you to stick to one point and one point only. You claimed definitively that B-717's were replacement aircraft.
...Surely, if you can state without condition that they are replacement aircraft, you have some basis for that statement, or are you just creating more random words?
...Surely, if you can state without condition that they are replacement aircraft, you have some basis for that statement, or are you just creating more random words?
Now look at my actual posts on the subject:
Because these new aircraft are highly likely to be 100% replacement aircraft...
...It's nothing more than a promise to bring aboard some leased 717's and says NOTHING about whether current mainline aircraft will be reitred when the 717's arrive....
...Could be hundreds, could be none depending upon whether the company uses them as growth aircraft or replacement aircraft.
...It's nothing more than a promise to bring aboard some leased 717's and says NOTHING about whether current mainline aircraft will be reitred when the 717's arrive....
...Could be hundreds, could be none depending upon whether the company uses them as growth aircraft or replacement aircraft.
The only thing I'm asking of you is to stop lying. It's unbecoming. You can try to rail against me for things I've never said, but it doesn't absolve you of lying. Only an apology can do that. But I guess being an MEC bureaucraft means never having to say you're sorry.
Carl
#123
Carl
#124
Do your own homework. You will learn more. It's all right there and very clear once you read it. I am not going to debate this again. Besides, my mom is having surgery in the morning and I do not have time to do this now...
#125
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
This is why it's so difficult to discuss anything with you alfaromeo. Look again at what you've written above.
Now look at my actual posts on the subject:
When did I EVER state definitively, or state without condition? I've done no such thing. I've said just the opposite. I've said it's unknowable unless you're a member of the ELT, and even they know it could change day by day.
The only thing I'm asking of you is to stop lying. It's unbecoming. You can try to rail against me for things I've never said, but it doesn't absolve you of lying. Only an apology can do that. But I guess being an MEC bureaucraft means never having to say you're sorry.
Carl
Now look at my actual posts on the subject:
When did I EVER state definitively, or state without condition? I've done no such thing. I've said just the opposite. I've said it's unknowable unless you're a member of the ELT, and even they know it could change day by day.
The only thing I'm asking of you is to stop lying. It's unbecoming. You can try to rail against me for things I've never said, but it doesn't absolve you of lying. Only an apology can do that. But I guess being an MEC bureaucraft means never having to say you're sorry.
Carl
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post