Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
PAX O2 masks for smoke or fumes??? >

PAX O2 masks for smoke or fumes???

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

PAX O2 masks for smoke or fumes???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2016, 08:19 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default

Think that some of the Airbus aircraft have a O2 mask deployment switch on the FAP.
iceman49 is offline  
Old 02-12-2016, 08:22 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 513
Default

Aerotoxic sickness

Been a known problem for years over in Europe
VegassBus is offline  
Old 02-12-2016, 08:49 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,815
Default

Don't deploy them in smoke/fire scenarios.
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 02-14-2016, 01:06 PM
  #14  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 9
Default

Once they drop, kind of forced to use them because the O2 generators get so hot and will smell like they are burning. To use them in a smoke environment it would be hard to convince the passengers to use them correctly, as in...for smoke. The flight attendants say every brief that O2 is being delivered even if the bag is not inflated. This is for loss of pressurization as the deflated bag is giving mix of O2 and ambient air. If they could calm their breathing and inhale only each time the bag inflates, then there is no ambient air, and thus great for smoke. If at any time smoke or fumes becomes the greatest threat, smoke removal should be performed, and that would be quicker than trying to reteach the passengers how to use the mask in a different way than they were briefed.
JetPoweredNomad is offline  
Old 02-14-2016, 02:13 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

NO! NO! A thousand times NO! Passenger oxygen masks are not sealed. They mix the provided oxygen with cabin air. So if you deploy oxygen masks only for smoke, YOU are encouraging them to breath more smoke into their lungs adding to the possibility they will die from smoke inhalation.

Obviously, when the masks come down, most of the passengers will start anxiety breathing and take MORE air into their lungs than when they are relaxed. So giving them the masks exacerbates the problem of smoke inhalation.

Don't believe me? Next time you fly, go get the demo kit, put the mask on and see if you can still breath. If you're getting air with the demo mask on, your passengers will get smoke if you deploy the masks for that reason.

Passenger oxygen is for depressurization or medical requirements ONLY. Period.

It still amazes me how many professional pilots haven't figured this out.
Packrat is offline  
Old 02-14-2016, 03:32 PM
  #16  
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
The Juice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat View Post
NO! NO! A thousand times NO! Passenger oxygen masks are not sealed. They mix the provided oxygen with cabin air. So if you deploy oxygen masks only for smoke, YOU are encouraging them to breath more smoke into their lungs adding to the possibility they will die from smoke inhalation.

Obviously, when the masks come down, most of the passengers will start anxiety breathing and take MORE air into their lungs than when they are relaxed. So giving them the masks exacerbates the problem of smoke inhalation.

Don't believe me? Next time you fly, go get the demo kit, put the mask on and see if you can still breath. If you're getting air with the demo mask on, your passengers will get smoke if you deploy the masks for that reason.

Passenger oxygen is for depressurization or medical requirements ONLY. Period.

It still amazes me how many professional pilots haven't figured this out.
Exactly. Not seconding guessing the CA...however, perhaps a better solution would be a quick call to the Lead FA, telling them "masks wont be deployed, hand out as many wet paper towels you can or bottles of water to wet clothes to place over face to breath."

If nothing else, important to ask "what would I have done" because you never know
The Juice is offline  
Old 02-14-2016, 07:39 PM
  #17  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 9
Default

You guys are assuming they dropped them for smoke. The Removal of Smoke QRH states to set the landing elevation to 10,000 or MEA/MORA, whichever is higher. Their case was probably higher. My heart goes out to the gentlemen that died in an O2 rich environment in the NASA tragedy, but I have a feeling that the flow rate of a O2 generator would not significantly change the O2 environment in a passenger cabin, especially if it isn't even strong enough to fill the bag with normal respiration. If one had one hand, they could flex the muscles that would apply pressure on the mask to help form a seal, but then they'd still get ambient air if they didn't wait for the bag to fill. Nobody is advocating to drop the masks for smoke, but if they dropped when I was in the passenger cabin and the thing was full of smoke, that's how I'd use it.
JetPoweredNomad is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AKpilot
Major
7
07-28-2015 07:12 AM
CFI Guy
Part 135
37
04-04-2014 07:23 PM
palgia841
Major
9
12-07-2007 07:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices