Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

CNN Breaking News!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2012, 05:29 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Capt
Posts: 2,041
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg View Post
Pester? This is an anonymous board with opinions and rumors. Looks like you can't handle either. Face it, you have a HUNCH we can do better, nothing more. Good luck with that, hopefully most pilots out there are smarter than that.
You guys must be getting worried about the results. A little early peek maybe?
boog123 is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 05:29 PM
  #52  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by texavia View Post
Truly Classic.
Don't hate the playa, hate the GAME.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 05:32 PM
  #53  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by boog123 View Post
You guys must be getting worried about the results. A little early peek maybe?
You guys? I am not an ALPA rep or work for them at all. I threw in a DPA card awhile back actually. I just think this TA is a good deal right now, and I am giving my opinion on things that some on here aren't really thinking about, like the economy around the World and troubles in our own industry. Let me guess, you are a part of the vocal minority? Probably.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 05:35 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg View Post
Pester? This is an anonymous board with opinions and rumors. Looks like you can't handle either. Face it, you have a HUNCH we can do better, nothing more. Good luck with that, hopefully most pilots out there are smarter than that.
Awwww bless your precious heart.
DeadHead is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 05:42 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg View Post
Pester? This is an anonymous board with opinions and rumors. Looks like you can't handle either. Face it, you have a HUNCH we can do better, nothing more. Good luck with that, hopefully most pilots out there are smarter than that.
Are you saying you KNOW we can't do better?
newKnow is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 05:42 PM
  #56  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead View Post
Awwww bless your precious heart.
Back atcha!
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 05:58 PM
  #57  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
Are you saying you KNOW we can't do better?
So, you're willing to gamble that we can? You are saying that all of the professional negotiators, all of the people involved in the process, that were there, besides our own pilot negotiators, are WRONG? That's what you are saying, you don't believe any of them, right?

I think there is a chance we could get more, but a small chance. I think that chance is a lot like the last time we negotiated, in the JCBA. Like that one, I think we would get less. It's always a gamble, but to think that the ALPA people working on this took the first offer on the first day is ridiculous.

I was mad myself a month ago, thinking we would get more and we deserved more, especially when I first saw the TA. Then, I calmed down and actually looked around me, asked some questions, and realized that this was a 3 year contract, and it could be just an extension. It might have been lacking a bit, but overall it was good, and it builds on what we want to do, with only 3 years in duration. I am not willing to gamble that away on a hunch that maybe we could get more. I think our management team is smarter than that, and they would have that "plan B" that some are saying, including the negotiators. If you want to gamble away a good deal (not great), during these yet again uncertain times economically around the World, then do it. I won't.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 06:17 PM
  #58  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg View Post
So, you're willing to gamble that we can? You are saying that all of the professional negotiators, all of the people involved in the process, that were there, besides our own pilot negotiators, are WRONG? That's what you are saying, you don't believe any of them, right?
Whether they were right or wrong is immaterial Bill. ALL of those people you list work FOR us. It is OUR opinion that matters...NOT THEIRS. That's our union's structure...bottom-up. My reps have clearly stated that the process was subverted and the TA did not meet what the pilots stated they wanted in both scope and pay. I don't know why the MEC admins and the NC did what they did, but they are NOT the bosses in this process ... WE ARE.

If we as the bosses of this union (through our elected local reps) think it's wrong, then it IS wrong. The opinions of the professional negotiators, the NC and the MEC admins are fine, but they aren't nearly as important as the opinion of the line pilots who ostensibly run things. Mr. O'Malley can minimize the pilots' survey results by stating: "the pilots wishes in that survey are out of context", but I believe he does so at his peril. He would NEVER have made such a statement prior to the survey being sent out. In fact he said just the opposite. But when the results came in stronger than he hoped, now our wishes are out of context.

Again, they all have a right to their opinions, but they aren't the bosses.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 06:24 PM
  #59  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Whether they were right or wrong is immaterial Bill. ALL of those people you list work FOR us. It is OUR opinion that matters...NOT THEIRS. That's our union's structure...bottom-up. My reps have clearly stated that the process was subverted and the TA did not meet what the pilots stated they wanted in both scope and pay. I don't know why the MEC admins and the NC did what they did, but they are NOT the bosses in this process ... WE ARE.

If we as the bosses of this union (through our elected local reps) think it's wrong, then it IS wrong. The opinions of the professional negotiators, the NC and the MEC admins are fine, but they aren't nearly as important as the opinion of the line pilots who ostensibly run things. Mr. O'Malley can minimize the pilots' survey results by stating: "the pilots wishes in that survey are out of context", but I believe he does so at his peril. He would NEVER have made such a statement prior to the survey being sent out. In fact he said just the opposite. But when the results came in stronger than he hoped, now our wishes are out of context.

Again, they all have a right to their opinions, but they aren't the bosses.

Carl
So, if you were on trial for something, and your lawyer thought you had better accept something because he knows the judge, knows the other lawyers, and was in the Judge's quarters listening to him speak, you would tell him to shove it if he gave you his own advice? I guess you would. I was angry like you before this TA, but then decided ALPA was involved in the process, knows what is "going on", and would try to get the best deal for us, since it affects them too. Their "sale" of this to you is what happened in the negotiating room, and they know what will happen next. If you don't believe them, then don't.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 06:25 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 758
Default

If you think the economy will nose dive, do you really want a TA that requires less pilots. Slowplay posted earlier that in the end the work rule changes will require 175 less pilots. This does not inlcude early outs because those guys would be retiring in a short time anyway. I don't care about getting a marginal raise if it means that we need less pilots. Heck we have already dropped by 400 pilots since the merger.
DLpilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stoki
Regional
11227
04-26-2017 08:03 AM
Squawk_5543
Hangar Talk
2
06-20-2008 07:13 AM
Deuce130
Military
29
06-15-2007 11:10 PM
2Lazy
Major
7
05-01-2007 10:12 AM
XtremeF150
Regional
67
04-19-2007 03:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices