Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta TA Passes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2012 | 09:25 AM
  #51  
TenYearsGone's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 0
From: 7ERB
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
You are a bitter irrational man. I will make $800 more next month than I would have had you won the day. We will be reducing the number of RJs, and you will soon have a 717 that you might be able to fly captain on for, which I might add, will pay more than a 747 at other airlines. It was a pure unemotional business decision.

As far as your testicular comment, that is the last kind of argument that one who has no argument can make. The DAL pilots won, despite your best efforts. Thank goodness.
Fair enough T,

I was AGAINST. Maybe I am delusional or misinformed (I went over and above with deciphering the TA, thus proud of my vote). I accept the fact that the majority of my peers accepted this TA. I will be ok with that decision and move on positively as a good little Delta employee. I dont think DPA is the answer to anything either.

My concern is still:

1) The exploitation of section 1. Whether it happens now or in 3 years. I have a strong gut feeling that the 76 seaters will eventually morph into 90 seaters. I dont think the 4-8-3-3 is worth the continual degradation of our careers.

2) My opinion is that 4-8-3-3 is going to be the new Delta standard. Whether you believe it or not. We just gave management a plethora of relief for "measly" pay. Basically, they know that the Delta pilots will never ask for anything more than COLA. What is that pay, when you factor in the cost of living and taxes? Is it worth the continual outsourcing of our careers? I guess to 62% of my co-workers, it is.

Respectfully and as a good team-member I will never say,"I told you so",

TEN
Reply
Old 07-01-2012 | 09:25 AM
  #52  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by fly2002
We leave ALPA eventually. It's mathematical certainty. ALPA is 38 airlines with only 2 majors represented. If only one more major airline leaves then CAPA will represent more airline pilots than ALPA. ALPA will represent all the regionals and CAPA will represent all the majors.

In hindsight, my oversimplification of the delta ta vote is that the average age of the delta pilots is around 53ish. The company knows this and threw some money towards them gaining the necessary votes. These guys aren't trying to gain or prove anything. They just want more money before they retire. From that standpoint the agreement is "good" to them. But simple logic would dictate that this type of contract cannot be repeated, although it has, because eventually we will be jobless.
This is just silly. I will bet you that when the application window opens again, there will be thousands of guys trying to come here... thousands. And I will also bet you that there will be many that will be coming from the other legacy carriers.. even some that are still on the property (not furloughed) but if you are right, and this place sucks so bad, there will be virtually zero applications. jobless...

And as a 51 year old, the main thing that sold me on this agreement was the scope win. There is NOTHING in THAT for me, but it was the right thing to do for the younger guys. The money was good, but not great, and the DC addition leaves a lot to be desired. So why don;t you back off throwing rocks at the old guys before you really know why they voted the way they did...
Reply
Old 07-01-2012 | 09:32 AM
  #53  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
Fair enough T,

I was AGAINST. Maybe I am delusional or misinformed (I went over and above with deciphering the TA, thus proud of my vote). I accept the fact that the majority of my peers accepted this TA. I will be ok with that decision and move on positively as a good little Delta employee. I dont think DPA is the answer to anything either.

My concern is still:

1) The exploitation of section 1. Whether it happens now or in 3 years. I have a strong gut feeling that the 76 seaters will eventually morph into 90 seaters. I dont think the 4-8-3-3 is worth the continual degradation of our careers.

2) My opinion is that 4-8-3-3 is going to be the new Delta standard. Whether you believe it or not. We just gave management a plethora of relief for "measly" pay. Basically, they know that the Delta pilots will never ask for anything more than COLA. What is that pay, when you factor in the cost of living and taxes? Is it worth the continual outsourcing of our careers? I guess to 62% of my co-workers, it is.

Respectfully and as a good team-member I will never say,"I told you so",

TEN
I get the angst. I do. It is scary, but I don't see 90 seaters at DCI because that flying currently does not exist there. I just don't see that happening. I can;t think of anyone that will vote for that.

As to the pay.. I think the 3,3 part will be modified before we ever get there because of further industry consolidation. That will open the contract again. But even if not, I would take 4/8.5/3/3 on the next contract in a heartbeat. But stay tuned. The problem is that we have no one to pattern off of, and I don't think anybody will pass us prior to that next consolidation event. THAT worries me a little. So what that leaves is the cherry picking of UPS and FedEx to pattern from. (SWA is not included in my thoughts here because I firmly believe they are gonna get a mediocre (even by some standards expressed HERE) contract..

Lastly. DPA is destructive. They serve zero beneficial purpose.

PS. You DO know that my argument was aimed at Bacon Bits and not you, right?
Reply
Old 07-01-2012 | 10:24 AM
  #54  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
Default

Originally Posted by TenYearsGone

Respectfully and as a good team-member I will never say,"I told you so",
I appreciate the sentiment, and although I think "yes" was the wrong path, I do respect that the majority of this (outrageously and irrationally risk-averse) pilot group has spoken. So be it.

However, if warranted, I will say "I told you so" as much as necessary to ensure we don't bend ourselves over like this ever again.
Reply
Old 07-01-2012 | 10:25 AM
  #55  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Lastly. DPA is destructive. They serve zero beneficial purpose.
"can you prove that?"

[that's my best johnso29 imitation]
Reply
Old 07-01-2012 | 10:26 AM
  #56  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by More Bacon
"can you prove that?"

[that's my best johnso29 imitation]
DPA provided nothing but division during Sec 6 and the TA ratification window. TC e-mailed a classless comparison of our TA to a forced abortion, then back pedalled like crazy.

Geez, can't let facts get in the way now can we?
Reply
Old 07-01-2012 | 10:26 AM
  #57  
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
Looking for a laugh
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mtbguy
Maybe in six months those that voted yes on it will look back and say to themselves, "that wasn't really that great a deal, was it".

My only hope for future is that DPA or some other group could replace ALPA.
Or, maybe in six momths those that voted no on it will look back and say to themselves, "that really was a good deal, thanks ALPA."

Either way, does it really matter? This PWA will never get to 2015. There will be a JBCA before then with whomever we next merge with.
Reply
Old 07-01-2012 | 10:40 AM
  #58  
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
Looking for a laugh
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by More Bacon
I appreciate the sentiment, and although I think "yes" was the wrong path, I do respect that the majority of this (outrageously and irrationally risk-averse) pilot group has spoken. So be it.
No you don't, or you never would have put the parentetical statement in. It is a back handed thinly veiled shot.

Originally Posted by More Bacon
However, if warranted, I will say "I told you so" as much as necessary to ensure we don't bend ourselves over like this ever again.
You do know that constant "I told you so" only diminishes your credibility and causes your target audience to discredit your message and tune you out.
Reply
Old 07-01-2012 | 11:31 AM
  #59  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
No you don't, or you never would have put the parentetical statement in. It is a back handed thinly veiled shot.


You do know that constant "I told you so" only diminishes your credibility and causes your target audience to discredit your message and tune you out.
Absolutely correct sir. Bacon's "credibility" (as I said before, he is simply a bitter irrational man) is suspect for precisely the reasons you mentioned.
Reply
Old 07-01-2012 | 11:47 AM
  #60  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by More Bacon
I appreciate the sentiment, and although I think "yes" was the wrong path, I do respect that the majority of this (outrageously and irrationally risk-averse) pilot group has spoken.
You are a DPA proponent, do you truly believe that holding a contemptuous attitude towards the pilots you want DPA to represent will garner support for your group among the pilots you hold in such low regard?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
Sir James
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 06:28 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices