Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Flap speed Question for any 737 NG operators >

Flap speed Question for any 737 NG operators

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Flap speed Question for any 737 NG operators

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2013 | 10:00 AM
  #11  
mulcher's Avatar
gets time off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 91
Default

We don't use speed breaks and flaps at SWA.
Reply
Old 11-02-2013 | 10:12 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: duck & cover
Default

Company imposed 240 for F1, F5.
Reply
Old 11-02-2013 | 10:32 AM
  #13  
cal73's Avatar
Thread Starter
Redeye avoider
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 931
Likes: 13
From: 737 Captain
Default

Interesting
Guys thanks for the replies.
Reply
Old 11-02-2013 | 10:53 AM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 976
Likes: 50
Default

Originally Posted by Opakapaka
Ok then, which operators can use speed brakes with flaps extended?
I always thought they were more of a turbulence inducer than a speedbrake., but we could use both when I flew it.
Reply
Old 11-02-2013 | 12:35 PM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 390
Likes: 4
Default

At Alaska, we can only select the next flap setting at current maneuver speed +10kts. That means, in a light -700, you could be selecting flaps 1 under 210kts. Additionally, we select, 1, 5, sometimes 10, 15, 25, 30 and sometimes 40. That's 7 flap selections. It's pretty rediculous. I'm in favor of the SWA "5,15,30." Simple.

We are constantly reminded of the "problem" that foqa is picking up pilots selecting flaps "early."
Reply
Old 11-02-2013 | 12:48 PM
  #16  
cal73's Avatar
Thread Starter
Redeye avoider
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 931
Likes: 13
From: 737 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by cesnacaptn
At Alaska, we can only select the next flap setting at current maneuver speed +10kts. That means, in a light -700, you could be selecting flaps 1 under 210kts. Additionally, we select, 1, 5, sometimes 10, 15, 25, 30 and sometimes 40. That's 7 flap selections. It's pretty rediculous. I'm in favor of the SWA "5,15,30." Simple. We are constantly reminded of the "problem" that foqa is picking up pilots selecting flaps "early."
Wow it must take you a long time to slow down.

We use all the flap settings except for 2. 10, and 25 are just used as extra drag.
Reply
Old 11-02-2013 | 06:18 PM
  #17  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

As Southwest starts getting more -800's I don't see how they'll avoid using flaps and speed brakes.

Delta also has some sort of package they've been installing on our engines which makes them idle at slightly higher N2. That doesn't help.
Reply
Old 11-02-2013 | 07:01 PM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 732
Likes: 25
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
As Southwest starts getting more -800's I don't see how they'll avoid using flaps and speed brakes.
Yep, my first visual approach in one of our new -800s was eye-opening. Not an airplane to even get close to pressing the field with, to be sure. It's compounded by that pesky Short Field Performance Package that ours have (no full LE slat extension until F25!) So it's easy to find yourself gear down, F15, 190 KIAS, on G/S, and the airplane starts accelerating! Though I've found that the extra slippery isn't too hard to compensate for as long as you remind yourself you're not in a -700.
Reply
Old 11-02-2013 | 07:14 PM
  #19  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Smokey23
Yep, my first visual approach in one of our new -800s was eye-opening. Not an airplane to even get close to pressing the field with, to be sure. It's compounded by that pesky Short Field Performance Package that ours have (no full LE slat extension until F25!) So it's easy to find yourself gear down, F15, 190 KIAS, on G/S, and the airplane starts accelerating! Though I've found that the extra slippery isn't too hard to compensate for as long as you remind yourself you're not in a -700.
Nothing against you, but to this day it cracks me up hearing 737 guys speak of the 737 as being slippery. Sure it is compared to an MD-88 or especially a CRJ, but having flown the 757/767 and Airbus... that thing is a lead sled in comparison! I could do just about whatever i wanted to as far as descents in that thing compared to it's more clean competitors.

As far as runway performance... The 800 had the most pucker factor of any plane I've flown thus far. Whole lot of speed down final and really crappy brakes!
Reply
Old 11-02-2013 | 08:07 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 732
Likes: 25
Default

..........

Last edited by Smokey23; 11-02-2013 at 08:14 PM. Reason: duplicate
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EnglishmaninNY
Technical
12
01-16-2011 12:20 PM
AZFlyer
Hangar Talk
18
08-23-2009 07:27 PM
Dan64456
Technical
19
06-25-2009 10:25 AM
keiundraj
Regional
103
04-04-2008 04:41 AM
Seeburg220
Major
60
04-02-2008 09:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices