![]() |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1213044)
What I bolded above just tickles me given alfaromeo's previous post in another thread:
"We have an agreement that will add 1,000 new mainline jobs, but somehow that is a bad thing. Go figure." I've asked alfaromeo to show us numerous times where this claim exists in the TA. But as expected, only the sound of crickets. Don't you just hate shabby analysis and outright fabrications? :rolleyes: Carl Carl, things keep changing. Back in April of this year (when the company had no idea that they might be able to acquire 717s from SWA :rolleyes:) we were told hiring in mid to late 2013. Then the TA dropped. No mention of a change in the hiring plan so still mad to late 2013. Then the rumors of 717s come with pilots was met with a late memo saying not true, but still no mention of a change in hiring. Then people question whether the 717s are just replacement aircraft and now we may, may, have to hire in 2012 instead of mid to late 2013. The word pandering comes to mind since it was on the eve of the vote. And now all of a sudden, those 739s are no longer 1:1 replacements as has been said since they were ordered. And we may exercise options for 30 more 739s and make those all growth. In the batters box is probably the rumored 773 order, 24 more 717s and we'll upgrade the entire fleet of MD88s and 90s with new cockpits. They ain't stupid and neither are we. If the contract doesn't say it, it doesn't have to happen. |
BTW, 773 orders, 24 more 717s and cockpit upgrades for the MD fleet are rumors I absolutely believe.
Problem is, it'd be 773s to replace 744s, 24 717s to bring the fleet to 112 to help replace 117 MD88s and the MD90 gets a cockpit upgrade. Staffing, ASM and cost neutral. |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1213044)
What I bolded above just tickles me given alfaromeo's previous post in another thread:
"We have an agreement that will add 1,000 new mainline jobs, but somehow that is a bad thing. Go figure." I've asked alfaromeo to show us numerous times where this claim exists in the TA. But as expected, only the sound of crickets. Don't you just hate shabby analysis and outright fabrications? :rolleyes: Carl |
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1213074)
Okay, that's easy, 30 MD-90's replace 21 DC-9's and then add 88 717's. That's 1,000 right there. Any other questions?
We have an agreement that will add 1,000 new mainline jobs, but somehow that is a bad thing. Go figure. Carl |
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1213074)
Okay, that's easy, 30 MD-90's replace 21 DC-9's and then add 88 717's. That's 1,000 right there. Any other questions?
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1213055)
BTW, 773 orders, 24 more 717s and cockpit upgrades for the MD fleet are rumors I absolutely believe.
Problem is, it'd be 773s to replace 744s, 24 717s to bring the fleet to 112 to help replace 117 MD88s and the MD90 gets a cockpit upgrade. Staffing, ASM and cost neutral. |
Originally Posted by Eric Stratton
(Post 1213082)
Aren't they saying that you're currently over staffed and didn't some work rule changes cause extra staffing as well?
|
Bill- there are several 767s in the desert that had a million dollars of AVOD and interior upgrades installed in them.
None of what you typed is any sort of a guarantee... it's wishful thinking at best. |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1213080)
OK great. Where in the TA does it say Delta is obligated by our TA to acquire 30 MD-90's and/or 88 717's? Because remember you said:
We have an agreement that will add 1,000 new mainline jobs, but somehow that is a bad thing. Go figure. Carl |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1213090)
Bill- there are several 767s in the desert that had a million dollars of AVOD and interior upgrades installed in them.
None of what you typed is any sort of a guarantee... it's wishful thinking at best. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:04 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands