Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Jetblue "3A" decision. >

Jetblue "3A" decision.

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Jetblue "3A" decision.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2013 | 05:22 AM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,525
Likes: 64
Default

Originally Posted by P-3Bubba
Ahh, the "ANTI" types. Your conspiracy theories revealed. BlueDriver, Benzobait is a lost cause. He's turned - zombie style. BD I too believe there is no conspiracy, and I too look toward the "truth mills" not rumor for appropriate information.

-Bubs
Typical.

If you signed up for 3A you believed management violated 3A. If you didnt sign 3A you believed management. When you are a little less wet behind the ears come back and post.

We all enjoy how a noob knows everything.
Reply
Old 06-01-2013 | 06:20 AM
  #22  
P-3Bubba's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 78
From: P-3C
Default

I may be a noob but not a boob.
Reply
Old 06-01-2013 | 08:53 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
From: 320 F.O.
Default

Originally Posted by benzoate
Not exactly. The claim never applied to 190 FO's as the suit was based of their pay. Of roughly 1400 eligible pilots almost 1000 signed on. Those that did not were mostly pro-management types.
As far as sticking together there isn't much 3A pilots can do. The company lost, made it clear to the arbitrator they would not make the remaining pilots whole. This pilot group has been divided long before 3A. I suppose we will all see what the airlines response is in the coming weeks.
Actually it was only the 2007 claim which wasn't the almost 1000 pilots it was on the 2009 claim the original claim was around 350 or so. At least that is my understanding of the decision, I might be wrong.
Reply
Old 06-02-2013 | 04:21 AM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Default Acronyms

As an outsider reading this thread---PEA, got it!
What's PST? PVC? PAR?

Thanks!
Reply
Old 06-02-2013 | 05:18 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by V1rotateV2
As an outsider reading this thread---PEA, got it!
What's PST? PVC? PAR?

Thanks!
Think of it as a multi part student council.
Reply
Old 06-02-2013 | 05:46 AM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,525
Likes: 64
Default

Originally Posted by V1rotateV2
As an outsider reading this thread---PEA, got it!
What's PST? PVC? PAR?

Thanks!
Absent a union we have committees which mimic, on paper, union committees only they have suggestion power with no negotiation ability. Also, the airline is able to appoint 1/3 of each committee except for the PVC which is akin to an MEC.
PST and PAR are acronyms for negotiating committees which report back to management or the airlines management.
Reply
Old 06-02-2013 | 05:48 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by txbusdriver
Think of it as a multi part student council.
A student council whom a few hundred grown men and women seem to believe that they are 100 times better than a CBA.
Reply
Old 06-02-2013 | 12:21 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by amcflyboy
A student council whom a few hundred grown men and women seem to believe that they are 100 times better than a CBA.
Well Bluebelle, the results of a recent survey show the vast majority want a CBA. Some have heartache on ALPA but expect another vote soon.

My student council comment is in regards to the power of the committees, not the tireless effort of the individuals serving.
Reply
Old 06-17-2013 | 10:20 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Climbto450
I am hearing somewhere around 50 million as a result of only the 2007 claims, it would have been in the neighborhood of 300 million if the 2009 claims where allowed. I wonder if this will have an affect on the compensation review?
I think you have your numbers way off.

$30-$50 million would be the answer if they had settled back in 2009 when 3A was first submitted (200-250 pilots). However, with nearly 1000 pilots (2/3rds of them Captains) the number is much much bigger. Even if you apply the smallest possible interpertiation you get closer to $80-100 million in back pay. If you take a more agressive interpretation of 3A you get upwards of $120-180 million. That doesn't even include any potential penalty.

We will see in the next few weeks, but it will be a big number any way you look at it. Plus, Neeleman lost his job for just a $40 million mistake. Barger, RM and Hnat all should lose their jobs on this one as this was INTENTIONAL on thier part.

Just my opinion......

FNG
Reply
Old 06-17-2013 | 10:26 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by benzoate
The airline and the legal firm have to agree on a forensic accountant to come in and make that determination. There is quite a bit of work to do. It's not just retro pay but also medial leaves, disability payments 401k contributions. Lost I stuff above our pay grades.
All of this can be done in just a few weeks if sufficient numbers of people are used to do it. Thus it will cost $$$$$ for JetBlue to do it in a timely fashion. Remember, all of the data is in the JetBlue comptuers. It only takes changing the pay scales and reprocessing the pay.

Yes, JetBlue will delay, delay, delay (JetBlue Standard) and plead that they need time. However, if they just pay the money to hire the necessary people it can be done within weeks for all pilots in 3A.

Just my opinion......

FNG
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
benzoate
Major
271
05-10-2013 10:34 AM
Pinchanickled
Regional
33
12-17-2010 06:58 PM
RockBottom
Major
4
04-09-2006 04:23 PM
fireman0174
JetBlue
0
04-05-2006 06:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices