Originally Posted by cactusmike
(Post 1275700)
Here are some of the crucial points she made:
'But being “bound” by the Transition Agreement has very little meaning in the context of the present case. It is undisputed that the Transition Agreement can be modified at any time “by written agreement of [USAPA] and the [US Airways].” (Doc. 156-3 at 38). Moreover, USAPA and US Airways are now engaged in negotiations for an entirely new collective bargaining agreement and there is no obvious impediment to USAPA and US Airways negotiating and agreeing upon any seniority regime they wish. As explained by the Ninth Circuit, “seniority rights are creations of the collective bargaining agreement, and so may be revised or abrogated by later negotiated changes in this agreement.” The whole thing really needs to be read to get the full view. My take on it she was saying: "USAPA, I think you are screwing the west pilots, but you have the law on your side. You might want to come up with a better case because even though you can do it, looks like you might have to answer to it again. US Airways, you're pretty much off the hook. You have to negotiate, but you don't have to say yes to just anything." |
Looks like everyone loses. Loses all the time and money they've dedicated to their respective causes and it seems further from being settled now. You're all at a legally determined stalemate.
USAPA is free to do as it chooses and all parties are free to sue if they feel wronged and all parties have pretty strong potential cases. Nobody is going to win this unless people work together and constructively reach a solution. Until that almost unimaginable event happens, all of you will continue to be working under the worst contract and lowest pay of all non-regional airline pilots. It really is unfortunate. |
Originally Posted by lolwut
(Post 1275695)
So did she just rule that USAPA is free to do a DOH list?
|
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 1275707)
No, that they are free to propose and negotiate any list they want, they just better have a good reason for it.
|
Originally Posted by cactusmike
(Post 1275710)
Good summary. The term she used is legitimate union purpose. We have in evidence from the Wake trial (Addington) what the purpose of USAPA is. Heck, all we have to do is show the UOM (union operating manual).
I think this would be a good time for both sides to step back, look at what has been lost and reconsider their positions. I have little hope of that happening. |
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 1275704)
"USAPA, I think you are screwing the west pilots, but you have the law on your side. You might want to come up with a better case because even though you can do it, looks like you might have to answer to it again. US Airways, you're pretty much off the hook. You have to negotiate, but you don't have to say yes to just anything." The primary focus of the parties’ summary judgment filings is whether the Transition Agreement is “binding” on USAPA. According to USAPA, it is “not ‘contractually’ bound by any of ALPA’s agreements,” including the Transition Agreement. (Doc. 160 at 10). But the West Pilots, as well as US Airways, cite a variety of authority supporting the position that the “decertification of ALPA and the certification of USAPA did not change the binding nature of the Transition Agreement.” (Doc. 164 at 7). The West Pilots and US Airways are correct. When USAPA became the pilots’ new collective bargaining representative, it succeeded “to the status of the former representative without alteration in the contract terms.” Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters v. Texas Int’l Airlines, Inc., 717 F.2d 157, 163 (5th Cir. 1983). As there does not appear to be any dispute that the Transition Agreement was part of the contract between the pilots and US Airways, the Transition Agreement applies to USAPA. Even the case which USAPA relies upon states there is a “general principle that collective bargaining agreements survive a change in representative.” Ass’n of Flight Attendants, AFL-CIO v. USAir, Inc., 24 F.3d 1432, 1439 (D.C. Cir. 1994). Thus, just as ALPA would have been bound by the Transition Agreement had it remained the pilots’ representative, USAPA is bound by the Transition Agreement.2 |
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 1275712)
I think you guys are forgetting the claim that a joint contract cannot be affected with the Nicolau award in it. The years of lost wages fighting against the Nic may be to USAPAs favor. Something to consider.
I think this would be a good time for both sides to step back, look at what has been lost and reconsider their positions. I have little hope of that happening. |
Originally Posted by cactiboss
(Post 1275715)
I agree but when she says "law" she means the 9th ruling, a ruling she doesn't agree with and it is that ruling that kept her from deciding the case. Also another thing that I think is huge, for the first time usapa was told they inherited the nicolau award.:
|
Originally Posted by cactiboss
(Post 1275717)
There is much case law that says the majority can't change the seniority of a minority. Only Rakestraw allowed a seniority to be changed, you should read it.
|
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 1275712)
I think you guys are forgetting the claim that a joint contract cannot be affected with the Nicolau award in it. The years of lost wages fighting against the Nic may be to USAPAs favor. Something to consider.
I think this would be a good time for both sides to step back, look at what has been lost and reconsider their positions. I have little hope of that happening. I don't think the second sentence is true. You guys are losing money and the upgrades are not really compensating for the dollars lost. Starting in December we will have upgrades again for attrition and maybe I can go back to holding a line on the 757 again. As far as stepping back and looking at this? Sure, we will see what USAPA comes up with. It will be without West input because we have none. All we can do is watch and see how negotiations go. I think USAPA will come up with something that harms the West and we will be back in court again. But remember, we are not holding up the process. This is between USAPA and the company. The West is a minority here. We have nothing that prevents the negotiatig process from going forward. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:53 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands