S.65 language
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
#12
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Expected to approve? By whom? The FAA has never approved an exemption. I don't see them starting now; do you have some secret insight into this?
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Guys, this is the 3rd S.65 in three years. What makes you think this one will pass? Heck, it might not even make it out of committee. Last year it did, with almost all Dems against. Now the Dems are in control!!! Anyway, for every day it stays 60, more people punch out of the big iron!!! 

#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
IF the NPRM was a slam dunk, it would've already been announced. That Continental pilot who died inflight yesterday won't help your cause.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/01/20/pil....ap/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/01/20/pil....ap/index.html
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
I agree. If age 65 passes, then the company can put s/o's back in the left seat but will only do so to fill vacancies. As new bids post, those in the back could bid to the front again to fill vacancies. Passover would be paid only to those who could have held the front on the bid but the company chose not to train them because of time until they reach 65 (ie., a 64 year old could have held it but they trained a junior 60 year old to get the most bang for their buck instead). The company will only do what they have to by law or labor agreement and not a penny more. The question is, how many vacancies will there be when the rule changes and those 58 and 59 year olds decide to stay. I think the only way that those in the back that are over 60 will see the front again or get paid for it is through growth. Thoughts?
#17
"Except with all the exemption requests the FAA has been receiving and expected to approve you can expect very little "Move em' out!!"
C'mon Mister Grumpy Pants..aren't you tired of this yet? You have been acting like the cat that ate the canary for years when it comes to Age 60 changing. You think you have all the info that it is going to change and when it doesn't you start calling those against it names like bigots and scabs. Truth is you have very little idea of what is going to happen, or if it does, when. You just keep acting like you know more than us though and keep heading towards your inevitable retirement. In the meantime, enjoy the seniority that was given to you by those that retired because of Age 60. My guess is you will join them before any rule change takes effect...
C'mon Mister Grumpy Pants..aren't you tired of this yet? You have been acting like the cat that ate the canary for years when it comes to Age 60 changing. You think you have all the info that it is going to change and when it doesn't you start calling those against it names like bigots and scabs. Truth is you have very little idea of what is going to happen, or if it does, when. You just keep acting like you know more than us though and keep heading towards your inevitable retirement. In the meantime, enjoy the seniority that was given to you by those that retired because of Age 60. My guess is you will join them before any rule change takes effect...
#19
#20
IF the NPRM was a slam dunk, it would've already been announced. That Continental pilot who died inflight yesterday won't help your cause.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/01/20/pil....ap/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/01/20/pil....ap/index.html
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




