NYT: Alaska Flying Above Industry Troubles
#1
NYT: Alaska Flying Above Industry Troubles
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/03/bu...echnology&_r=0
If FOs are not allowed to land in Kodiak, how will they ever get the experience? And how did the Captains first learn to land there?
I know I should ask my, uh, in-house expert, but he's on vacation.
If FOs are not allowed to land in Kodiak, how will they ever get the experience? And how did the Captains first learn to land there?
I know I should ask my, uh, in-house expert, but he's on vacation.
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,886
Largely because of that technology, flying in Alaska is now remarkably reliable — even in the dead of winter, when it is snowing, when there are just two hours of daylight, when runways are made slippery by ice or sleet, when winds blow at more than 50 miles an hour and pilots can barely see out the windshield. When, in other words, no one in his right mind would want to land a Boeing 737 with 140 passengers on a 6,000-foot runway.
#5
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/03/bu...echnology&_r=0
If FOs are not allowed to land in Kodiak, how will they ever get the experience? And how did the Captains first learn to land there?
I know I should ask my, uh, in-house expert, but he's on vacation.
If FOs are not allowed to land in Kodiak, how will they ever get the experience? And how did the Captains first learn to land there?
I know I should ask my, uh, in-house expert, but he's on vacation.
Many Airlines have Specific "Captain's only landing" airports, or they have criteria when the Captain "must" make the landing. (High crosswinds, runway contamination, Low visibility etc). It is not that FO's are not qualified to do it, they are but the Captain, in most cases, has more experience and is the one who signs the Flight release and therefore is ultimately responsible for the saftey of flight.
The FO's gain experience acting as the PM (Pilot Monitoring) during these approaches and landings. They see how it is suppose to be done (or not in a few cases).
Again, I cannot speak with any authority for Alaska Air procedures, but To answer your question, I would guess that any new Captain at Alaska Air has a Check Airman ride with him or her when doing their first landing at these High Risk Airports or they practice the approach/landing in a Simulator.
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,886
Beyond the borders of the US, it's a different story. Time to command may be as little as 3 to 4 years with 3 to 4 thousand hours in the logbook. Most join foreign carriers as cadets with about 250 hours TT. Most of the flying with most non US carriers is with full automatics with very little manual flying.
On the other hand, I encourage all my FOs to hand fly without FDs A/Ts, and delay AP engagement until underway above 10,000' with disconnect below 15,000'. The automatics are always available, but most decline to use them.
I don't place weather, wind or visability limits on my FOs. I'll take control if the situation starts to go pear shape. After all, how else will FOS gain the experience?
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,886
Bad stuff happens when Captain Bligh builds the one way wall of communication, regardless of totoal crew experience.
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: B737, CA
Posts: 176
media not accurate = surprise?
As stated earlier - ADQ has Capt only landing / Takeoff on rwy 18, 36 & 29. ADK also has this Capt landing limitation on rwy 05. I don't like these rules, but I don't get to make the rules.
Also, it takes 2 maybe 3 days of OE to get Arctic qual - certainly not years... The media sure did their homework on this peice.
Automation only goes so far when working the Arctic or any short, dark, slippery place. I've seen some new hires select auto breaks 1, land and never disarm the breaks - which means that their feet were on the floor to 60 knots. That will not win you bonus points on a 6,000 foot slippery runway.
Also, it takes 2 maybe 3 days of OE to get Arctic qual - certainly not years... The media sure did their homework on this peice.
Automation only goes so far when working the Arctic or any short, dark, slippery place. I've seen some new hires select auto breaks 1, land and never disarm the breaks - which means that their feet were on the floor to 60 knots. That will not win you bonus points on a 6,000 foot slippery runway.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post