![]() |
Nevermind......
|
Deleted !!
|
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1213080)
OK great. Where in the TA does it say Delta is obligated by our TA to acquire 30 MD-90's and/or 88 717's? Because remember you said:
We have an agreement that will add 1,000 new mainline jobs, but somehow that is a bad thing. Go figure. Carl |
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1213113)
The agreement removes a massive amount of DCI capacity that allows these aircraft to be added. The 88 717's are mandated by the TA. Got it yet?
|
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 1213093)
Just like you thinking management will come back with more, or soon. Wishful thinking, at best. A bird in the hand is worth 19.7% and 200 fewer 50 seaters. All you got is.....a hunch. And they don't get any 76 seaters without 88 717s. It's in there, take a look.
I found it in the NNP, but no such luck in the TA. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1213116)
And how many MD-88s are mandated to remain in the fleet?
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1213118)
annnd there's the crux. Sure would have been nice if there wasn't so much downflux allowed in the ratio...
|
Originally Posted by Ferd149
(Post 1213098)
Deleted !!
My point was that basing their longevity on the fact that mgmt installed AVOD and other mods is proven to be a wildly unreliable source. Enjoy your evening! |
under construction....
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1213121)
What I stated had nothing to do with a swipe at the longevity of the whales. :) Personally, I think they are around to stay because they are a great machine.
My point was that basing their longevity on the fact that mgmt installed AVOD and other mods is proven to be a wildly unreliable source. Enjoy your evening! I hate this deviation from deadhead stuff.....sure hope it states in the TA:eek: PS. I met sinca3 today commuting in...what a good $hit!! Ferd. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:57 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands