Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Single Operating Captain >

Single Operating Captain

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Single Operating Captain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2015 | 09:39 PM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Default

Second pilot on the ground in an air conditioned room monitoring 11 flights... Isn't that called a dispatcher?
Reply
Old 03-13-2015 | 09:47 PM
  #52  
Short Bus Drive's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Capt.
Default

Nice article!
I always told the guys/ girls running a train was more mental work than flying...
( former National Railroad Passenger Corporation [aka Amtrak] locomotive engineer on the NE corridor)
Reply
Old 03-13-2015 | 09:59 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Short Bus Drive
Nice article!
I always told the guys/ girls running a train was more mental work than flying...
( former National Railroad Passenger Corporation [aka Amtrak] locomotive engineer on the NE corridor)
Thanks Short, I appreciate that. I was a freight conductor; however my Pop was an engineer, he ran west out of Cheyenne Wy on the UP. 41 years he put in with that outfit and retired at 60! I agree with you 100% I simply wasn't tough enough to follow in his footsteps
Reply
Old 03-14-2015 | 05:51 AM
  #54  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: A320/321 CA
Default

Originally Posted by DENpilot
Never mind any terroristic scenario. The only thing that usually keeps my forehead from making contact with the glareshield during a 4 hour flight is the guy sitting next to me.

With single pilot operations, you're still asking a single pilot to:

-Stay alert and focused with no human contact for hours on end.
-Clear traffic/obstacles both left and right after push, during taxi out and taxi-in.
-Look for traffic in the air.
-Assume he's on the correct routing, taxi route, making the right real time calls.
-Tune radios, run checklists, talk to ATC, talk to FAs, talk to pax


AND MOST IMPORTANT:

This turns back years of progress on CRM by essentially making the CA "god" again, enabling him to make unilateral, real-time decisions with little to no input from others.

Will. Not. Happen.
What about just taking a break or the need to drop a deuce? You're going to leave your duty station unattended ?
Reply
Old 03-14-2015 | 05:54 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Nemo
What about just taking a break or the need to drop a deuce? You're going to leave your duty station unattended ?
Good point. I think I need to patent a new type of pilot seat. There is money to be made.
Reply
Old 03-14-2015 | 06:53 AM
  #56  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Icedeemon
Second pilot on the ground in an air conditioned room monitoring 11 flights... Isn't that called a dispatcher?
Exactly. But the plan is to have an actual pilot in that seat because he/she knows better what is going on in the air.
Reply
Old 03-14-2015 | 08:07 AM
  #57  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: Da Bus
Default

Originally Posted by sulkair
Railroading is every bit as challenging as aviation. It's all about energy management and when you're coming down a mountain pass with the Earth's gravity pushing 18,000 tons of coal on your butt, you'd better have you head on strait and be working as a crew. You've got to use just the right amount of brakes. Air/car braking and locomotive/dynamic. Too little, you overspeed the first curve and you're a dead crew - fiery train wreck - taking out a small town in the process. Too much braking and you'll mismanage your air and end up with zero brakes or if you don't do that you'll melt through all your brakes and become a runaway. Next curve, same result. Pulling a hill is just as challenging too. You also have to learn an enormous set of federal regulations just like we do in aviation. It's more similar than you'd imagine.

Switching out cars in the yard is an exercise in complex logic every day. Like a massive jigsaw puzzle, how do you take apart a train, and put another one together with X number of tracks, in the least amount of moves. How do you do this day in and day out without derailing, or crunching equipment together, or the biggest challenge, not crunching yourself! It is an incredibly physical and mental environment and you're dealing with long hours, many through the night, in every type of weather. I was challenged every day, and recognized strait away that no dummy can do that job.

I wrote an article a few years ago titled : Airline Pilot vs Railroader, you should check it out.

Maybe you'll shoot me a 'cool story bro' once again, but this time really mean it

...
Cool story bro!!

I'm sure being an engineer is a challenging job. A train however operates in a two dimensional world. I have yet to read about a disoriented engineer driving a train into the side of a mountain. If you have a serious enough problem you can just stop. The UPS 747 in Dubai didn't have any such option.

I respect the difficulty of an train engineer, but it isn't in the same league as flying an airplane.
Reply
Old 03-14-2015 | 08:54 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ray Red
Good point. I think I need to patent a new type of pilot seat. There is money to be made.
Make sure you put the TP roller right next to the autopilot disconnect button. Hilarity is sure to happen!
Reply
Old 03-14-2015 | 08:55 AM
  #59  
Cohiba's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Default 2 research venues

There are 2 research initiatives currently funded. NASA- Ames is pursuing the 1 pilot program as described. Duke University/MIT Human Performance Lab is pursuing a pilotless initiative. Don't shoot the messenger on this. UPS has already filed a petition to operate a Pilotless 767 and are actively working with Duke's HPL. Sounds crazy but they anticipate a working model in less than 18 months (contract specification). It's gonning to happen quicker rather than later and most probably with Cargo in the 5-10 year time frame. Flying a reduced pilot or pilotless plane with passengers has serious political and cultural obstacles, but there is a ton of money being spent. And to make things worse is every time we have an incident where pilot error or lack of flight path monitoring is involved, it only strengthens the case.
Reply
Old 03-14-2015 | 09:02 AM
  #60  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,870
Likes: 85
Default

Originally Posted by Cohiba
It's going to happen quicker rather than later and most probably with Cargo in the 5-10 year time frame
Not going to happen. You might see a concept demonstration sure, but of a $100M widebody? And then fully operational for revenue?

Nah.

That's not me putting my head in the sand about the technology (which, despite nearly unlimited military budgets over the last 15 years STILL isn't 100% reliable or secure), its me being realistic about the regulatory and social changes required well beyond the technology to see such a thing.

You'll see single pilot G650s well before you see a single pilot (and certainly a remote piloted) transport full of revenue.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
SoCalGuy
United
178
05-19-2019 03:13 AM
WeaselBoy
Major
94
07-29-2009 09:24 PM
Flameout
Major
64
09-17-2008 02:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices