![]() |
Bucking Bar
You post great stuff but I gotta call shenanigans on a DL captain being the high time F-14 pilot. Dale Snodgrass with 4,800 hours in the Turkey is widely recognized as the high time guy and retired after 26 years in the USN. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1418251)
Huh?
Flying the Concorde for who? Braniff had a few Concorde pilots running around who ended up with other airlines in the US. The highest time F14 driver in the World is a Captain at Delta. He worked production flight test for Grumman and used to take off and intercept the Concorde coming across the Atlantic to test the F14's. |
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
(Post 1418330)
Bucking Bar
You post great stuff but I gotta call shenanigans on a DL captain being the high time F-14 pilot. Dale Snodgrass with 4,800 hours in the Turkey is widely recognized as the high time guy and retired after 26 years in the USN. This gentleman (who's name I am not going to post) flew USN, then went to Grumman where he did production test work on the aircraft coming off the line. I do not recall what he said his TT in T was, but in production test work, flying profiles in every single new airplane as it is built a guy can get a lot of time if the program is moving along. Maybe he was the highest time in some variant and I missed the distinction, maybe the D since that would fit the timeline. |
Originally Posted by captjns
(Post 1418110)
Original 767's with F/E panels designed for old United Airlines. They made it to Ansett Airlines of Australia. Talk about a bare overhead panel.
Ansett AN22 Flight Deck 14 June 1987 - YouTube scroll through the movie to catch the overhead panel and F/E's panel |
In the late 60's it was not unusual to see a 27-28 year old DC-9 Capt at TWA, 7 years later they would be lucky to hold 707 F/O.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1418340)
A F14 could not possibly intercept a Concorde flying at mach 2. It could get in a firing solution but it would never be able to join up. In addition the distance from the mainland to where the Concorde was running at supersonic speeds would preclude any type of intercept without extensive air refueling assets for the F14. Supersonic intercepts are very difficult to run to a firing solution and impossible to actually catch and join up with a aircraft at mach 2 plus. Not enough fuel, distance, airspace and time.
I dunno; the fastest I've ever been is in Row 6 of an L1011 with a Captain who was a commuter on the last leg of a four day which had been delayed due to a mechanical. I am certainly not expert enough to question what the man said. I've read even the Super Hornet, while a better all around platform, lacks the fleet defense capabilities (speed, carrying ability without a significant drag penalty, and endurance) of the D model. But again, I'm no expert. Who would ever believe we used to shoot down satellites with F15's, but we did. |
Ship 106 was a screaming piece of crap. [DL]
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1418340)
A F14 could not possibly intercept a Concorde flying at mach 2. It could get in a firing solution but it would never be able to join up. In addition the distance from the mainland to where the Concorde was running at supersonic speeds would preclude any type of intercept without extensive air refueling assets for the F14. Supersonic intercepts are very difficult to run to a firing solution and impossible to actually catch and join up with a aircraft at mach 2 plus. Not enough fuel, distance, airspace and time.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1418340)
A F14 could not possibly intercept a Concorde flying at mach 2. It could get in a firing solution but it would never be able to join up.
In addition the distance from the mainland to where the Concorde was running at supersonic speeds would preclude any type of intercept without extensive air refueling assets for the F14. Supersonic intercepts are very difficult to run to a firing solution and impossible to actually catch and join up with a aircraft at mach 2 plus. Not enough fuel, distance, airspace and time. Of course intercept doesn't nescessarily mean join up in formation - that is just one type of intercept. Yes - BB seemed to be talking about testing F-14s coming off the production line - but *intercepting* anything didn't require launching from the mainland for the mighty Turkey. Not sure what you meant about supersonic intercepts being very difficult to run to a firing solution. In what way? |
OK, found a link to some trials flown officially ...
Originally Posted by Wiki
In British Airways trials in April 1985, Concorde was offered as a target to NATO fighters including F-15 Eagles, F-16 Fighting Falcons, F-14 Tomcats, Mirages, and F-104 Starfighters - but only Lightning XR749, flown by Mike Hale and described by him as "a very hot ship, even for a Lightning", managed to overtake Concorde on a stern conversion intercept.
Next time I fly with the gentleman I am going to beg him to write A&S Smithsonian or a similar repository. Seem like an interesting story which might amuse those who say "nah no way." |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:14 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands